Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Paul  Weyrich :: Townhall.com Columnist
Offshore Drilling, Value Over Liberal Ideology
by Paul Weyrich
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


News reports in the past few days suggest that as a priority after he assumes the Presidency on January 20, 2009, President Barack H. Obama will use the power of the executive order to re-impose the ban on drilling for oil and natural gas offshore which President George W. Bush lifted in July and Congress allowed to expire in September of this year. Leaving aside all disputes about the constitutionality, scope, wisdom and so forth of Presidential executive orders, I would urge the President-elect to reconsider his position for a variety of reasons.

America has enough untapped natural gas, oil and coal within our borders and off our coasts to ensure that the majority of our energy is produced in America. We never will be entirely self-sufficient in energy, nor would such a quasi-mercantilist system be desirable, but producing the majority of our energy here would benefit our economy tremendously by creating many more jobs, decreasing the cost of energy and allowing us to put more of our money back into American development.

It also would free us from an over-dependence upon numerous unstable and authoritarian regimes, which frequently put us at their mercy financially by tinkering with the oil supply. Reliance upon American energy would starve these governments of much of the cash they need to maintain their power, thus providing the potential to bring about positive change in the Middle East, Central and South America, and Eastern Europe.

A permanent end to the ban would contribute to the common good of American society. This is an idea which has been neglected far too often in American politics in recent decades as the self-serving interests of identity politics have grown in strength. Yet it is an idea to which we must return if we are to remain a viable democratic republic.

How would an increase in American-produced energy benefit the common good? By decreasing the cost of energy. This would help all sectors of society-businesses, non-profit organizations, churches, the rich, the "middle-class," the poor, Black, White and everybody else. It is worth noting that if, as he claims, the President-elect is concerned about the plight of the poor, a significant reduction in energy costs would benefit poor people more than anyone else, as they have the smallest financial margin of error in their household budgets.

It is true that the cost of gasoline has decreased in recent months. But because the United States does not use all our resources and consequently is susceptible to forces beyond our control, the price could begin to increase again at any time, especially if the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) reduces its output. I would urge President Obama to govern for the common good, not according to leftist ideology. Every American gains when offshore drilling is permitted. By the way, ANWR drilling also is beneficial.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Paul M. Weyrich is the late Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Paul Weyrich's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

His will be done
Obama will go through with this. Pelosi tried it months ago but the election and the financial crisis got in her way. What a bunch of idiots? We have the most environmentally friendly, responsible drilling in this country but they would rather pollute the world thru other country's drilling. I'm sick of even thinking about their insane reasoning.

Obama's energy ignorance
Barack Obama has quickly demonstrated that he is in thrall to the extremists who now dominate the environmentalist lobby. It was also clear that the congressional legislation to lift the offshore oil drilling restrictions was a temporary smokescreen to dupe the American people before the election. On energy, the Democrats (socialists) are clueless.

Pending the discovery of some future source of energy, we will never again achieve energy independence, but we can achieve a large measure of energy resilience if we adopt the right policies. Chief among these are the pursuit of oil and natural gas within our own borders and off our own coasts, of coal, and the embrace of nuclear energy (which Obama opposes).

We will continue to be dependent on oil for the remainder of this century, and the sooner we realize this, the more sensible our energy policy will be. Wind and solar will in no way replace fossil fuels, particularly in the short term. The precipitous rush to wind and solar, combined with the restrictions on drilling and nuclear, will dramatically increase energy costs for average Americans and do drastic damage to the American economy. Few have contemplated the environmental impact of a landscape blanketed by relatively inefficient wind generators, but Europeans have. This is why countries like Denmark have put a moratorium on their continued installation.

In response to the global warming alarmist fraud, our irrational drive to rapidly reduce greenhouse gases will constitute an enormous case of economic masochism for which future generations will revile us.

The "all of the above" approach of McCain and Palin was the correct response (short of McCain's pandering to the global warming crowd). We must let market forces dictate our energy future. The problem with liberals (socialists) is that they, like children, are motivated by a combination of irrational fears and the desire for instant gratification.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.