Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Mike Adams :: Townhall.com Columnist
Better is One Day in Your Courts
by Mike Adams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



TO: UNC-Wilmington Students
FR: Mike Adams

Welcome back! I am so glad to start another semester here at UNC by the Sea. I just got back from teaching at Summit Ministries in Manitou Springs, Colorado. I also had some time off last week, which I spent considering some new policies for the new semester. There will be several minor as well as two major changes this semester. The purpose of this email is to explain the first of the two major changes in class policy.

On my day off last week, I pulled up a chair on the front porch of the old hotel, which serves as Ground Zero for Summit Ministries. I got a cup of coffee and opened a book knowing full well that I would not finish either before being interrupted by Summit students. They love to ask questions of the various speakers they hear during the two-week program.

Culture of Corruption by Michelle Malkin FREE

The first student that came by shared his conversion experience. He said that experience took place in two steps. First, he had a “heart” conversion brought about by his mother’s death. Next, he had a “head” conversion brought about by his intensive study of theology. I told him my story was similar. We talked about whether conversions just as often happen in the opposite way – “head” before “heart.” We also talked about whether one was “better” than the other in terms of enhancing one’s likelihood of maintaining a belief in God. We talked for almost an hour.

The next student came by to compare notes on some recent books he read – books by authors like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens. We talked about the reasons why Christians often read the works of atheists and why atheists are often afraid to read the works of Christians. I argued that, historically speaking, that hasn’t always been the case. It’s just that the new generation of atheists is less confident than previous generations of atheists. It was an awesome conversation that took up another hour.

A young couple joined me later to talk about the purpose of worship and church attendance. The young woman asked whether I thought preachers should spend more time telling us what to do or what not to do. I asked her to imagine that she was married. I also asked her to imagine her husband coming home from work every day and asking her whether she had committed adultery. Then I asked her to imagine him giving her a high five when she said “no, honey.” We laughed at the imagery but she got my point. There’s more to a good marriage than following the basic rules. And there’s much more to the Christian life than just following – or trying to follow – the proscriptive commandments. After about a 30-minute conversation the couple went to see the next speaker.

Later that night, Wesley and Brianna sat down for a couple of hours to read and talk and drink coffee much later at night than we should have been drinking coffee. Wesley was reading philosophy and Bri was practicing her Spanish with an English/Spanish Bible. We had a good talk about marriage and how people can forgive a cheating spouse and stay married even though they don’t have to. I shared the story of a man who converted to Christianity – and even became a minister – after his Christian wife forgave him.

At eleven p.m. I went to the kitchen for my eleventh cup of coffee. A staffer named Ryan said he noticed I was talking to his friend Bri and asked for my impressions of her. My answer to Ryan, which took the form of a question - has implications for all of my UNC students. That’s why I’m repeating it here in an email to all of you: “Ryan, are you asking whether Bri made a good impression in relation to students at Summit Ministries or in relation to the students I teach at the secular university?”

I went on to tell Ryan that I have more (and a greater number of) intelligent conversations with Summit students in a single day than I do with my UNC students over the course of a year. I’m not telling you this because I want to be critical. I’m telling you this because I want to do something about it.

Students who attend UNC by the Sea are very different than the ones I teach at Summit. The former are not likely to have been home schooled. And relatively few attended private schools. So, as products of the public school system, they have spent little time discussing spiritual matters. Most of their teachers are fearful of offending the ACLU.

Furthermore, students at UNC by the Sea are confronted, from the first day, with a number of unconstitutional speech codes, which reinforce the notion that they are actually prohibited from discussing spiritual matters. These speech codes are most fervently supported by those who claim allegiance to the notion of a “wall of separation” between Church and State. But, in practice, these codes have established Secular Humanism as our university’s established religion. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Mike Adams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Belief in GOD
I would rather acknowledge my belief in and worship of GOD and be wrong than to deny the existence of GOD and be right.

Thankfully, I have no doubt that GOD does exist and his love is everlasting.

Can you imagine the horror faced by the souls of those who choose to ignore or deny HIS existence? But more to the point, have these individuals ever given real thought to what their souls will be facing when they find themselves standing before GOD and forced to defend their refusal to believe? At that time, GOD will show as much compassion to them as liberals do to those innocent babies they condemn to abortion.

To 13-Bravo, part 2 (end, for now)
I meant no disrespect to anyone who believes that global warming is not human-induced. The climate models are so complex that it's possible something is very wrong (for example, they recently discovered a HUGE cloud of CO2 over a Brazilian rain forest). But warming is measurable, from mean sea temperatures to melting glaciers, to animal/vegetable migrations. It may be a short-term blip. Or it may not. I do NOT advocate destroying the entire economic system because there MIGHT be human-induced global warming. But, if it might wipe out much of civilization eventually, it seems worth studying, no?

I think you misinterpreted by remark about quantum mechanics, etc. You had a good reply: that global warming theory is being used "against us". I never really thought of it that way because, to me, it's a theory, like any other, and is either supported by data, or not, in the SAME way quantum mechanics or plate tectonics (which was WIDELY ridiculed for decades, as it turns out) are. While I respect people's rights to hold any opinion they wish to, when they decide to attack an entire scientific edifice, there are very, very high standards of evidence, and very few of us, myself included, are really capable of taking it all in.

Finally, my "credentials" are completely irrelevant. They were brought up because another poster (whom I consider to be a mendacious troll) made a huge deal out of saying that I was "lying". As I also said before, I've known many thousands of PhD scientists, and quite a few are loons. One of my freshman roommates at MIT was an exceedingly stupid person (so much so that my mother, who didn't graduate high school, talked to him once on the phone and then said to me "There's something wrong with this guy, no?"). And my grandmother, who couldn't read or write, raised 6 children on her own after her husband died suddenly. THAT is intelligence in my book.

afriKa
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.