After This Answer From ActBlue's CEO, Republicans Should've Expected This Wouldn't Go Well
The AP Amazingly Declares in Court It Does Not Need to Follow Its...
Ignore All of the World Cup Meltdowns; This German Road Trip Account Marveling...
Spencer Pratt Isn’t Laughing at Jimmy Kimmel’s 'Jokes'
Here's What Victor Davis Hanson Has to Say About Graham Platner's Victory in...
Nine Convicted in Ohio Drug Ring That Mixed Fentanyl Trafficking With $4.5M COVID-19...
Democrat Calls Republicans Fascists, Wishes He Could 'Run Over' Trump at Congressional Bas...
8 Indicted for Allegedly Threatening University of Michigan Leaders, Jewish Federation
Massachusetts Doctor Sentenced to Nearly 5 Years for Healthcare Fraud, Tax Evasion, Money...
CENTCOM Confirms U.S. Resumes Strikes on Iran After Helicopter Shot Down
Democrat Rep. Summer Lee Says Equity Policies Are Only a Threat to White...
Romanian Man Sentenced to 5 Years, Ordered to Pay $11M for Walmart Card-Skimming...
Republicans Add to Narrow House Majority With New Member
Here's How Much Oil Went Through the Strait of Hormuz Under a 'Secret...
Philadelphia Teachers Just Admitted the Real Reason Behind the Failure of the Public...
OPINION

Lawsuit Reform and the RIght to Trial

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Lawsuit Reform and the RIght to Trial

This article is a response to Lindsay Boyd's Town Hall article, "Lawsuit Climate 2008: The REAL Climate Crisis."

Last week Lindsay Boyd, Townhall.com’s Associate Editor, posted a glowing review of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Institute for Legal Reform’s  recently released “Lawsuit Climate 2008: Ranking the States.” 

Before readers vest too much credibility in this “survey” of the civil justice system in all 50 states, some warnings are in order. 

Advertisement

First, a poll of in-house counsels and senior litigators who represent corporations with annual earnings in excess of $100 million guarantees a remarkably narrow view of state court systems.  After all, these individuals are all responsible for defending corporations against lawsuits.  Not exactly a broad spectrum of opinion!

Further, buried in the “methodology” section of the report is the tacit admission that the attorneys surveyed were not expected to have direct, in-depth knowledge of a state’s court system.

Interestingly, the $100 million corporate earnings floor happens to bring into the survey some of the business interests – notably pharmaceutical manufacturers and insurance companies – that are among the largest financial backers of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and also the most frequent subjects of serious legal claims of negligence and/or misconduct.  Their participation in this bogus “survey” represents nothing more than a very self-interested attempt to undermine confidence in the civil justice system and fuel efforts to raise ever-higher the bar of citizens’ access to the courts.

The U.S. Chamber routinely rails against “greedy trial lawyers,” counting on reflexive support from conservatives in its efforts to undermine the civil justice system.

But conservatives should be wary of buying what the U.S. Chamber is selling.

As a trial lawyer for thirty-five years, I am among the first to admit that the civil justice is imperfect.  But access to the court system is a constitutionally protected right, and at a time of rampant corporate misconduct it is a right that needs to be zealously defended.  Conservatives who believe in the Constitution and the need for checks and balances in our public life should agree.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement