I'm Shocked USA Today Allowed This Op-ed to Be Published About the Minneapolis...
Conservatives for Property Rights Urge White House Support for Patent Reform
Where's the Left's Outrage Over This Florida Shooting?
From Madison to Minneapolis: One Leftist's Mission to Stop ICE
Two Wisconsin Hospitals Halted 'Gender-Affirming Care' for Minors, but the Fight Isn't Ove...
Dilbert Creator Scott Adams Has Died at 68
Here's the Insane Reason a U.K. Asylum Seeker Was Spared Jail Despite Sex...
Trump’s Leverage Doctrine
Stop Pretending That Colleges Are Nonprofit Institutions
Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on Men in Women’s Sports...and Hoo Boy
Federal Reserve Chairman ‘Ignored’ DOJ, Pirro Says, Necessitating Criminal Probe
Iran Death Toll Tops 12,000 As Security Forces Begin to Slaughter Non-Protesting Civilians
If Bill Clinton Thought He Could Just Not Show Up for His House...
The December Inflation Report Is Here, and It's Good News
The GOP Is Restoring the American Dream of Homeownership
Tipsheet

Proposal: Trump Should Hire Turnaround Specialist Mitt Romney to Fix the VA

Americans are being treated to a log of media tongue-wagging over this weekend's upcoming summit between President-elect Donald Trump and Gov. Mitt Romney -- replete with the requisite flashbacks to several brutal shots fired between the two men. Romney is reportedly being considered for Secretary of State, which is a bit odd. He's certainly a smart and capable person who was proven correct about several major critiques of Obama foreign policy, but international relations isn't known to be his forte. Whether he's truly in the running for that post, or whether this is just a "clear the air" (or "kiss the ring") meeting, remains to be seen. On Charles Payne's Fox Business program last night, Fiscal Times columnist Liz Peek floated an interesting thought:

Advertisement

I reacted positively to this idea on the panel, and the more I think about it, the more I like it. It's simply a fact that Romney never wore the uniform, which may be perceived by some to be a strike against him for this position. But if you're a veteran in need of healthcare, which is more important to you?  Having a fellow vet running the cabinet agency, or having that scandal-plagued cabinet agency actually fixed? Ever since the VA scandal exploded onto front pages and outraged American voters (even as some leading Democrats sought to downplay it), politicians have burned through a lot of words talking about the issue. They've also burned through a lot more taxpayer money, even though funding was never the root problem; maddeningly, entrenched flaws and rampant unaccountability still persist.  It's a national disgrace.

To his credit, Donald Trump made improved treatment of our veterans a centerpiece theme of his campaign since day one. The VA is a big, bloated, dysfunctional entity that is failing far too many people in very damaging ways. Mitt Romney is a widely-renowned turnaround artist whose calling card is hyper-competence.  He's a patriot and a gifted, savvy technocrat who fixes things. This has been true of the businesses he rescued, as well as his extraordinary work saving the 2002 Winter Olympics. Because of its enduring failings, the VA doesn't simply need to be run or presided over by someone. It needs root-and-branch reform and repair through excellent, focused management. Mitt Romney would be an exceptional choice to lead that effort. I hope the president-elect considers this as an option, and the two men discuss it on Sunday. Here's my segment with Bill Hemmer from this morning in which I analyzed the much-anticipated Trump/Romney huddle and briefly laid out the case for VA Secretary Mitt Romney:

Advertisement

Related:

DONALD TRUMP

I'll leave you with this:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos