Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, April 17, 2009
Michael Gerson :: Townhall.com Columnist
Red Faith, Blue Faith
by Michael Gerson
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



WASHINGTON -- Is "Christian America" dying? And if so, should we mourn or cheer?

These questions, raised in a recent cover story written by Newsweek editor Jon Meacham, opened a vigorous and continuing debate (note: I am an occasional contributor at Newsweek). The article has been peppered with criticism from religious conservatives who say it demonstrates the anti-religious bias of the mainstream media. This reaction actually demonstrates something different: that it is easier to read a headline than it is to read an article.

The Newsweek cover declaring "The Decline and Fall of Christian America" was provocative in a typical, newsmagazineish sort of way. The serious essay that followed stated that the proportion of Americans who describe themselves as Christians (76 percent) has declined since 1990 -- which is true. That the percentage of Americans reporting no religious affiliation (15 percent) has increased -- which is undeniable. That the religious right has become less influential and less triumphalistic over the last several years -- and that this is positive for religion in general, which can become diluted and discredited by identifying too closely with any ideology, social order or nation.

The religious right, at least in its cruder expressions, is indeed a phenomenon without a future. A younger generation of evangelicals and their leaders, while generally remaining culturally conservative, tend to view the religious right's model of social engagement as too narrow in focus and too negative in tone. And the loose language of creating or re-creating a "Christian America" has always been a heresy, a historical error and a blunder. A heresy because no human kingdom, however admirable, can be properly identified with the Kingdom of God. A historical error because the federal government has been wisely nonsectarian from its beginning -- its laws informed by religious values while establishing no single, official religious tradition. A blunder because the conflation of faith and ideology can politicize, nationalize and thus diminish the appeal of faith itself.

So Meacham's arguments are accurate, even wise -- but they also are incomplete. John Green, a polling expert at the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, qualifies the Newsweek findings in several ways:

First, the rise of the religiously nonaffiliated is a trend -- but a very gradual one. According to Green, there is "no real difference between 2000 and 2009" on this measure. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Gerson writes a twice-weekly column for The Post on issues that include politics, global health, development, religion and foreign policy. Michael Gerson is the author of the book "Heroic Conservatism" and a contributor to Newsweek magazine.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Michael Gerson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Where Does Religion Begin?
When my stepfather was a child (ca 1910) he was not asked to "pass the potatoes" at the dinner table---instead, he was told, "Look around and see if anyone needs anything". If I were to say where I think religion should begin, it would be the same---Look around and see if anyone needs anything. Who is in need? Who is lonely?Who is suffering emotional pain? Who requires our care? And what can do we do to help?

This seems to set me apart from conservative Evangelical Christians who (as I understand them) begin religion by looking for external rules to follow and to force others to follow. Meanwhile, the gay neighbor is snubbed, the young woman who had an abortion is shunned, the elder who can't get to the store is ignored, the mentally ill living in the park are despised, and they believe that, in Glenn Beck's words, "we should make the poor uncomfortable in their poverty [so they will strive to get out of poverty]". I don't see compassion or empathy or even kindness, let alone Christian charity, in the harsh attitudes of certain Evangelicals who post to this board. "What ye do unto the least of these, ye do it unto me." Comments about illegal immigrants (or even about all immigrants), about gays, about those arguing for legal and safe abortion, about the poor, sometimes about Democrats or liberals in general, and about President Obama, often sound more cruel than Christian.

To Gestell
You think it was a failure of our Founders that they didn't establish a single state religion? My ancestors could have explained matters to you. 1) My Huguenot (French Protestant) ancestors got chased out of France by a Catholic Church/government coalition that declared open season on Protestants. Google "St Bartholemew's Day Massacre" for details. 2) My Wesleyan Methodist ancestors went from Ireland to Canada for the same reason my English Quaker ancestors went to Pennsylvania: because state churches looked the other way when they were beaten up, thrown out of their jobs, and turned out of their homes in their native lands. 3) My German Baptist ancestors were not allowed to enjoy many of the benefits of citizenship because they rejected the Baptism of infants (the Lutheran Church was the state religion), preferring to baptize members who accepted Baptism knowingly (as Baptists did and do)).

Catholic, Lutheran, Church of England, Presbyterian---all were established as single religion state churches that did not respect freedom of worship. Our folks crossed 3000 miles of open sea in small ships then many walked another 1000 miles behind an oxcart, while getting shot at by Indians, and many did so seeking freedom of religion. The LAST thing they would have supported was a single state religion.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.