Donald Lambro
Recommend this article

WASHINGTON -- In the first two years of his presidency, Barack Obama replaced Teddy Roosevelt's well-advised admonition to "speak softly and carry a big stick" with "be friendly and carry an olive branch."

He planned on sitting down and entering into a "gentlemen's dialogue" with America's enemies, including every tin-pot despot from Iran to North Korea. He was going to try to reason with the world's dictators who are, by definition, well, unreasonable.

Now, in the third year of his troubled term in office, as he enters a tough, two-year presidential election cycle with his polls sinking into the mid-40s, and critics on both sides of the aisle saying he is failing to lead, Obama is suddenly firing Tomahawk missiles and sending stealth bombers into Libya to topple its dictator Moammar Gaddafi from power.

When advisers told Franklin Roosevelt he was not being taken seriously enough by Congress, he asked his aides to "find me a bill I can veto," which he promptly did. Congress got the message.

In an analysis on the front page of Sunday's Washington Post's Outlook section, Obama was unceremoniously portrayed as the "master of ceremonies" who "appears less inclined or less able to assert his country -- or himself -- as the dominant player in global affairs."

By that time, the U.S. air strikes over North Africa had already begun. But it wasn't long before Obama's attempt at regime change in Libya (let's face it, that's what he's attempting here) was turning out to be a lot more difficult than our reluctant commander-in-chief expected.

Obviously, the missile aimed at Gaddafi's compound where he lived wasn't intended to kill Libyan bureaucrats. He wasn't there.

By Tuesday, Gaddafi, who threatened to bathe his country in blood to stay to power, was still shelling the ragtag, poorly armed and unequipped rebels that Obama wanted to save.

From the beginning, his handling of the air war against the Libyan dictator's forces was strange, raising more questions than the White House had answers. While he was sending U.S. ship and air forces into harm's way, he was off on a pleasant tour of Latin America with his family, a series of photo ops and one banquet after another. The U.S. commander of chief had left his country while the war raged.

At a news conference Monday in Chile, he argued that this was not an attempt at regime change, but a humanitarian effort to save civilian and rebel lives from Gaddafi's threat to annihilate anyone who threatened his rule.

While Gaddafi troops were still shooting rebels and civilians in a reign of terror in Benghazi, Ajdabiya and elsewhere, Obama announced that U.S. military action would soon be handed off to the U.S. allies in "a matter of days, not weeks."

Recommend this article

Donald Lambro

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.