It Is Right and Proper to Laugh at the Suffering of Journalists
For Epstein Victims and Members of Congress, It’s Time to Put Up or...
Axios Is Having a Tough Go of Things This Week, and Media Are...
The Brilliant 'Reasoning' of the Left
The Decline of the Washington Post
Ingrates R’ Us
Jeffries and Schumer Denounce Trump's 'Racist' Video — but Who Are They to...
NYC Needs School Choice—Not ‘Green Schools’
Housing Affordability Is About Politics, Not Economics
Is It Cool to Be Unpatriotic? Perhaps — but It’s Also Ungrateful
A Chance Meeting With Richard Pryor — and Its Lasting Impact
What’s Next After That $2 million Detransitioner Lawsuit Win?
Focus Iran’s Future on Democracy, Not Dynasty
California Campaign Adviser Sentenced to 48 Months in PRC Agent Case
19 New York City Residents Reportedly Freeze to Death After Mamdani Changes Homeless...
Tipsheet

Now They Tell Us - Part 703

The  NY Times' David Leonhardt reveals the dirty little secret behind ObamaCare:  It will ultimately involve denying care to Americans when someone (presumably, in the government) decides that care will not be "cost effective."  As Leonhardt admits:
Advertisement


From an economic perspective, health reform will fail if we can’t sometimes push back against the try-anything instinct.

When it's your child, or spouse, or parent who's at risk, it's not going to be terribly reassuring to hear that some options will simply be characterized as a "try-anything" gambit and refused because of their cost. 

And the end game is decidedly ugly.  As Leonhardt puts it:

Eventually, we may well have to decide against paying for expensive treatments with only modest benefits.

'Scuse me, but doesn't that sound eerily like the possibility of a death panel for Grandma -- at least if her treatment gets too "expensive" and the benefits to her are deemed to be "only modest"?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement