It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
Lisa Murkowski Got Cooked by This Community Note Over Her SAVE Act Stance
House Dem Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About the DHS Funding Fight
Georgia Is Trying to Prevent a 'Renee Good' Situation in the State. It...
RFK Revealed Why He Wasn't Scared of COVID...It Was a Legendary Answer
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
Tipsheet

No, Carly Fiorina is Not an Anti-Vaxxer

No, Carly Fiorina is Not an Anti-Vaxxer

As probably the most vocal pro-vaccine writer on this website, my eyebrows were raised when I read tweets Thursday indicating that GOP presidential candidate Carly Fiorina was soft on the issue of vaccines.

Advertisement

Small problem: That's not at all what she said.

From the Washington Post:

"When you have highly communicable diseases where we have a vaccine that's proven, like measles or mumps, then I think a parent can make that choice -- but then I think a school district is well within their rights to say: 'I'm sorry, your child cannot then attend public school.' So a parent has to make that trade-off."

This is current policy in the United States. Children may be exempted from vaccines for medical reasons in all states, and can be exempted for religious reasons in all but Mississippi, West Virginia, and California. An additional 18 states allow for "personal belief" exemptions to skip vaccines and still attend public schools. Parents are still free to refuse to vaccinate their children, but doctors are still free to refuse them as patients and public schools are allowed to refuse them to enroll.

Advertisement

Parents who make the choice to not vaccinate in a state with no personal belief exemptions (and who don't want to pursue a religious exemption) can do one of two things: enroll their child in a private school that does not have vaccination requirements, or home school them. That's precisely what Fiorina said.

Fiorina's objection to vaccines was centered entirely around the HPV vaccine. The HPV vaccine protects a woman against genital warts (which can lead to cervical cancer), which are spread through sexual contact. HPV is not like the measles, which is spread through the air, or mumps, which can be spread through incidental contact (the NHL learned this the hard way this year). A person walking in a public place has no chance of casually contracting genital warts, but as several unvaccinated patrons of Disneyland learned earlier this year, they can indeed come down with the measles.

So no, Fiorina is not an anti-vaxxer, and it is dishonest to portray her as one. She isn't pandering for votes--she's echoing the current law.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement