Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, January 23, 2009
Michael Gerson :: Townhall.com Columnist
Inaugural Joy and Inaugural Bitterness
by Michael Gerson
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Any American with a sense of history should feel that sense of awe. Minorities of every background must feel it most deeply. As the father of multiracial children, I feel it deeply enough.

But there was a second, less sympathetic, Obama enthusiasm at work. In a Newsweek essay, Michael Hirsh mentioned Obama's racial achievement. But he went on to say that "there's something else that I'm even happier about -- positively giddy. ... What Obama's election means, above all, is that brains are back." Hirsh declared that the Obama era means the defeat of "yahooism" and "jingoism" and "flag-pin shallowness" and "religious zealotry" and "anti-intellectualism." Obama is a "guy who keeps religion in its proper place -- in the pew."

There is much to unpack here. Can it be that Hirsh is "even happier" about the advance of liberal arrogance than he is about the advance of racial justice? And would the civil rights movement have come at all if African-American religion had stayed "in the pew"? But suffice it to say that some wish to interpret the Obama victory as a big push in the culture war -- as an opportunity to attack their intellectual and cultural "inferiors."

Most of us have witnessed this attitude, usually in college. The kids who employed contempt instead of argument, who shouted down speakers they didn't agree with, who thought anyone who contradicted them had a lower IQ, who talked of "reason" while exhibiting little of it. They were often not the brightest of bulbs. Most people recover from this childish affliction. Some do not.

President Obama showed unfortunate hints of this attitude during the campaign, in criticizing those who "cling to guns or religion." But he won the presidency, in part, by effectively blunting this edge of disdain -- by extinguishing the culture war with his soothing manner and pragmatism instead of igniting it with liberal arrogance and bitterness. And that kind of ideological smallness is perhaps the greatest threat to the broad coalition of Americans Obama will need in the coming days of challenge.

So this week I stand firmly with Lewis' joy and against Hirsh's contempt. And I offer my own inaugural prayer: God bless President Obama -- and God save him from some of his supporters.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Gerson writes a twice-weekly column for The Post on issues that include politics, global health, development, religion and foreign policy. Michael Gerson is the author of the book "Heroic Conservatism" and a contributor to Newsweek magazine.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Michael Gerson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
I seem to remember arrogant liberals
getting involved with that movement too.

"And would the civil rights movement have come at all if African-American religion had stayed 'in the pew'?"

Liberals have such terrible, progressive agendas. Now they're elitely insisting on equal rights for gay people. And asserting that everyone has a right to health care. They should be ashamed of themselves. Not.

And as far as unfair ridicule of Bush, this liberal first reacted to his appointment to the presidency hoping for the best. I didn't blame him for 9/11. I thought he did the right thing when he sent troops into Afghanistan. But I knew he was opening a broad highway to fail when he rammed through the pre-emptive attack on Iraq. I knew it would be disastrous to expand fighting in the Middle East while cutting taxes. I saw that he was secretly taking away our rights under the guise of "protecting" us. I worked hard to get Kerry elected, and was utterly dismayed that 51% of Americans clung to this loser. I was so thankful when his attempt to privatize Social Security (which he didn't even understand himself) did not succeed. Imagine how much worse the economic plight of many would now be if it had succeeded! I was so angry that he refused to change ANYTHING about our tactics or leaders in Iraq until his hand was forced by the Iraq Study Group and the Democratic congress in 2006. Since then he's pretty much sat on his hands, emerging once in a while to shame us by doing something like administering unrequested back rubs to female world leaders or bragging about how the U.S. is the biggest polluter at a meeting meant to come up with plans for reducing global pollution.

How could I not enjoy the small pleasure of ridiculing the man who was driving our country over a cliff with me as a helpless passenger? I'll be the first to ridicule Obama if he appears to be trying to destroy the U.S.

Cry Me a River (pt.2)
Gerson refers to Barack Obama’s infamous remark that some people “cling to guns or religion”. That sounded pretty crackpot and more than likely wrong, but it’s quite a non-sequitur to go from the inevitably complex issues invoked by “guns or religion” to “disdain”. I think Obama was theorizing that some people tend to interpret events through the lens of worldviews defined either by gun control conspiracy-theory paranoia, or more familiarly, religious fundamentalism. True or not, how did what is basically a left-right issue get to be an up-down issue?

In the past 8 or 16 years, the behavior of conservatives toward their political opponents can only be described as bullying. “Disdain” is not quite the main feeling one gets in the face of such treatment, nor in vindication. This is not about heaping scorn upon all those humble yet well-educated albeit churchgoing folks out there in small-town America. If joy is expressed that “brains are back” it means in comparison to those Republican elites who had been running the country, as well as the usual suspects on Fox News and talk radio along with their legions of Dittoheads. So cry me a river. If you’re reduced to saying, “You think you’re better than me”, then you’ve pretty much run out of arguments.

http://www.squeakywheelsblog.com

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.