Possible Maine Senate Candidate Troy Jackson Just Called to 'Get Rid' of People...
There Is a Case of the DNC Hiding Its Financials and the Press...
Rep. Summer Lee Admits She Wants More Black Doctors, Even If They're Unqualified
The 'Extreme Passion' of Socialists Has a Very High Body Count
Kathy Hochul Admits Zohran Mamdani Has Lost Control of NYC's Homeless Problem
Ro Khanna Just Said This About Former Rep. Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush,...
Democrats May Love Socialism, but They Can't Get Enough Luxury on the Campaign...
The Trump Administration Is Planning to Make a Major Move Regarding Legal Immigration
JD Vance Wants to Stop Socialism. A Republican Socialism Isn't the Answer.
Massachusetts Man Sentenced for Collecting Dead Beneficiary's Social Security Checks for Y...
Former Federal Reserve Adviser Sentenced to 38 Months for Lying About Ties to...
Brandon Gill Introduces Legislation Requiring Naturalized Citizens Speak English
Texas Flooding Returns to Camp Mystic Region, Leaving One Dead and Dozens Rescued
The Biggest Foreign Corporate Investment in America Just Got Even Larger
ABC's The View Could Take a Serious Hit From the FCC Just in...
OPINION

Look Back in Liberty 2013

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Look Back in Liberty 2013

This wasn't a great year for liberty. A few disasters that government caused:

--Obamacare. It was supposed to "bend the cost curve" downward. The central planners had lots of time to perfect their scheme. For a generation, the brightest left-wing wonks focused on health care policy. The result? Soviet-style consumer service comes to America.

Advertisement

--Government shutdown. The real disaster was the unnecessary panic over it. Zoos would shut down, and baby pandas would starve. The media made it sound like America might not survive even slightly limited government. They were happy to echo the politicians' claim that there's no wasteful or stupid spending to cut.

"The cupboard is bare," said Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. "There's no more cuts to make."

Nothing to cut? Government spends $3.8 trillion a year!

Many Republicans are almost as eager to spend as Democrats, despite the difference in rhetoric between the two parties. About the only spending reduction Republicans accomplished in the past few years was the so-called sequester -- which really happened by legal default because the two parties couldn't reach an agreement. The sequester instituted cuts of about $85 billion a year, a mere sliver of that $3.8 trillion budget and a still smaller sliver of our $17 trillion debt.

Yet even those modest cuts will not happen now under the new congressional agreement. Because some Republicans were upset the sequester made small cuts to the military's budget and were fearful another partial government shutdown might hurt their chances in upcoming elections, they gave up the modest spending discipline the sequester imposed. Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, said conservatives who want to keep the sequester are "ridiculous."

Advertisement

The Republican behind the new agreement, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., was once called a fanatical budget-slasher who wanted to push Granny off a cliff. People talked about him reading Ayn Rand and being a cutthroat capitalist. But now, even he abandons the meager budget cuts that were already scheduled.

I suppose Republicans feel they have no choice. They face Democrats who will cut nothing . They hope to win the Senate next election and realize that spending cuts are not particularly popular with the general public.

Americans say they want less spending. But then they fight for farm subsidies, flood insurance and "economic development" schemes. Most federal spending funds Social Security, Medicare and the military. Even citizens who sound fiscally conservative, especially elderly ones, don't want these things cut.

--This was also the year we found out just how much the federal government spies on its own citizens. I annoyed my fellow libertarians by saying the privacy I lose to data mining seems a small price to pay for surveillance against terrorism. I posted a list of a hundred other things government does that upset me more. Some people responded by calling me a "traitor" and "LINO" (libertarian in name only).

Look, libertarians, I'm constantly angry at my government for lots of things, but I just can't get worked up about data mining. My emails fly through the air. For all I know, my political enemies already read them.

Advertisement

It is upsetting, though, that the National Security Agency snooping goes far beyond what the government first claimed. President Barack Obama assured us the NSA does not read our emails or listen to our phone calls. But it turns out they sometimes do.

They say they only look for terrorists, and they won't use the records to harass and punish their critics. But why would we trust that the same big government that spends $3.8 trillion a year, raids our homes looking for drugs and regulates almost every part of our lives won't use its snooping powers to look into things other than terrorism?

Given the truth of Thomas Jefferson's warning -- "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground" -- I fear next year will be still worse for liberty.

To make it a better year, we can't trust such a powerful government to restrain itself. We should cut back its duties to reduce its power.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement