Here's My Unpopular Outlook on the Midterms
The Graham Platner Nazi Tattoo Story Just Got Worse
SAVE America Before Excuses Become Surrender
Belfast Is Burning, and the Media Won't Say Why
Endgames With Iran and Its Proxies
The Great Electricity Rip-Off: Why Your Bill Keeps Going Up
Gordon Wood and the Historians Who Told the Real Story of the Founders
Blue-State Blues: Why Pro Sports Teams Are Fleeing High-Tax, High-Crime Cities
Through the Strangers' Eyes
Democrats Will Become All One Thing or All the Other
Pete Buttigieg Left America’s Aviation System Offside
Educators and Congress Need to Resuscitate the Student-Athlete
This Move From The AMA Could Make Having A Baby Even More Pricey
Contractors, Execs Pay $21.3M to Settle Fraud Scheme Targeting Disabled Veteran Business P...
Two Former Utah Court Clerks Arrested for Allegedly Helping Illegal Alien Escape ICE
Tipsheet

The "Just Trust Us" Congress

The "Just Trust Us" Congress
The Hill is reporting that Democrats intend to delay a decision about whether to renew the Bush tax cuts until after the election.  Charitably, the Hill insists that the decision means that voters "won't know" the status of their tax burden when they go to the polls. 
Advertisement


I'd beg to differ.  Politicians who intend to cut taxes generally do so to curry favor with voters before the election.  There's no reason to wait until afterwards unless, of course, they anticipate their decision will be unpopular -- or, in other words, that they intend to impose a heaping helping of new taxes on Americans.  

Remarkably, Senator Harkin predicts that the issue will be confronted in the Congress' lame-duck sessions, after the elections.  As I've argued before, deliberately postponing important legislative decisions until after there is a realistic chance of electoral accountability for them is a sleazy tactic, and deeply corrosive of democratic governance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement