After This Answer From ActBlue's CEO, Republicans Should've Expected This Wouldn't Go Well
Here's What Karmelo Anthony's Mother Said Outside the Courthouse Following Her Son's Guilt...
California Just Showed Why Gun Control Is Racist
The AP Amazingly Declares in Court It Does Not Need to Follow Its...
Ignore All of the World Cup Meltdowns; This German Road Trip Account Marveling...
Spencer Pratt Isn’t Laughing at Jimmy Kimmel’s 'Jokes'
Here's What Victor Davis Hanson Has to Say About Graham Platner's Victory in...
Rep. Ro Khanna Just Went All-In on Graham Platner
Democrats' Struggle With Men Reflects a Deeper Cultural Disconnect
CENTCOM Confirms U.S. Resumes Strikes on Iran After Helicopter Shot Down
Democrat Rep. Summer Lee Says Equity Policies Are Only a Threat to White...
Romanian Man Sentenced to 5 Years, Ordered to Pay $11M for Walmart Card-Skimming...
Republicans Add to Narrow House Majority With New Member
Here's How Much Oil Went Through the Strait of Hormuz Under a 'Secret...
Philadelphia Teachers Just Admitted the Real Reason Behind the Failure of the Public...
Tipsheet

The Obama Media Blitz

The Obama Media Blitz
So President Obama provided interviews to five different news shows airing today.  Here are two observations:

First, it's interesting that his aides think that
Advertisement
the numerosity of the appearances will contribute to a "buzz" factor, according to the New York Times.  Really?  But isn't that "buzz" likely to be restricted to the people -- like New York Times journalists -- whom the President has already in his back pocket?  What regular American is going to be persuaded, or even influenced, by the fact that the President is conducting five -- rather than one, two, three or four -- Sunday news talk interviews?  Is The White House staff so trapped inside its own little New York-DC political-media axis that they don't realize that most people won't really care?

Second, it's noteworthy that the President has declined to appear on Fox.  Why refuse an opportunity to appear on the channel where'd he'd be most likely to reach outside his core constituencies?  The whole episode comes across as unbecomingly petulant -- if President Bush had refused to talk to every news outlet that he had felt was unfairly critical of
Advertisement
him, he'd have had nowhere but Fox to appear. 

The decision suggests that Obama is willing to "reach out" -- but only on his terms, on his territory, where he can be assured of relatively friendly questioning and a largely sympathetic hearing.  That hardly bespeaks confidence, does it?  And the fact that he's willing to put his own personal animosity toward Fox ahead of what might be the best strategy for promoting his own health care "reform" seems to signal a pretty strong sense of entitlement and a not-entirely-wholesome process of priority-setting.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos