There's Nothing Like John Fetterman Sitting on a Bench Brushing Off Pro-Hamas Protesters
Why Speaker Mike Johnson Is Here to Stay
Is This the Cringiest Kamala Harris Interview?
OnlyFans Star Claims Biden Administration Paid Her to Spread Propaganda
What Triggered Nancy Pelosi's Meltdown on MSNBC Yesterday
The Left Wants to Play Stupid Games
Behind The Scenes: FBI Surveillance And The Truth About Protest Monitoring
Four Radical Reforms to Shrink the Federal Budget
Trump Held in Contempt for Violating Gag Order. Here's the Penalty.
Columbia Issues Warning to Students and Staff After Pro-Hamas Agitators Occupy Building
RFK Jr. Qualifies for Ballot in Another State
Here's How Members of Congress Are Responding to Reports ICC May Issue Arrest...
U.S., Mexico, Vow to Crack Down on Illegal Border Crossings
Surprise, Surprise: Pro-Hamas Agitators on Campus Have a New 'Demand'
Oversight Chair James Comer Is Right to Challenge Biden’s Bureaucratic Hiring Spree
OPINION

Bridging the no-new-taxes divide

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Democrats insist that any debt deal must include new revenues. Republicans say no way.

The differences seem irreconcilable, the hopes for a deal all but dead.

Advertisement

But they’re not.

Politicians can always finesse the way they inject new money into the government bloodstream — and what they call it.

A short list of revenue ideas, floated for weeks among congressional leaders and the White House, points to some wiggle room behind the black-and-white positions — and therefore, more leeway for a deal than the rhetoric suggests.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/58944.html#ixzz1S5d5ByCN

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos