Don’t Panic About Trump’s Iran Strategy Just Yet
Oh, So That's What Happened to the Karmelo Anthony's Crowdfunding Page
Karmelo Anthony's Lawyer Said *What* About the Guilty Verdict?
We Know When Republicans Plan to Attack Graham Platner. It's a Very Critical...
Wait, Did Jasmine Crockett Really Say That About the Karmelo Anthony Situation?
The Reactions to Karmelo Anthony's Guilty Verdict Are Predictably Out of Control
60 Minutes Correspondent Drops Some Eye Roll-Worthy Remarks About the 'Bloodbath' at the...
Knicks Mount the Largest Comeback in NBA Finals History to Stun the Spurs...
The 60 Minutes Controversy
The War No One Else Is Fighting
Trump Goes to the NBA Finals — Look Who Attacked Him
Children's YouTube Star Ms. Rachel Sings With Kids for Illegal Aliens Outside Newark...
Donald Trump Is Personally Making Antitrust Sane Again
When Abortion Has a Face
Washington's Debt Problem Is Every Investor's Problem
Tipsheet

Just the Facts, Please

Just the Facts, Please
Judge Sotomayor's 60% reversal rate by the Supreme Court is remarkable.  In other words, more than half of the times that she wrote a majority opinion that went to the Supremes on appeal, the highest court in the land said she had gotten it wrong.
Advertisement


There are only two reasons that a judge gets reversed that much.  Either s/he doesn't understand the law, or else refuses to apply it correctly.  It's hard to believe that Judge Sotomayor truly couldn't figure out the law in each of these cases.  Instead, her high reversal rate suggests a willingness-- like that manifested by the oft-reversed Ninth Circuit -- to use the law as an instrument to make policy.

It's worth pointing out that, as a justice, she'll have the chance to do successfully what she apparently tried to do before -- make law from the bench.  There is nothing to constrain a Supreme Court justice in his or her work but an internal commitment to upholding the rule of law -- which means (among other things) pledging impartiality toward litigants, and realizing that the work of judges (even those on the Supreme Court) is supposed to be to interpret the law as it is written, not to rewrite it so as to make it more to their personal liking.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement