Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login | What's Hot
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Ken Connor :: Townhall.com Columnist
When Does a Baby Get Human Rights?
by Ken Connor
Forward Print Share Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


"At what point does a baby get human rights, in your view?"  Most people have a ready answer to this question.  A "pro-life" supporter will generally point to conception, while a "pro-choice" proponent will often point to birth.  There are a variety of opinions, but the average person does have an opinion.  Not Barack Obama.  He wouldn't answer this most basic question about human rights.

Senator Obama's response to Reverend Rick Warren's question during the Saddleback Civil Forum on the Presidency was, "Well, I think that whether you're looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade."  He went on to state that he is "pro-choice", but that both sides should "find common ground" by seeking to "reduce the number of abortions."  Still he refused to answer the question of what constitutes a human being worthy of rights and protections.

You would think a man who studied at Harvard and Columbia and who is running for the office of President of the United States would have taken the time to figure out his position on this controversial question.  After all, abortion remains one of the most polarizing issues of our time.  This single issue is dispositive—one way or the other—for millions of voters.  Perhaps that accounts for the ambiguity.

If Mr. Obama is ambiguous about the issue, the scientific evidence is not.  Science demonstrates unequivocally that life begins at conception.  Within 24 hours after fertilization the human egg begins to divide, producing more and more cells.  Through this process, the embryo and the outer membranes which nourish and protect it are formed.  When the egg is fertilized, 23 chromosomes from each parent join to form the 46 chromosomes of a unique new person.  These chromosomes will dictate many of the child's physical characteristics, including sex, eye and hair color, height, and even intelligence to some extent.  This process is simple, yet profound, and it occurs at conception.

Notwithstanding the uncontroverted scientific evidence, Senator Obama insists he simply is not qualified to form an opinion on when a baby becomes a human.  Perhaps his refusal to answer the question is rooted in a desire to hide the implications of his voting record.  While in the Illinois Senate, he first voted against the Induced Infant Liability Act, and later refused to bring it forward in committee for a vote.  This Act would have mandated medical care for babies who survive an attempted abortion (they are "born alive"), and it would have prevented hospitals and doctors from putting these babies aside to die.  The national version of this bill—the Born Alive Infant Protection Act—passed through the U.S. House with only fifteen dissenting votes, and it passed through the U.S. Senate unanimously.  Even the extremist abortion advocacy group NARAL Pro-Choice America did not oppose passage of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act.  Nevertheless, Senator Obama, proving to be more extreme, opposed the Illinois bill, thereby denying legal protection for these babies.

Refusing medical care to babies who are born alive after a failed abortion is infanticide, plain and simple.  Barack Obama's rhetoric and voting record indicate he believes otherwise.  The Senator, who once equated having a baby to being punished, feels that denying a woman and her doctor the right to kill her newborn child would wrongly burden the woman.  He summed up his opposition by saying, "What we are doing here [with this bill] is to create one more burden on a woman and I can't support that."

Senator Obama's voting record doesn't end there.  In the Illinois Senate, he opposed the partial-birth abortion ban, and in the U.S. Congress he co-sponsored the Freedom of Choice Act which would have removed nearly all state and federal restrictions on abortion.  He also voted against legislation in Congress which would have required an abortionist to notify the parents of an underage girl seeking an abortion.  If Senator Obama is incapable of determining when a baby gains human rights, why is he capable of making these weighty legislative decisions?

Truth be told, Senator Obama appears to have preferred bobbing and weaving to offering a straight answer.  A straight answer was inevitably going to alienate at least one group of voters who hold strong views.  But is that the kind of leadership America needs?  Ambiguous answers in the face of hard questions?

Please Mr. Obama.  Tell it to us straight.  At what point does a baby get human rights?  Lives depend on the way you answer that question.
Share:
Forward Print Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ken Connor is Chairman of the Center for a Just Society in Washington, DC.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

Join The Debate!

Post Your Comment
(301 comments so Far)
View in ascending order     View in descending order
Reply # 1
Date: Aug 31, 2008 - 12:58 AM EST
WENDY WRITES:

Sir Aslan
"Thank you for your kind defense. We disagree on this issue, but I know you love our great country and value our freedom as do I. I remember locking arms with you to oust that CFR traitor Michael Gerson from Townhall. That was a glorious battle!"

ASLAN WRITES:

Tis true Wendy...twas another glorious battle!..
I am pleased with the Sarah Palin choice for VP and I think she is the greatest but the only thing that kind of spoils it a little is to know that Bill Kristol and Newt Gingrich promoted her as a possible nominee. I don't trust the Neocons like Kristol nor the CFR like Newt Gingrich.....

Wendy...some day we might have to take to the streets...!! in order to preserve our freedoms....the Globalist will not surrender peacefully...traitors like Gerson still post and try to pass for conservative...how disgusting...hang in there...the ride will get a little rough.:O)

Flag as Offensive

Reply # 2
Date: Aug 26, 2008 - 6:28 PM EST
To: Higene #309
I’m sure you’ve moved on, but I must respond to your post. I do NOT agree that there is no current constitutional prohibition of abortion. By this reasoning, murder and rape would not be prohibited either since they are not mentioned in the Constitution.

Even today, women do NOT have an implicit right to abortion. This “right” was explicitly defined by the Supreme Court in Roe vs. Wade and clarified in several cases that followed. It exists solely because of that case. Before then, the right was explicitly defined by each State legislature and would return to each State to handle as they saw fit if the decision were ever overturned.

The Court, in Roe, said in part that if a fetus were to be recognized as “a person”, the decision (to allow abortion) would collapse because “for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the (14th) Amendment.” This is why I always argue that the fundamental question about abortion is not whether the woman has one right or another, but whether the fetus is a person. The Supreme Court got this part right, and this is where the discussion must focus.
Flag as Offensive
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
 *
State:
 *
Zip:
 *
Phone:
       
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.