He's Back: Trump Returns to the Swamp
We're Glossing Over Something That Cannot Be Ignored Regarding the 2020 and 2024...
How Hakeem Jeffries Responded When Pressed on How Dems Got Taken to the...
Liz Warren Gets Wrecked Trying to Attack Trump's Secretary of Defense Pick
Kids Need Freedom
Watch How KJP Responded When Asked About 'Awkwardness' Between Biden, Harris After Trump...
Hinchcliffe: 'I Apologize to Absolutely Nobody'
How RFK Jr. Just Gave the American People a Voice in Choosing Political...
Besty Devos Responds to Trump's Plan to Dismantle the Department of Education
Humiliation: Everyone Admits Bob Casey Lost...Except for Bob Casey
Jack Smith to Resign Before Trump Inaugurated
'The View' Co-Host Goes on Unhinged Rant About Nikki Haley's Support for Trump
There's More Financial Concerns With Kamala Harris' Campaign, This Time to Do With...
End of the Nutball Era
An Open Letter to JB Pritzker
OPINION

Saying 'Merry Christmas' Is Very Important

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

The nearly universal change from wishing fellow Americans "Merry Christmas" to wishing them "Happy Holidays" is a very significant development in American life.

Advertisement

Proponents of "Happy Holidays" argue that it's no big deal at all, and that proponents of "Merry Christmas" are making a mountain out of a molehill, especially when proponents say that the substitution of "Happy Holidays" is part of a "war on Christianity."

But the "Happy Holidays" advocates want it both ways.

They dismiss opponents as hysterical while, at the same time, relentlessly pushing to rid America of "Merry Christmas."

So, then, which is it? Is the substitution of "Happy Holidays" for "Merry Christmas" important or not?

The answer is obvious.

It is very important. That's why the anti "Merry Christmas" crowd has worked so hard to make this greeting a thing of the past.

And they have been extraordinarily successful.

I have been wished "Happy Holidays" by every waiter and waitress in every restaurant I have dined; by every one of the young people who welcome me when I go to the gym; by every flight attendant and pilot on every one of my flights; and by every individual I have dealt with on the phone.

When I respond "Thank you. Merry Christmas," I sometimes sense that I have actually created some tension. While many of those to whom I wish "Merry Christmas" may actually be happy that someone felt free to utter the C-word, all the sensitivity training that they've had to undergo creates cognitive dissonance.

Advertisement

"Christmas" has also been eliminated by many -- probably the majority -- of our elementary schools, high schools and universities. Thus, for example, they no longer have a "Christmas vacation," but a "winter vacation."

The opponents of "Merry Christmas" and other uses of the word "Christmas" know exactly what they are doing. They are disingenuous when they dismiss defenders of "Merry Christmas" as fabricating some "war on Christianity."

Of course it's a war on Christianity, or more precisely, a war on the religious nature of America. The left in America, like the left in Europe, wants to create a thoroughly secular society. Unfortunately, most people do not realize that the left believes in secularism just as fervently as religious Christians believe in Christ.

That's why "Merry Christmas" so bothers the anti-religious left. It is perhaps the single most blatant reminder of just how religious America is -- and it must therefore be removed from public discourse. Here's a safe prediction: The ACLU and other secular activists on the left will eventually move to have Christmas removed as a national holiday.

The left doesn't announce that its agenda is to thoroughly secularize America. Instead activists offer the multiculturalist argument -- that saying Christmas, as in "Merry Christmas" or "Christmas party" or "Christmas vacation" is not "inclusive."

Advertisement

This inclusiveness argument plays on Americans' highly developed sense of decency. Most Americans don't want to gratuitously offend other Americans, so the inclusiveness argument has been effective.

But the argument is preposterous. Who exactly is being excluded when one wishes someone "Merry Christmas?" Non-Christians?

I am a non-Christian. I am a Jew. Christmas is therefore no more a religious holy day for me than Ramadan. But I am an American, and Christmas is a national holiday of my country. It is therefore my holiday, though not my holy day, as much as it is for my fellow Americans who are Christian. Irving Berlin, an American Jew, wrote "White Christmas" as a celebration of an American holiday, his holiday. By not wishing me a Merry Christmas, you are not being inclusive. You are deliberately excluding me from one of my nation's national holidays.

But even if Christmas weren't a national holiday, I would want companies to have Christmas parties, schools to continue to have Christmas vacations, and pilots to wish their passengers "Merry Christmas." Just because I don't personally celebrate Christmas, why would I want to drop the word "Christmas" from public discourse when Christmas is celebrated by 90 percent of my fellow Americans?

Advertisement

It borders on the misanthropic, not to mention mean-spirited, to want to deny nearly all of your fellow citizens the joy of having their Christmas parties called Christmas parties or force them to replace "Merry Christmas" with "Happy Holidays." A majority-Christian country that treats non-Christians so well deserves better.

Narcissism, misanthropy, meanness and ingratitude. That's what the leftist campaign against "Merry Christmas" and "Christmas parties" boils down to.

So, say "Merry Christmas" and "Christmas party." If you don't, you're not "inclusive." You're letting the real-life Grinches win.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos