Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Michael Reagan :: Townhall.com Columnist
Smart Power or Just Dumb Policy?
by Michael Reagan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton told fellow senators during her confirmation hearing that the United States needs to follow a foreign policy of what she called "Smart Power."

Sounds impressive, doesn't it? And just what does it mean? It means whatever you want to think it means. It's not a policy; it's just a slogan that sounds good. And who would want to be labeled an opponent of "smart power" even if they hadn't the vaguest idea of what it means?

What the honorable members of the Senate need to do is delve a little deeper into the kind of foreign policies Mrs. Clinton and Team Obama propose to implement or have followed. When you do that you're apt to run smack into an awful lot of stupidity.

A big part of the "smart power" she talks about is the imposition of sanctions on nations that are acting against our interests or threatening world peace or otherwise getting in our face.

Sanctions, Mrs. Clinton must realize, only work when all the other countries in the world honor them. The "oil for food" program is one good example.

We put sanctions on Saddam Hussein, but the corrupt officials of the United Nations involved in the "oil for food" program made sure that despite the sanctions Saddam got everything he needed, and they made a bundle of money in the process.

The real "smart power" would have been to trust the United Nations while also verifying that they and the Iraqis were doing what they were supposed to do. As my Dad said, "Trust but verify." The Clinton administration simply trusted, period.

Liberals like Hillary Clinton think a policy of "smart power" would have been to fail to put those Pershing missiles in Western Europe aimed at the Soviet Union during the Cold War. To their minds it would have been a dangerous provocation instead of a shield that protected Western Europe against armed Soviet aggression.

Under their definition of "smart power," calling the Soviet Union the "Evil Empire" would have been verboten because it might have offended the tender sensibilities of the murderous thugs in the Kremlin. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Reagan, the eldest son of Ronald Reagan, is heard daily by over 5 million listeners via his nationally syndicated talk radio program, “The Michael Reagan Show.”
smart
Did someone change the definition of smart when I wasn't looking. Oh, that's right, it's right next to the new definition of "is".

Look, what ever the Democrats are doing, is working. Fake smiles and fancy catch phrases work. Smirks, duh's, and poor english don't work. Bush stepped on the english language almost a much as rap music.

We are getting the government we asked for. We voted for liberal Republicans and we got the Liberals then selves. The real deal. Happy yet?

Oh, really?
"And Bush allowed the terrorists to attack the World Trade Center (again), kill American troops in Iraq, attack London and Madrid, and allow Osama bin Laden to go unpunished.'

How so? President Clinton refused (more than once) to do anything about OBL when he had the chance. His insistence on treating terrorists like conventional criminals made him fail, and showed weakness to Bin Laden and the rest of Al Queda, who perpetrated or at least inspired ALL of the horrible events you TRY to blame on President Bush.

As for killing American troops in Iraq, our service members don't go there to die, and they do know that their primary purpose for being in the military is to fight to defend our country if need be. And, yes, taking the fight to Al Queda (instead of letting them bring it here again) is precisely that.

If Presidents Clinton AND Carter (widely acknowledged as the father of modern jihadism) hadn't been such weak-suck Presidents, we probably wouldn't be in this mess at all. Clinton promised severe retribution after each attack (e.g. the Cole), and never actually did anything substantial. This showed Bin Laden that we weren't to be taken seriously.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.