What Happened, Mr. President? | Bill O'Reilly
20 Reasons To Dislike The Democrat Party | John Hawkins
Outside Money Could Change Massachusetts Senate Race | Heather Ginsberg
Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point | Michelle Malkin
Acting IRS Commissioner Doesn't Know Who's Responsible, Objects to "Targeting" as "Pejorative" Term | Guy Benson
Boom: Obama Administration Knew of IRS Targeting in June of 2012 | Guy Benson
CBS News: Benghazi Counterterrorism Response Team "Ruled Out From The Start" | Guy Benson
Surprise: Obama Poised to Promote Susan Rice | Guy Benson
Recommend this article
The Manchester Union-Leader has endorsed Newt Gingrich, which pretty firmly establishes the former speaker as the chief "not-Romney" candidate.
Either man is an infinite improvement over the current occupant of The White House, but there is plenty about which the GOP electorate should be informed before following the Union-Leader's advice to vote for Gingrich.
Yesterday, the Washington Post ran a story about how Newt Gingrich made his money in the wake of his resignation from Congress. The story is a textbook blueprint as to how "regular Americans" come to Congress as people of modest means, and leave quite rich, courtesy of their government connections. His career is a textbook example of the dynamic that Sarah Palin rightly decried in her recent Wall Street Journal op/ed, which would make any endorsement of Newt Gingrich coming from her (as rumored last week) highly ironic.
No, politics shouldn't become the exclusive province of "the rich" -- and yes, I am aware that Mitt Romney is quite rich. All that said, it's worth noting that he earned most of his wealth himself, through the private sector, and entered politics after making a name for himself elsewhere.
Recommend this article
