Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Sandy Rios :: Townhall.com Columnist
More Trouble Outside the White House Than In
by Sandy Rios
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the 'Ricci' decision hurt Sonia Sotomayor in the confirmation process?


No one can be surprised that a messiah figure promising change beat a senator flailing at earmarks. No one cared about John McCain’s earmarks, my friend. No one was inspired by his insistence that Barack Obama was an “honorable” man or assured by his dismissal of “some old terrorist,” named William Ayres.

They were inspired instead when the “warrior princess” began to fight the real battles the tired, old soldier was unwilling to engage.

While Sarah Palin called out the “old terrorist,” McCain smiled and shrugged. While Palin fought to make drilling for oil the legitimate issue it was, McCain insisted he knew more about ANWR than Alaska’s governor and clung to his PC opposition. And, in an attempt to further demonstrate his magnanimous reach across the aisle, he vowed to include the genius Al Gore on any Global Warming initiative his administration might advance. Inspiring.

While people were given an opportunity to vote on how they actually felt about men marrying men and women marrying women in three states, McCain was reluctant to mention the issue. Loathe to defend the sanctity of marriage between a man and woman? Unwilling to expose his opponent’s radical opposition against giving the people a vote? Remarkably, both Florida and California went for Obama and against homosexual marriage. Did those voters know where Barack stood on this issue? Did they understand his stated intention to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act in order to usher in homosexual marriage state by state? Who would have told them except Obama’s opponent, John McCain? But marriage was not worth fighting for. The important issue was earmarks, my friend … earmarks.

While a huge percent of Americans—Democrats, Republicans and Independents alike—continue to oppose amnesty and benefits for illegal aliens, John McCain refused to make it a campaign issue. Do the citizens of the United States know Obama supports driver’s licenses for illegals? Medical benefits? Open borders? Do they know that of the so-called 44 million uninsured, millions are illegal immigrants? No, because McCain refused to mention it. He was more concerned about demonstrating his compassion to illegals than defending his country against their overwhelming demands.

When an attendee at a Wisconsin McCain/Palin rally stood up to declare, “I’m mad! Fight for us!” McCain delivered his trademark Beavis and Butthead laugh, offended at the challenge, not even comprehending the gravity of the moment. The nation at crisis, he thought the race was about him.

“Fight with me!” McCain famously urged at the Republican Convention, but we quickly discovered he perceived the fight to be for his shot at the presidency, not the preservation of the union. If he had really understood the dangers, how could he have remained cavalier and unserious about so many important issues?

A loss for McCain meant a return to the rich privileges of the Senate, a beautiful, millionaire wife and plenty more opportunities to fight earmarks and reach across the aisle. While the nation reels from his weakness, we were the ones who lost, not he.

As McCain met with the president-elect this week, speculation grows on a cooperative, bipartisan effort to bring citizenship and benefits for illegal immigrants. And since all campaign promises are off and the great compromiser still boasts of supporting leftist Supreme Court Justices David Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg we can likely look forward to seeing him champion more bad nominees, more illegal immigration, more foolish global warming initiatives and more attention-getting gimmicks to demonstrate his maverick madness.

I voted for him out of self-preservation, but I would not have been proud of my candidate if this misguided lion lacking courage had made it to the White House. Still, I fear he will do more damage outside the White House than inside, and that, my friend, is a bi-partisan reach we could live without.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Sandy Rios is a Fox News contributor and host of the "Sandy Rios Show", heard weekdays from 3 to 5PM on WYLL AM1160 in Chicago.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
McCain didn't want it bad enough
Senator McCain just didn't want to President bad enough to sell his product of why he was the better candidate than Barack Obama on taxes, gun control and illegal immigrants. That is why the Republicans lost the election. No guts no glory. Being a softee on your opponent is a boxer fighting his opponent with one hand tied his back. Palin in 2012.

THANKS LC FOR THE IMMIGRATION WEBSITE
I went to this website http://www.numbersusa.com. It has a lot of good information on the illegal imigration problem and presents initiatives that should be taken to correct the problem. I suggest anyone who is interested in the illegal immigration problem should visit this website.

Our annual costs to provide free health care, education, welfare, apprenhension and housing of criminal illegal alliens is over $300 Billion a year. 30% of all of our federal prisons are illegal immigrants. They send approx $45 billion back to their homeland each year. The worst of it is the costs of lives of legal Americans that are caused by the illegal criminal element, most with prior records, as happened in Houston last week with two deaths; 3 months ago in California with 3 deaths in one family; in San Antonio and LA it happens monthly.

I lived and worked in the Czech Republic for 2 years. The very first thing I was advised to do upon arrival was to ge my work permit, which I did. I would have been removed from the country within 90 days without a work permit. It should not be too difficult for the USA to develop a legal work program either. At least we would know who had crossed our borders.

Our "good government" has turned a blind eye to this situation long enough. Amnesty is not the answer. Quote from Numbersusa
"In closing, the testimony noted that the chairman of the Commission on Immigration Reform, the late Barbara Jordan, testified before the House Sub-Committee on Immigration on Feb. 24, 1995. She said:
"Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave."

13 years later and no resolution yet! Why?

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.