News reports in the past few days suggest that as a priority after he
assumes the Presidency on January 20, 2009, President Barack H. Obama
will use the power of the executive order to re-impose the ban on
drilling for oil and natural gas offshore which President George W. Bush
lifted in July and Congress allowed to expire in September of this year.
Leaving aside all disputes about the constitutionality, scope, wisdom
and so forth of Presidential executive orders, I would urge the
President-elect to reconsider his position for a variety of reasons.
America has enough untapped natural gas, oil and coal within our borders
and off our coasts to ensure that the majority of our energy is produced
in America. We never will be entirely self-sufficient in energy, nor
would such a quasi-mercantilist system be desirable, but producing the
majority of our energy here would benefit our economy tremendously by
creating many more jobs, decreasing the cost of energy and allowing us
to put more of our money back into American development.
It also would free us from an over-dependence upon numerous unstable and
authoritarian regimes, which frequently put us at their mercy
financially by tinkering with the oil supply. Reliance upon American
energy would starve these governments of much of the cash they need to
maintain their power, thus providing the potential to bring about
positive change in the Middle East, Central and South America, and
Eastern Europe.
A permanent end to the ban would contribute to the common good of
American society. This is an idea which has been neglected far too often
in American politics in recent decades as the self-serving interests of
identity politics have grown in strength. Yet it is an idea to which we
must return if we are to remain a viable democratic republic.
How would an increase in American-produced energy benefit the common
good? By decreasing the cost of energy. This would help all sectors of
society-businesses, non-profit organizations, churches, the rich, the
"middle-class," the poor, Black, White and everybody else. It is worth
noting that if, as he claims, the President-elect is concerned about the
plight of the poor, a significant reduction in energy costs would
benefit poor people more than anyone else, as they have the smallest
financial margin of error in their household budgets.
It is true that the cost of gasoline has decreased in recent months. But
because the United States does not use all our resources and
consequently is susceptible to forces beyond our control, the price
could begin to increase again at any time, especially if the
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) reduces its output.
I would urge President Obama to govern for the common good, not
according to leftist ideology. Every American gains when offshore
drilling is permitted. By the way, ANWR drilling also is beneficial.
|