Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Ken Blackwell :: Townhall.com Columnist
Bush's Big Government Gambit
by Ken Blackwell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



Although President George W. Bush succeeded with some of his policies, the bailout of the Detroit Three is possibly his most significant mistake. The recent damage he’s done to the Republican brand will take leadership with a command focus to repair. The president’s mistake could repeat the hardship Americans experienced the last time we went down this path early in the last century.

Setting aside President Bush’s successes on such fronts as protecting the homeland against terrorists, his failures have been noteworthy. Some, such as the federal response to Hurricane Katrina, came about because Mayor Ray Nagin’s incompetence was surpassed only by that of Governor Kathleen Blanco. Others, such as the nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, were entirely his fault.

But the past three months have seen terrible decisions with long-term consequences. As markets declined, President Bush signed onto massive government bailouts of banks, then other financial institutions that started calling themselves banks. Now, he’s agreed to give a massive bailout to three American automakers that have stubbornly persisted in clinging to failed business plans that leave them in the red, strangled into insolvency by crippling union contracts.

To be fair to President Bush, the bailout failure could not have happened without the Democrat-controlled Congress, led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Even Senator John McCain had a hand in this situation.

Polls showed voters were against the first bailout 90-10 when it passed. Subsequent polls had voters opposed to it 75-22 on Election Day. Had Mr. McCain taken the conservative line opposing these bailouts, and criticized Senator Barack Obama for supporting the president’s plan, he would have finished stronger.

But none of that excuses President Bush’s decision to give $17 billion of taxpayer money to the Detroit Three, postponing their need to make fundamental changes to their business models. This giveaway radically expanded the reach of the federal government in a manner only seen in socialist nations. Worse, he attached paltry, optional conditions to that federal largesse, leaving the door open to the next administration to waive those requirements completely and use the GOP for political cover.

Out of all the options available to President Bush, he took the worst-possible course.

His actions may not even be legal. Congress considered this bailout and rejected it, while Mr. Bush’s treasury secretary publicly said that using the original bailout funds for automakers would be unlawful without congressional action. The legality of these actions cannot be challenged unless the right party brings a lawsuit, but the fact that ordinary taxpayers cannot bring a lawsuit against federal spending does not change the fact that everyone agreed the first bailout could not be extended to automakers. President Bush therefore usurped the legislative function, doing something Congress refused to do.

The federal government’s shoulders are not big enough to carry a $13 trillion economy. A system of limited government cannot control enough of our economy to fully stave off the consequences of widespread recklessness. Painful corrections are inevitable. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mr. Blackwell, a contributing editor at Townhall.com, is a senior fellow at the Family Research Council and American Civil Rights Union.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ken Blackwell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Ken
Stop making a fool of yourself. I know this is late, but here are some things that Hoover did to try and use government to save the economy:

The Mexican Repatriotation Act - Forced a half-million Mexicans, including citizens, back to Mexico to "save jobs" for Americans.

Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act - Resulted in a backlash from overseas, thus making imported goods expensive and killing export business.

Federal Home Loan Bank Act - A huge debacle that helped cause the latest mortgage crisis.

Emergency Relief and Construction Act - A huge public works program that FDR expanded on.

Funny enough, which Obama echoed during the election cycle, FDR actually accused Hoover of doing too much, spending too much, and increasing debt. Vice President John Nance Garner, FDR's running mate, accused Hoover of being Socialist. Hoover was also a big proponent of farm subsidies, confiscated 5.3 million acres of lands for parks and national forests, pushed for a Department of Education, proposed Social Security for the first time in American history, built the Hoover Dam (where do you think the name came from). The only person in his entire Hoover Administration that suggested to let the free markets handle it was Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon, who was resoundingly ignored.

Student of history for 40 years? Sleeping through history class for 40 years is more like it.

conservative stupidity
It seems that all conservatives want to attack the U.S. auto workers these days. Of course, the real issue is not wages or pensions (based on the value of the dollar today, Euro-zone and Japanese workers earn more), it is the cost of health care that we have in the U.S.

Our health care costs are due to our governmental policy. We make regulations very strict concerning obtaining medical care, becoming a licensed phyisician, or opening a hospital -- then expect people to be able to negotiate for treatment.

We have gotten rid of pensions in this country -- and we will have massive numbers of poor and lower class older Americans in 10 or 20 years -- pushing us much further towards socialism than if we had reasonable policies (encouraging pensions rather than 401Ks or IRAs).
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.