Chris Cuomo Had a Former Leftist Call in to His Show. He Clearly...
This Town Filled Its Coffers With a Traffic Shakedown Scheme – Now They...
Planned Parenthood: Infants Not 'Conscious Beings' and Unlikely to Feel Pain
Democrats Boycotting OpenAI Over Support for Trump
USAID You Want a Revolution?
Roy Cooper Dodges Tough Questions About His Deadly Soft-on-Crime Policies
Axios Is Back With Another Ridiculous Anti-Trump Headline
In Historic Deregulatory Move, Trump Officially Revokes Obama-Era Endangerment Finding
Colorado Democrats Want to Trample First, Second Amendments With Latest Bill
White House Religious Liberty Commission Member Removed After Hijacking Antisemitism Heari...
Federal Judge Blocks Pete Hegseth From Reducing Sen. Mark Kelly's Pay Over 'Seditious...
AG Pam Bondi Vows to Prosecute Threats Against Lawmakers, Even Across Party Lines
Georgia Man Sentenced to Over 3 Years in Prison for TikTok Threats to...
Walz Administration Claims $217M in Fraud After Prosecutor Pointed to Billions
2 Pakistani Nationals Charged in $10M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Video: Senators Obama, Clinton, Schumer, Reid Denounce Filibuster "Reform"

Video: Senators Obama, Clinton, Schumer, Reid Denounce Filibuster "Reform"
Who's up for a brief history lesson?  When Democrats were in the minority during the Bush administration, they vociferously opposed -- and ultimately stopped
Advertisement
-- a Republican effort to do away with the extra-constitutional practice of filibustering judicial nominees (which remains the right thing to do, but that's an issue for another day).   Sen. Dianne Feinstein in May of 2005 warned in a floor speech that by changing Senate rules to end the super-majority threshold for confirming presidential appointments, Republicans would shove the Senate down a slippery slope:

"The nuclear option, if successful, will turn the Senate into a body that could have its rules broken at any time by a majority of senators unhappy with any position taken by the minority. It begins with judicial nomination, next will be executive appointments, and then legislation."

Here are Feinstein's full remarks:



Feinstein was voicing her primary concern that the legislative filibuster -- a practice that is universally accepted as Constitutional, and has been employed by members of both parties -- may eventually be eroded.  In other words, she contended that abolishing the judicial filibuster using the "nuclear option" would be the gateway drug to tampering with the legislative filibuster, which would be unthinkable.
Advertisement


Yet that's exactly what Democrats are proposing to do tomorrow.  Harry Reid & Co. lustily used the judicial filibuster in an unprecedented fashion to stymie numerous qualified Republican-appointed judges like Miguel Estrada when they were the minority party. But now that they're back in power, they've become exasperated with minority Republicans' filibuster "abuse," which has stalled and blocked legislation -- which has long been the specific and undisputed purpose of the filibuster.  The Democratic caucus is currently deliberating over how best to jettison or circumvent the practice, and Senate Republican aides say any such action is likely to be introduced tomorrow afternoon.

As Democrats contemplate uprooting decades of Senate tradition by "reforming" the legislative filibuster rule, Republicans have compiled a video reminding them of their own words:



Senate Democrats are currently considering triggering their own thermonuclear option on the legislative filibuster.  Before they take that plunge, they might want to consider heeding their own counsel from just a few short years ago.
Advertisement



UPDATE - What a striking dichotomy:  While Senate Democrats are plotting to weaken the rights of the minority party in the upper chamber, Speaker Boehner is preparing to enhance minority party rights in the lower chamber:

On Wednesday the new speaker of the House of Representatives plans to offer a package of rule changes that, he says, will give minority-party members more of a say and decentralize power. In short, Ohio Republican Mr. Boehner is promising he'll be a different figure from many speakers throughout history—from Republican Joseph Cannon a century ago to his immediate predecessor, Democrat Nancy Pelosi—who kept a tighter leash.

How this tension is resolved—between Mr. Boehner's promises and the need to get things done—will help determine the success of the new Republican majority. The GOP is in a hurry to show that it's different, not just from Democrats but from its old self.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos