Biden Beams While Admitting Kamala’s Crushing Defeat
Implosion: Kamala’s Top Campaign Operative Deletes X Account
How a Blue-Collar Billionaire From Queens Became a Man of the People
How to Lose a Campaign in 9 Easy Steps
The Issue That Drove the Amish to the Polls in Pennsylvania
Massachusetts Governor Vows to Defend Illegal Immigrants From Trump's Mass Deportation Pla...
New York Democrat Rep: The ‘Far Left’ Helped Trump Win Reelection
By the Way, Pro-Lifers Scored Some Statewide Victories on Tuesday
Leftists Look to Loot As 'Reparations' for Kamala's Election Loss
Republicans Are Confident They'll Keep Control of the House. Here's Why.
Jimmy Kimmel Isn't Handling Harris’ Election Loss Well
Scott Jennings Has a Reminder for Angry Dems Promising to 'Tie Up' Trump...
Black Voters Have a New Nickname for Harris After She Fled on Election...
Jen Psaki Loses Her Mind Over Trump's Win
Americans Rejected the Harris-Walz Radical Abortion Campaign
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Sides With Landowners In Blow to Obama Admin's Environmental Agenda

The White House’s Clean Water Act requires property owners to surrender possession of land that falls under its jurisdiction. The law, which has frustrated landowners for 40 years, was expanded last year when the Obama administration issued new rules for which bodies of water can be claimed as government property.

Advertisement

Hawkes Co., Inc. was one of the businesses affected by the White House’s environmental guidelines. The company, which provides peat for golf courses, was prevented from using property in Marshall County, Minnesota, because it had been deemed federally controlled wetlands by the United States Corps of Engineers. The Supreme Court took up the case last December.  

On Tuesday, the justices ruled in Hawkes’ favor, declaring that landowners have the right to seek judicial review – and it was unanimous.

The court’s eight justices agreed in Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc. that the Corps’ final “jurisdictional determination” regarding a peat mining company’s wetlands is a “final agency action,” and the company can challenge it like any regulation.

Pacific Legal Foundation, which had represented the company in court, said the victory proved landowners were no longer at the “mercy” of the government.

“Everyone who values property rights and access to justice should welcome this historic victory,” PLF Principal Attorney M. Reed Hopper said in a statement.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement