You Can't Create a Weirder Candidate to Run Against Than James Talarico
This Federal Judge Just Blocked Trump's 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'
Obama Judge Busted for Having Loud Sex With Police Commander in Her Chambers
Black Judge Suspended for Allegedly Making Racist Comments About White Employee
Seattle Just Acquitted Another Violent Criminal Due to Mental Health Issues
Two of Media's Biggest Propagandists Are Worried CBS and CNN Might Actually Commit...
James Talarico Once Gave an Interesting Invocation Before a Texas Legislative Session
The Media Have Cracked the Case on Who's Paying to Clean Up D.C.
DHS Head Markwayne Mullin Vows Law and Order Will Prevail Against NJ Anti-ICE...
Democrats Are Soft on Crime, but Hard on Law-Abiding Citizens
The White House Just Unveiled Aliens.gov and It’s Not About Extraterrestrials
Zohran Mamdani Doubles Down on His Decision to Skip Israel Day Parade in...
Spencer Pratt Reacts to Gavin Newsom's Late Endorsement of Karen Bass for LA...
'Pizza to Pews' Event Comes to D.C. As Gen-Z Flocks to Catholicism
Trump Currently in Situation Room Ready to Make Major Iran Decision
Tipsheet

Many Welfare Recipients Eligible for More in Benefits Than Several Full-Time Workers

Many Welfare Recipients Eligible for More in Benefits Than Several Full-Time Workers

A new study conducted by the CATO Institute finds that New York welfare recipients are eligible for more in benefits than teachers earn. The study says that a New York mother of two is eligible for $38,004 in welfare benefits, which is more than the annual salary of a New York entry-level school teacher.

Advertisement

But it’s not only New York. CATO also found that in many states welfare pays better than work. Hawaii had the highest wage-equivalent benefits for a mother and two children at $60,590. Seriously?!

That’s not all! The study also found that “33 states and the District of Columbia offer welfare benefits that pay recipients more than an $8-an-hour job would. Twelve states and the District of Columbia offer welfare packages that pay better than a $15-an-hour job does.”

Wow. Talk about a system that needs to be fixed! Now, I am not trying to say that people on welfare are lazy, but what incentive is there for unemployed Americans to try and get back in the work force? If you pay them more not to work than what they could actually earn at a full-time job, why would anyone choose to go and work?

Since the 1960s and the “war on poverty” programs started, the U.S. taxpayers have spent over $15 trillion on these anti-poverty programs. The federal government has 126 low-income programs of which 72 offer citizens cash or in-kind benefits.

If this is not a sign that the welfare system needs to be overhauled, I don’t know what is.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement