CBS Removes Trans Mandates From Its Reporting; NY Times Accuses War Crimes With...
Anti-ICE Protesters Try to Shame an Agent — It Backfires Spectacularly
For the Trans Activist Class, It’s All About Them
Ilhan Omar Claims ICE Isn’t Arresting Criminals. Here's Proof That She's Lying.
'The Constitution of a Deity' RFK Jr. on President Trump's Diet
Father-in-Law of Renee Good Refuses to Blame ICE, Urges Americans to Turn to...
Iranian State Media Airs a Direct Assassination Threat Against President Trump
US Halts Immigrant Visas From 75 Countries Over Welfare Abuse Concerns
Tricia McLaughlin Defends ICE's Visible Presence
California Man Pleads Guilty to Laundering Over $1.5M and Evading Taxes on $4M
Venezuelan Man Shot After Assaulting ICE Agent With Shovel
House Committee IT Staffer Charged With Stealing 240 Government Phones Worth $150K
Justice Department Challenges Minnesota’s Affirmative Action Hiring Requirements
Founder of LGBTQ+ Nonprofit Casa Ruby Sentenced in Federal Fraud Case
DC Rapper 'Taliban Glizzy' Sentenced to Over 18 Years for Multi-State Jewelry Heists
Tipsheet

DOJ Sides With North Carolina NAACP in Voter Registration Lawsuit

Last week, the North Carolina NAACP accused the state of discriminating against minority voters by canceling over 100 voter registrations. County officials voided these registrations because mailings were being returned as undeliverable. Yet, the NAACP claims their action was in violation of the National Voting Registration Act and has decided to pursue a lawsuit.

Advertisement

The group has found support from the Obama administration's Department of Justice. The agency agrees that the county election boards are clearly in violation of the NVRA.

“[T]he purge program at issue here rested on a mass mailing and the silence of voters largely unaware of the potential injury to their voting rights," the DOJ said in a statement. "A perfunctory administrative proceeding to consider evidence produced by a mass mailing does not turn an otherwise prohibited systematic process into an ‘individualized’ removal.”

The DOJ argues that undeliverable mail may not exactly mean that an individual’s change in residence impacts their eligibility to vote. The election officials are expected to obtain evidence, per the NVRA.

“Election officials must send the voter the opportunity to confirm or rebut evidence of a possible change of residence that would render the voter ineligible to vote in the jurisdiction.” 

Advertisement

Related:

DOJ NAACP VOTING

Such “second-hand evidence” does not justify the cancellation of voter eligibility.

The agency also notes that officials are not permitted to purge voters within 90 days of an election.

An emergency hearing on the lawsuit was scheduled for Wednesday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement