Gavin Newsom Funded an NGO That Brings HIV-Positive 'Migrants' to America
Anti-ICE Protesters Are Stalking Federal Employees in Minneapolis
Newsweek Runs Headline on Story It Calls Unverified, and the Press Dumping on...
'They Just Care About Power.' Scott Jennings Lays Out What Virginia Redistricting Was...
California Sees Drop in Homicides. There's A Reason for That and Leftists Won't...
Vivek Ramaswamy Slams Critique of Israeli Aid and Some People's Odd Obsession With...
A Virginia Circuit Court Has Just Ruled The State's New Congressional Map Unconstitutional
Here's Why The Situation In Iran is Looking Disastrous For China
Pennsylvania Woman Accused of Selling Pandemic Unemployment Approvals to Ineligible Claima...
New York Times Podcast Calls Shoplifting 'Political Protest' and Defends the Killing of...
Trump's Chief of Staff Reportedly Tells Cabinet Members to Focus on Domestic Issues...
High-Tech Car Thieves Used Key Fob Devices to Steal Over 130 Vehicles, Feds...
Navy Secretary Phelan Exits Administration Immediately, Is Replaced With Hung Cao
DOJ Files Complaint Against DC Water Over 200-Million-Gallon Sewage Spill into Potomac Riv...
Five Romanians Charged in $1M Scheme to Steal SNAP Benefits From Low-Income Families...
Tipsheet

“Prop 8” Ruled Unconstitutional- For Now

“Prop 8” Ruled Unconstitutional- For Now

In a 2-1 ruling on Tuesday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned “Prop 8”, which banned same-sex marriages in California. The ban was put in place by the 2008 referendum on the issue after a state Supreme Court legalized the marriages; 52.30% of voters were in favor of the proposition.

Advertisement

In the majority opinion, Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote:

“Proposition 8 serves no purpose, and has no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California, and to officially reclassify their relationships and families as inferior to those of opposite-sex couples.”

The decision upheld a lower court’s ruling in 2010 by former Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker. Walker’s own sexual orientation, publicly disclosed after he retired, led some to question whether the judge should have recused himself in 2010; the issue was again brought up by some conservative groups last spring, which delayed the ruling.

Though the decision is what American Foundation for Equal Rights President Chad Griffin calls “a historic victory”, same-sex marriages won’t resume immediately.

Opponents, including senior counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, Brian Raum, want to see the issue brought to a larger 9th Circuit panel and to the U.S. Supreme Court:

Advertisement

Related:

CALIFORNIA

"We are not surprised that this Hollywood-orchestrated attack on marriage — tried in San Francisco — turned out this way. But we are confident that the expressed will of the American people in favor of marriage will be upheld at the Supreme Court."

Since Californians did vote in favor of Proposition 8, we’ll just have to wait and see whether it’s the people or the courts that have the final say.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement