Ruben Gallego's Trip to Colombia Casts More Doubt About His Talking Points on...
Florida’s DCF Took Their Children—and the Supreme Court Just Turned Its Back on...
Trump Administration Just Made the Most Significant Drug Policy Change in Decades
Wisconsin's Lt. Governor Vows to Craft State Budgets in Secret If She Succeeds...
Audit Shows Seattle Followed the California Model of Dealing With Homelessness
Detroit Is So Far Gone, Officials Are Begging Criminals Not to Steal These
Not One Democrat Supports Michigan's House Judiciary Committee Efforts to Protect Kids Fro...
A Loophole in Pennsylvania Law Allowed a Registered Sex Offender to Become a...
That Thing That Never Happens Happened Again, and a Mexican National Faces Deportation...
What America Can Learn From Australia About Treating Veterans With MDMA
SPLC, Swalwell, and the War for America's Minds
Tennessee Town Benefits From Strong Gun Industry Protections in State
Chuck Schumer Gets Put in His Place After Claiming Nobody Respects ICE or...
President Trump's Trump Card: Kharg Island
The SPLC Owed Us an Apology -- A Federal Grand Jury Just Handed...
Tipsheet

DOJ Sides With North Carolina NAACP in Voter Registration Lawsuit

DOJ Sides With North Carolina NAACP in Voter Registration Lawsuit

Last week, the North Carolina NAACP accused the state of discriminating against minority voters by canceling over 100 voter registrations. County officials voided these registrations because mailings were being returned as undeliverable. Yet, the NAACP claims their action was in violation of the National Voting Registration Act and has decided to pursue a lawsuit.

Advertisement

The group has found support from the Obama administration's Department of Justice. The agency agrees that the county election boards are clearly in violation of the NVRA.

“[T]he purge program at issue here rested on a mass mailing and the silence of voters largely unaware of the potential injury to their voting rights," the DOJ said in a statement. "A perfunctory administrative proceeding to consider evidence produced by a mass mailing does not turn an otherwise prohibited systematic process into an ‘individualized’ removal.”

The DOJ argues that undeliverable mail may not exactly mean that an individual’s change in residence impacts their eligibility to vote. The election officials are expected to obtain evidence, per the NVRA.

“Election officials must send the voter the opportunity to confirm or rebut evidence of a possible change of residence that would render the voter ineligible to vote in the jurisdiction.” 

Advertisement

Related:

DOJ NAACP VOTING

Such “second-hand evidence” does not justify the cancellation of voter eligibility.

The agency also notes that officials are not permitted to purge voters within 90 days of an election.

An emergency hearing on the lawsuit was scheduled for Wednesday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos