Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, January 21, 2008
Paul Greenberg :: Townhall.com Columnist
Martin Luther King: The Radical as Conservative
by Paul Greenberg
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


After he was gone, a new black intelligentsia arose that knew not Martin. His would not be the name embroidered on the baseball caps of another generation. The legacy of Martin Luther King Jr. would give way to the frustrations of a Malcolm X, the demagoguery of a Louis Farrakhan, and the general hucksterism of the Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons.

Today, any black leaders who don't adhere to the party line - a Ward Connerly or Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell - are called traitors to their race. Others are dismissed as "not black enough" because they reach out to all of us. This is the new racism, and it needs to be called such.

A new intolerance divides us by Race and Gender, and into Minority and Majority. It strives to make many out of one. It's called multiculturalism, and it reverses that most American of mottos: E Pluribus Unum.

But the light can be blinked only so long. John Marshall Harlan's old ideal of a color-blind Constitution still shines, and begins to be reflected in Supreme Court decisions - and in a general American indifference to racial appeals. Barack Obama runs for president not as a black candidate but as one more choice, and does well. Indeed, he demonstrates daily that a black presidential candidate can be as vacuous as any other. It's progress of a sort.

You can tell a lot about an age by the heroes it chooses. While the Malcolms and Farrakhans come and go in favor, Martin Luther King Jr. remains the standard by which all other leaders are measured, and not just black leaders. That's a hopeful sign.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Apparently Godlilocks can't read
Where are you getting this stuff about Runyon? Have you actually read the opinion? Obviously, if you have, you're seeing things so I will offer some quotes from the opinion:

Held: Section s1981 prohibits private, commercially operated, non-sectarian schools from denying admission to prospective students because they are Negro...The racial discrimination practiced by petitioner amounts to a classic violation of s1981...

Held: Section s1981, as applied in this case does not violate Constitutionally protected rights of free association and privacy, or a parent's right to direct the education of his children.

Held: While under the principle that there is a 1st Amendment right to engage in association for the advancement of beliefs and ideas, it may be assumed that parents have the right to send their children to schools that promote the idea that racial segregation is desirable, and that the children have the right to attend such schools, it does not follow that the practice of excluding minority students is also protected by the same principle. The Constitution places no value on discrimination, and while invidious discrimination may be characterized as a form of excercising freedom of association protected by the 1st Amendment, it has never been afforded affirmative constitutional protections.

Held: While parents have a constitutional right to send their children to private schools that offer specialized instruction, they have no Constitutional right to provide their children with private school education unfettered government regulation.

The opinion goes on, but nowhere does it say anything about the schools in question receiving gov't funds, and specifically states that private schools are not exempt from the applicable laws. Additionally, it makes clear, that their decision is specifically based on s1981 which prohibits discrimination based on race.

goldilocks
Just wanted to point out the facts. You were mistaken and misinformed, which is a hallmark of cons. One day when you pick up a book, you will become a Democrat.

We will agree to disagree. I will make sure to vote your party out of power, by the way.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.