Be Armed and Ready – the Asymmetrical Battlefield Could Be Here at Home
Women’s Sports Just Aren’t As Entertaining As Men’s Are
This Iranian-American Dem Just Shamed Her Party About the Airstrikes and Trump on...
Pete Hegseth, Vindicated (Part Deux)
Punctuated Living
The New American Century
The Law
The Left Is Petrified That Trump Will Succeed in Iran and Expose them...
'Hanoi' Jane Typifies Hollywood Idiocy
FDA Cruelly Holding Up Approval of Treatments for Rare Diseases, Despite Children Likely...
10 Reported Dead After Pakistanis Attempt to Storm U.S. Embassy
Trump Calls on Iranian Military to Lay Down Arms or Face Certain Death
Thomas Massie Joins in With Democrat Allies Who Claim That Iran Strikes Are...
Miami Man Gets 4.5 Years in Prison for Possessing 450 Stolen or Counterfeit...
Illegal Immigrant Sentenced to 19 Years Over Alleged $4M Romance, Business Scams
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Sides With Landowners In Blow to Obama Admin's Environmental Agenda

SCOTUS Sides With Landowners In Blow to Obama Admin's Environmental Agenda

The White House’s Clean Water Act requires property owners to surrender possession of land that falls under its jurisdiction. The law, which has frustrated landowners for 40 years, was expanded last year when the Obama administration issued new rules for which bodies of water can be claimed as government property.

Advertisement

Hawkes Co., Inc. was one of the businesses affected by the White House’s environmental guidelines. The company, which provides peat for golf courses, was prevented from using property in Marshall County, Minnesota, because it had been deemed federally controlled wetlands by the United States Corps of Engineers. The Supreme Court took up the case last December.  

On Tuesday, the justices ruled in Hawkes’ favor, declaring that landowners have the right to seek judicial review – and it was unanimous.

The court’s eight justices agreed in Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc. that the Corps’ final “jurisdictional determination” regarding a peat mining company’s wetlands is a “final agency action,” and the company can challenge it like any regulation.

Pacific Legal Foundation, which had represented the company in court, said the victory proved landowners were no longer at the “mercy” of the government.

“Everyone who values property rights and access to justice should welcome this historic victory,” PLF Principal Attorney M. Reed Hopper said in a statement.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement