Donald Lambro

WASHINGTON - We live in a dangerous and chaotic time when terrorism is rapidly spreading across the globe, Russian troops occupy Ukraine, and America has lost its influence abroad. 

President Obama's handling of foreign policy is coming under increasing criticism at home, from friends and foes alike, for its timidity, impotence and bungling.

As the months race by, Russian President Vladimir has daringly stepped up his invasion of Eastern Ukraine, after seizing and annexing the Crimean Peninsula, threatening at one point to take over the country entirely. 

The former Communist KGB agent casually told his top advisers he could take over Kiev, Ukraine's capital, in two weeks, if he wanted to.

Does Obama and the West need further proof of his maniacal ambitions to rebuild a Greater Russia by taking territory from the surrounding independent countries that were once part of what President Reagan called the Evil Empire?

His cross-border, military invasion has triggered the worst national security crisis in Europe since the Cold War. But Obama has responded with economic sanctions that were so weak, it further emboldened Putin's high wire act. The White House's tepid response confirmed what Putin had long believed: that he faced an inexperienced, foreign policy light weight who had lost the respect of America's now confused and divided European allies.

This week, Obama flew to the Baltic states, in advance of a meeting with European leaders, where they feared their tiny countries, with sizable Russian populations, were next on Putin's list.

But if they expected tough talk from Obama, whose style is to speak softly and carry no stick, they were sorely disappointed. 

Instead, at a news conference in the Estonian capital of Tallinn, Obama delivered an overly cautious statement that sent a pliant message that he didn't fully understand what was at stake here.

Putin, on the other hand, was running rings around the president, announcing a dubious plan to end the conflict that would hold on to the Russian rebels' territorial gains in Southeastern Ukraine.

At a news conference, Putin said that he and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko had reached a settlement on a peace deal. "Our views… are very close," he said. It isn't true, but the gesture was designed to blunt the upcoming meeting of Western allies, while appearing as a man who only desired peace. Sure.

Donald Lambro

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.