Reports out of Nevada contend that homeboy and U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s biggest problem is ... Harry Reid.
Dragging in home-state polls with Bush-like disapproval ratings, Democrat Reid faces re-election in 2010.
“Reid’s numbers are never very good,” said Eric Herzik, political science professor at the University of Nevada, Reno, “and his elections are always tight.”
Herzik said Reid is not beloved in Nevada: “He is powerful and respected, but he also has very harsh critics in the state … even among Democrats.”
Until the last election cycle, Nevada has been a fairly even split between Democrats and Republicans. Thanks to aggressive voter registration during last year’s early party caucus, Democrats now outnumber Republicans by 100,000 registered voters.
“That surplus, and the fact that the Republican Party is in disarray, is about the only good news for Reid,” said one inside-the-Beltway Democrat strategist who is from Nevada and considers Reid a “disappointment.”
One thing hurting Reid is that his state is changing. Anytime you have an established, old-school politician in a dynamic state with thousands of people moving in who have no historic affiliation toward their U.S. senator, it’s a problem.
“To win, you need a connection among the new voters,” said Jon Ralston, a Las Vegas pundit, “which is difficult to achieve when the candidate is charismatically challenged.”
Also hurting Reid is Nevada’s economy. His traditional role of delivering the bacon helps, but Nevada hovers between No. 1 and 2 in the nation in foreclosures, Las Vegas is tanking economically and construction projects are being canceled for the first time in anybody’s memory.
“Nevada has been hurt by the economic downturn more than any other state in the country,” said Herzik, citing a recent Rockefeller Center Report showing Nevada way ahead of the national downturn.
Then there are those “Reidisms” – stunning proclamations that give staffers acid reflux, such as the time he surrendered the war in Iraq by saying it was lost. Or when he said “coal makes us sick” while Obama was trying to win the Appalachia vote. Or his very vocal refusal to seat Illinois Democrat and senator-designate Roland Burris, who was sworn in Thursday as a U.S. senator following a 180-degree turn by Reid.
“Oh, he did not look good in that,” said Herzik. “The coal issue really doesn’t hurt him here, but the ‘war is lost’ has had lingering effects even though the saliency of the issue has dropped.
“But Burris, and the failure to get the votes against warrant-less wiretaps, were not … his finest moments.”