BREAKING: RFK Jr. Has Landed a Nomination in the Trump Administration
So, That's Why Bob Casey Didn't Concede the PA Senate Race
Did You Notice What's Suddenly Missing From AOC's Twitter Bio?
Blinken: Before Trump Takes Office, 'Every Dollar We Have at Our Disposal Will...
Pocahontas Way Off Reservation on Hegseth Attack
UR Investigating After 'Wanted' Posters Featuring Jewish Faculty, Staff Plastered Around C...
The View Suddenly Looking to Hire a Pro-Trump Woman As Ratings Nosedive
As He Gets Ready to Chair the Senate Homeland Security Committee, Rand Paul...
Kyrsten Sinema Has Some Words for Pramila Jayapal on Stating the Obvious About...
FBI Thwarts '9/11-Style' Terror Attack Plot on US Soil
One Hollywood Celeb Said That Her Family Moved Out of the ‘Scary’ and...
Egregious: A Wisconsin School District Received Over $1 Million to Promote Woke Initiative...
Revealed: How Bob Casey and His Lawyers Are Trying to Steal an Election...
Hundreds of Explicit Books Have Been Expunged From Schools in This State
George Clooney Whines About Being Used As a 'Scapegoat' Following Harris' Loss
Tipsheet

Gorsuch Casts Deciding Vote on Immigration Case - It May Surprise You

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch's latest vote is confusing his conservative fans. In a case considering the deportation of an immigrant convicted of a felony, Gorsuch sided with the liberal justices in deciding to allow him to stay in the United States.

Advertisement

James Garcia Dimaya is a lawful resident who came to the U.S. from the Philippines at age 13. He was convicted of residential burglary in 2007 and 2009 and the Obama administration mandated that he be deported in 2010. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, noting that the term "aggravated felony" under the Immigration and Nationality Act was too vague.

The Supreme Court agreed with the 9th circuit. While conservatives may be frustrated by Gorsuch's vote, the court supposedly used the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia's reasoning in their opinion. In delivering the court's ruling, Justice Elena Kagan cited a 2015 ruling written by Scalia that struck down a clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act as unconstitutionally vague. That clause allowed past convictions to be viewed as violent felonies if they involved "conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another."

Advertisement

Still, today's ruling is considered a defeat for the Trump administration, according to media.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement