The Graham Platner Nazi Tattoo Story Just Got Worse
Wait, Did Trump Just Clinch a Deal With Iran?
Black Commentator Has the Solution for the 'White People Problem' in America
Florida Supreme Court Hands Dems a Massive Loss in Fight Over New Congressional...
This Guy Wanted Jerry Seinfeld to Say 'Free Palestine' After the Knicks Game....
Hakeem Jeffries Wants to Focus on the Economy but His Fellow Democrats Are...
Lawrence O'Donnell Backs Iran Over U.S.; Bill Kristol Frets a Trump Takeover of...the...
Democrats Can’t Even Admit CA Elections Aren’t Secure, and That’s the Real Problem
This Move From The AMA Could Make Having A Baby Even More Pricey
Contractors, Execs Pay $21.3M to Settle Fraud Scheme Targeting Disabled Veteran Business P...
Two Former Utah Court Clerks Arrested for Allegedly Helping Illegal Alien Escape ICE
Former Staffer for Abdul El-Sayed's Senate Campaign Charged in University of Michigan Thre...
Brooklyn Daycare Director Allegedly Stole $2.75M to Fund WWE Trips, Luxury Goods
Reflection Pool Renovators Got a Special Treat From Trump As the Capital Prepares...
Virginia Grocery Store Owner Sentenced to Nearly 3 Years for $2.1 Million Food...
Tipsheet

The "Compromise": Just Hard, Raw Politics

The "Compromise": Just Hard, Raw Politics
Below, Katie outlines the substance of the ObamaCare contraception/abortifacient "compromise" that really isn't one (how can there be a true "compromise" if both sides haven't agreed to it?).
Advertisement

But even setting that aside -- even if the compromise were somehow acceptable and mutually-agreed-upon -- it's worth pointing out that the administration isn't trying to compromise because it now respects liberty of conscience.  It isn't trying to compromise because there's a new understanding of (though not agreement with) Catholic (or other religious) morality about abortion and contraception.  Instead, it's trying to compromise only to stanch the self-inflicted, hemorrhaging wound the President created through his approval of draconian rules that constitute an assault on religious freedom in America.

Here's the takeaway, whatever the purported "compromise" looks like: Obama -- and the other liberals like him -- are willing to trample conscience rights and religious liberties in order to impose their vision of "the good" on Americans.  What everyone should keep in mind is that this crowd was willing to ride roughshod over religious belief and religious pluralism in this country.  If they fail, it's only because they were forced to retreat.

In fact, from a purely political perspective, the administration's only "mistake" was taking on headlong an adversary -- the Catholic Church -- big enough, wily enough, principled enough and tenacious enough to fight back effectively.  It's a good thing for our cherished First Amendment religious rights that they did.  Had the administration picked a smaller, less experienced or less vocal faith to attack, too many of us might not have been alert to the danger until it was too late.
Advertisement

Then again, it isn't entirely surprising.  There is some very ugly anti-Catholic sentiment that occasionally manifests itself among the liberal "intelligentsia" (as this repugnant Santorum hit piece reveals -- HT: Hugh Hewitt), and it's hard not to suspect that this ugly sentiment lurks in the hearts of at least some of those most determined to implement the abortifacient/contraception-mandating ObamaCare regs.  Perhaps it's time for us all to have as open a discussion on the evils of anti-religious bigotry as we do on the evils of racism, sexism and homophobia.

The real question for Americans is: How can we trust an administration that has shown such a stunningly contemptuous disregard for religious principles with which it disagrees -- and religious liberty in general?


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement