Charter schools in minority areas show even greater promise, according to a 2004 study by Harvard economist Caroline Hoxby:

“Students of charter schools in Hispanic areas have a 7.6 percent advantage in reading, and charters in African-American areas have a 4.5 percent advantage, compared to a 4.2 percent advantage for students in charter schools in other areas.”

It’s not as counterintuitive as it sounds. It is precisely challenging student populations that require the innovative methods and special attention charter schools can provide.

It’s already worked wonders at Atlanta’s Tech High School, which was started four years ago by Georgia’s conservative think tank and opened without a nasty political fight thanks to backing by a bipartisan team of well-respected politicians.

Tech High School has all the hallmarks of a low-performing high school—except the actual grades. Now graduating its first class of seniors, 70 percent of its population is eligible for free or reduced lunch, and it gets only about 70 percent of the funding per student that the rest of Atlanta’s public schools get.

“A lot of our students said they couldn’t learn where they were,” said then-Tech High CEO Barbara Christmas in 2005. “It shocked them to see how much they didn’t know.”

Since then, a mixture of motivated teachers, high expectations and special attention has catapulted those same students to the top of the pile in Georgia. Their end-of-grade testing reveals that they solidly outperform Georgia schools of the same demographics and come out in the top echelon of Atlanta Public Schools and on par with average scores across Georgia.

Georgia’s 71 charter schools met federal requirements for progress in testing this year at a rate of 85 percent and graduated 90 percent of their students, but there remains resistance. Local school boards rejected 25 of 27 charter school applications in 2007.

Not all charter schools are as successful as Georgia’s. Ohio’s charters were subjected to a crackdown from the state government in 2007 when their spotty records forced evaluation by a new Democratic administration. Some have theorized that Ohio’s open charter school laws allowed too many schools to open too quickly without enough oversight.

Labor unions and liberals point to Ohio’s troubles as proof that charter schools are untrustworthy, but the very fact that there are consequences for their failure is a reflection of what can make them more effective than public schools with no such worries.

Charter schools are just one piece of the education reform puzzle, but it’s incumbent upon conservatives to point out to our liberal friends and local teachers’ unions that the gifts of accountability, flexibility and innovation have often proven better “for the children” than that greatest of inefficient liberal gifts—a huge pile of cash with no strings attached.

This article is from the May issue ofTownhall Magazine.  To subscribe to twelve issues of Townhall Magazine and receive a free copy of Andrew McCarthy’s Willful Blindness:  A Memoir of a Jihad, click here.