14 Years Ago Today, The Giants and Jets Faced Off...and Put One Team...
Four Years Ago, Some Patriot Dropped an Epic Line on a Call With...
DK Metcalf Just Lost a Lot of Money for Punching a Detroit Lion's...
Merry Christmas, Over a Million More Files Potentially Related to the Epstein Case...
Supreme Court Ruled on Trump's Use of National Guard In This Blue State
Christmas Eve With J.R.R. Tolkien
2025 Media Malpractice Recognized With the Heckler Awards Pt. 2 — The Individual...
Bari Weiss Is Everything Today’s Journalists Hate
Another Left-Wing Judge Just Decided He's Got More Authority Than President Trump
Popular Neo-Nazi to Campaign Against Vivek Ramaswamy in Ohio Gubernatorial Race
Stephen Miller Blasts CBS for Sympathizing With Criminal Illegal Immigrants
Federal Judge Blocks California Policy Forcing Schools to Hide Gender Transitions From Par...
98 Minnesota Mayors Warn of Fiscal Fallout After State Spends $18 Billion Surplus
ICE Agents Fired at Incoming Van in Maryland
Federal Judge Rules That Michigan Cannot Disrupt International Line 5 Pipeline
Tipsheet

Dereliction of Duty

How many flavors of crazy is it for President Obama and Democrat leaders to continue the forced march toward a vote on a health care bill despised by the majority of Americans?  The
Advertisement
New York Times lays out what's happening:

Leaving a meeting of the House Democratic Caucus, lawmakers said they had received few details about what would be in the [health care] legislation, on which they may be asked to vote in the next week or two.

Got that?  This is legislation that would remake fully 1/6 of the US economy, and the House members who are being pushed to vote on it aren't even sure about what's in its final version.  How, under any circumstances, can voting in favor of this -- given the rush, the uncertainty about the bill's contents, not to mention its effects (and including the widespread, fierce opposition to it) -- be anything other than a dereliction of duty?

Pat Caddell and Doug Schoen warn that passing the legislation will be a political disaster for the Democrats.  Frankly, the point is so obvious that it's frightening that it needs to be made.

But the bigger problem now, for Democrats, is that their interests and President Obama's diverge.  Many Blue Dogs can save themselves (and their party) if they take a principled stand against ObamaCare.  But the President needs
Advertisement

Related:

HEALTH CARE
this victory -- in a sense, just to stay in the game.  Without it, he's revealed as politically impotent.  With it, he can at least comfort himself with his "historic" expansion of the welfare state.

Overall, though, the President's in trouble either way this goes.  Even if he wins, he's paid a heavy price.  First, he's lost the trust of the American people by his willingness to say anythign to get the bill passed; second, he's shown himself willing to ignore the expressed wishes of those he governs; and third, he's revealed himself as arrogant enough to believe that opponents are too stupid to understand what's in the bill -- but once ObamaCare is foisted upon them by the "platonic guardians" in The White House and on Capitol Hill, the ignorant rubes will love it.

A President can come back from political defeat.  Recovering after losing the trust of the people is much more difficult.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos