The Weekend’s Gun Tragedies Show Why You Must Buy (Even More) Guns
The Australian Police Reportedly 'Froze' During Bondi Terror Attack
The LAPD Presser on the Deaths of Rob Reiner and Wife Michele Singer...
Why Obama's People Want You to Call His 'Library' a 'Center' Instead
Tone Deaf: Did Chuck Schumer Really Say This on Sunday?
Liberal Lowlife: Mark Kelly
Shocker: 'Trans-Inclusive' Locker Room Policies Enabled Predators
Three Illegal Immigrants Arrested for Rash of Home Break-Ins in Wisconsin
Amanda Seyfried Thinks Socialism - a Grotesque Ideology - Is a Gorgeous Idea
The Anti-Zionist Movement Hits Home
The Stagnant Quo
There’s Nothing Magic About America’s Dirt
America's 21st Century National Security Strategy
Miracles and Heroes in Many Shapes This Chanukah
DOJ’s Opioid War Hurts Ordinary Americans in Pain
Tipsheet

Ramesh Ponnuru: Pawlenty Can Win

The conventional wisdom on Tim Pawlenty's presumptive presidential bid is that he's too bland, lacks charisma, and is a relative unknown -- all of which diminish his prospects. 
Advertisement
National Review's Ramesh Ponnuru profiles Pawlenty and envisions a number of paths to victory for the former Minnesota Governor:

Pawlenty is more electable than Palin, who is on the wrong end of a two-to-one split in public opinion; or Huckabee, who has never demonstrated any ability to win votes from non-evangelical voters; or Gingrich, who has enough baggage to open a Louis Vuitton store; or Haley Barbour, who, as a former lobbyist for tobacco companies and the governor of Mississippi, combines several Republican stereotypes to damaging effect. Electability would probably hand Pawlenty the nomination in a one-on-one race against any of these contenders.

He would probably beat Romney in a head-to-head race, too. Like Romney, Pawlenty was elected governor of a blue state in 2002. But there are at least five big differences between them that primary voters may find tell in the Minnesotan’s favor. First, Pawlenty was elected as a conservative whereas Romney ran as a moderate. Second, Pawlenty pursued a more confrontational strategy: He didn’t cut any grand bipartisan deal, as Romney did with Ted Kennedy on health care. Third, and as a result, Pawlenty’s record does not include anything as likely to offend conservative voters as Romney’s Massachusetts health-care law, which made the purchase of health insurance compulsory.

Fourth, Pawlenty won reelection in his blue state, even in 2006, which was a slaughterhouse of a year for Republicans. Romney, by contrast, left the governorship after one term: He was unable to position himself as a conservative for a presidential run while staying popular in his home state. Fifth, Pawlenty has an ability to connect to blue-collar voters that Romney has never demonstrated.
Advertisement

Team Pawlenty is hoping their guy turns into to be a consensus conservative pick -- perhaps not immediately, but equally inoffensive, to the majority of the base.  Ponnuru suggests that if TPaw can force any of his rivals into a two-man race, he'll prevail. 


UPDATE -  Mitt Romney is beginning to unveil his Romneycare vs. Obamacare talking points, arguing that he was right to pursue his Massachusetts policy, whereas Obamacare should be repealed.  Hello, federalism:


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement