Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, January 05, 2009
Janice Shaw Crouse :: Townhall.com Columnist
Girls Need a Dad and Boys Need a Mom
by Janice Shaw Crouse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


The latest issue of The Journal of Communication and Religion (November 2008, Volume 31, Number 2) contains an excellent analysis of the importance of opposite-sex parent relationships. The common sense conclusion is backed up with social science data and affirmed by a peer-reviewed scholarly article: girls need a dad, and boys need a mom.

Not surprisingly, the study also found that communication is an essential building block for all family relationships — family interactions are the crucible for attitudes, values, priorities, and worldviews. Beyond the shaping and modeling of these essential personal characteristics, the family shapes an individual’s interpersonal system and self-identity.

Further, stable homes include specific talk about religion and support for children’s involvement in religious activities. These families create high-quality relationships by specific communication behaviors, such as openness, assurance, and dependency. Those same characteristics, not incidentally, are powerful predictors for marital success or failure.

The authors, G.L. Forward, Alison Sansom-Livolsi, and Jordanna McGovern, stress the fact that a family is more than merely a group of individuals who live under the same roof. They cite numerous studies indicating that parents play a crucial role in a child’s personal and social development. In fact, a child’s relationship with his or her parents is the single most important factor in predicting that child’s long-term happiness, adjustment, development, educational attainment, and success. Beyond that general information, studies indicate that girls get better support from the family than do boys. Girls feel closer to their parents, perhaps because parents converse with and express emotion more readily with daughters than with sons. In general, mothers spend far more time with daughters than with sons. Likewise, fathers spend more time with sons than with their daughters. Yet, father-daughter and mother-son relationships tend to have greater impact on a child’s future intimate relationships than their relationship with the same-sex parent.

All of this information has greater significance today then ever before because family structures are changing more rapidly than at any previous time. The National Center for Health Statistics reported in 2006 that 48 percent of all marriages in the United States ended in divorce. Other studies indicate that cohabitation, delayed marriage, serial marriages, and numerous blended family structures are affecting relationships and expectations between family members. Studies conclude that after a divorce mothers are less affectionate and communicate less often with their children. Long term erosion of family relationships is common, with the father-child relationship being the most endangered relationship following family turmoil.

The survey, given to students at two private, church-related universities in Southern California, asked students to evaluate their family’s relationship satisfaction, religiosity, and communication behaviors with the opposite-sex parent. Specifically, the study looked at the openness, assurance, dependency, and religiosity between the student and his or her mother or father.

Dependency — The authors define dependency as the attachment and emotional bonding that provides security that continues throughout a child’s lifetime. Healthy dependence is essential for autonomy. Ironically, parent-child dependency provides the foundation that enables the child to separate from the parents as he or she matures and becomes an adult. Social and emotional growth stems from a secure attachment — having a safe haven with parents enables a child to move away from their secure base to explore autonomy and independence as an adolescent and emerging adult. In other words, the more secure the base, the easier it is for a child to leave the nest; they know that the parents are there and feel secure enough to transition into a confident adulthood.

Openness — When parents and children openly and comfortably share their thoughts and emotions, the transition into healthy adulthood is easier. Further, such openness assists the child in decision-making. Greater interaction leads to fewer family problems. Parents who express love, offer frequent praise, and encourage give-and-take produce adolescents who are less likely to engage in dangerous behaviors when alone or with friends.

Assurance — A child’s self-esteem is strongly linked to parental assurance of worth. A vote of confidence from parents is particularly significant to adolescents. In fact, the ability to communicate assurance to a child is identified as a key to parental success. Successful parents give a child a sense of worth and lovability; coercive parents imply untrustworthiness and incompetence. These communication patterns especially affect girls; a father’s open encouragement and supportive attitude makes a daughter feel confident and creates a greater sense of personal worth.

Religiosity — The authors cited numerous studies that link religious beliefs and practices to a strong family unit and noted the fact that the most noticeable impact of religiosity is during adolescence. The majority of studies found an inverse relationship between religiosity and high-risk adolescent behaviors (drinking, drug use, sexual activity, depression, etc.). Other studies indicate a strong relationship between the family’s religious belief and practice and a teen’s emotional health and family well-being. This is especially true of teenage boys.

While family communication and interaction is critical to high-quality relationships for children and adolescents, this study suggests that the opposite-sex parent is especially important in making children feel validated and encouraged. This is true of boys as well as girls, but it is especially true of daughters. Fathers have the greatest impact on their daughters’ vitality as an adolescent college student. Daughters with a strong relationship with their father are more self-confident, self-reliant, and are more successful in school and career than those who have distant or absent fathers. Finally, the study validates the old adage, “The family that prays together, stays together” — even during those stressful adolescent and teen years.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Janice Shaw Crouse is a former speechwriter for George H. W. Bush and now political commentator for the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Janice Shaw Crouse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Nonsense on stilts
First of all, a survey of "students at two private, church related universities" is hardly a representative sample. A cross section of teenagers in general would be the first sign that this was genuine research and not propaganda.

I doubt Crouse would be eager to tell John McCain, Ronald Reagan, and Rudy Giuliani about how much they screwed up their families. Maybe she should give the same sympathy and benefit of the doubt to those couples who aren't GOP heavy hitters.

Two parents are best

The fact is two parents of differing sexes are best. Each parent has something different to offer the developing mind.

However, best is not always ideal given the circumstances.

With the shortages of two parent households willing to adopt or to act as foster parents we may be forced to consider single parent or same sex parents for prespective adoptive parents.

Off course a large question is why are there so many children in need of adoption in the first place? The answer is because Liberal programs are slowly, year and year, tearing up the fabric of our society causing more and more social and behavior problems.

Jefferson Constitutionalist
You need to be more specific. What liberal programs led to a greater need for adoptions, and how did they cause it? Here's a rundown of liberal policies that don't seem like likely candidates:

- Proponents of legal abortion
- Proponents of greater access to contraception
- Proponents of unmarried people being able to adopt
- Proponents of gay people being able to adopt

You don't add much to the discussion if you merely point fingers without explanation. However, I will admit it's fun. My turn: Why is this season of Heroes so underwhelming? Conservative policies, of course!

Looks like junk science to me.

As a psychologist who has studied development for 25 years, I can say that I don't trust this "research" for one second.

First, it runs counter to virtually all of previous research done by psychologists (which is substantial).

Second, I've never even heard of the "Journal of Communication and Religion".

Third, a finding that is this "at odds" with so many other studies would have a fairly easy time getting published in a decent psychological journal (assuming it was methodologically sound).

Note too that the article's author (Crouse) never bothers to explain why girls need a dad and boys need a mom.

Looks like more propaganda to me.



"Dr" Douglas
Looks like you need a little more learning time in reading.

Any psychologist would know the article agrees with any other study done on family relations.

What's substantial is your propaganda..for gouging people while offering NO benefit.

Duh
Only idiots (ref: Douglas) would even need a study to prove the average child raised by the average mother and father family is better off than being raised by any other combination.

But of course shattered families tend to produce liberals, so the destruction of the family has always been a liberal priority. See Sowell’s “Vision of the Anointed” or Kupelian’s “The Marketing of Evil”.

Pennsylvania Yankee

Well, you really need to be a conservative or an independant to understand the hows and whys Liberal programs are tearing down society.

But a good short answer might be "Liberal programs reward bad social behavior, while punishing good social behavior." "If you reward bad behavior, we should not be suprised if we get more bad behavior."

Sorry, but I don't buy it completely
I raised both of my sons by myself and we have a fantastic relationship and I'm currently raising a daughter by myself and she's turning out great.
Yes in an ideal world two parent "family" homes are best but, it's the parents love, involvement, and disipline that rules the day.

With my boys we competed internationally in karate, hunted and fished and I homeschooled them...My daughter I'm doing mostly the same things (except karate for now).

Sorry it's about the quality of parenting not the amount of parents.

Strive for the Ideal!
My how fast the naysayers come out to dispute any contention that the traditions liberals have devoted their existence to disrupting and overthrowing produce better human results than the chaos and confusion that results from their own policies.

Its really a pity that any study should even be necessary since its obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together and a lick of common sense that the optimal circumstances for childrearing are within a household composed of a husband and wife, united in loving commitment, who are raising their own, biological children.

Additionally, in those sad circumstances when the optimal arrangement cannot be achieved, it should be obvious that the best possible arrangement is a household that most closely approximates the optimal.

Only someone whose ability to reason is totally subordinated to his political agenda could even dream of using the phrase "best is not always ideal" -- as if the problems created by destructive, liberal social policy justified further social destruction.

Children are the future. They deserve the best -- even if that best means that their parents have to *gasp* act like adults and subordinate their personal whims to the fulfillment of their RESPONSIBILITIES.

Icedog, I disagree
"they tend to produce liberals"

I have 3 staunchly conservative kids. It's the single parents who don't take on their responsibility of raising their kids w/o aide who produce liberals, the ones who "feel" like life wronged them who raise liberals. It's the ones who turn aside from Family,Country and faith who produce liberals.

Like I said it's quality not quantity.





Mother of 4 NC
I have more than 2 braincells,
Nobody who's read my posts here would dispute that I'm not conservative.
Circumstances forced me to raise my kids solo.
I did it without government aide, I stayed home full time because of my braincells and I have 2 successful sons (adults) one who's married and one who's working FT I've NEVER had to get them from a police station or pick them up from school for bad behavior or the like but I noticed a lot of their friends from 2 parent households spent a lot of time in the principals office and the police station.
Don't try to make people stay in a bad situtation because of the kids..for everyone I know who tried it it didn't work.

Family Values
As a pediatrician in a large suburban practice, I see all kinds of families-- Loving, married heterosexual couples, families where mom stays home, families where dad stays home,families where both parents work, divorced parents, single parents (and there are definitely more of these than ever before), families where the parents are living together but not married, grandparents acting as parents and yes, even gay parents.

One of the most rewarding and important parts of my job is observing and helping families develop over time. From the time they first bring in their vulnerable, helpless newborn I watch parents grow in confidence as their child grows and thrives. I'm not sure there's a secret to good parenting but Love is definitely the most important family value. Other things are important too (and believe me, I could go on and on but I have to get ready for work) but I've seen successful families emerge from all the categories I've mentioned.

The so-called "religious right" -- people who have worked so hard to prevent gay marriage and the rights of gay people to adopt children --need to adopt Christ's true "Christian Values". Values like forgiveness, refraining from judging others and most of all LOVE. Do they really think a child is better off in foster care or a third world orphanage than to be raised by two loving (albeit same sex) parents?

Jesus never said anything about gay marriage or homosexuality in general. He said a lot about divorce though--but since this is common and accepted in our society many have chosen to ignore these passages.

In case you're wondering, this post was written by a middle-aged heterosexual married woman who is the proud mom of three wonderful daughters.

So what
as a general premise the author is correct. That does not mean that every two parent family is better than a single parent family of a same-sex family. Lots of two traditional two parent families are quite disfunctional. Any one of the things that helps to make those families work is the safety value of divorce. People who just don't beong together have the option of getting out so those who stay are better suited to that arrangement and therefore are in a better position to effectively parent.

And then there is the question of what to do about this information. We know that Eating Fast Food is very bad for you, study after study proves that so should McDonalds be illegal? Should taking you children to McDonalds be a form of child abuse? I ask these questions because the premise of reporting these studies is to force some government action against the right to divorce or same sex marrage.

What I would like to see is a study that compares the heathy development of children living in an orphanage to children adopted by same sex couples. If the studies concluded as they surely would that children are better off being adopted to same sex couples that to staying in an orphanage would your wingnuts then agree to support same-sex adoption?

Conclusion: Just because something has been found in a study to be statiscally optimal does mean that all other options should be made illegal.

There are many
combinations of families due to extenuating circumstances. What I see is the "same" throughout successful parenting is "prayer." That is the common theme. When we are in touch with God on a daily and personal basis--He guides us and honors our requests for His help. Does He always answer our prayers the way we want? I guess not--we have a daughter who has had a chronic serious disease for 24 years now--but has that in any way destroyed our family? No. It has made us stronger and more willing to go out on a limb and say that praise and worship and the love of God is the bottom line. Along with following His commands--then true joy can be found amidst life's crosses.

Man and Women vs. Same Sex Marriage
I agree that just because a study shows that for children, a traditional man and women marriage is better in general than a same sex marriage is no reason to make same sex marriage or adoption illegal for gays. However, there is a natural order of life. Same sex couples cannot reproduce without help. Life would cease to be with only unions of same sex. If the U.S. doesn't produce two children per family the population will decline a quarter every thirty years. This makes one wonder. In Europe, especially Germandy and Italy the average family produces an average of only 1.3 children while the Muslims produce 4.5 children per family. And if the Muslims take over say goodby to same sex marriage. They behead gays. And if you don't believe that Muslims are a threat to out populate the world look to Europe.

ellen
Jesus also didn't say anything about pedophilia or rape, if one goes by your standard. However, Jesus did in fact address the issue of homosexuality because He is God, and God in the O.T. mentioned it as being an abomination. And since Paul got his teachings from Christ, when Paul condemns homosexual behavior in Romans that is what he learned from Christ.

Also, in His discussion on divorce Jesus did address homosexual marriage. He pointed to "in the beginning" when God made them male and female and that was marriage. Nothing else is marriage.

As for single parents being able to turn out good children, that is very true. However, it usually is best with both parents. Since one is not always able to maintain the best in raising children, they do what they can as single parents. However, we do not make the lack of a male/female household the justification for a male/male or female/female parental unit. That is an abomination and harmful in so many ways to the child who is being used merely as a selfish tool of the gay couples.

What really counts
Although I'm an evangelical conversative, I know that upbringing in a household with both a mom and dad doesn't mean a thing. As JMO51 says, lots of two traditional two parent (even Christian) families are quite disfunctional.

Only in my 40s did I begin to fully recover from my upbringing in a "Christian" household with a mother and father.

Every one of us has a soul that is damaged and crippled as a result of sin and evil in this world, that is passed from generation to generation.

The Lord can take any situation and work it for his good. I would rather see a child in a single parent household, if that parent is a true servant of Jesus Christ, than have the child in a two-parent household with parents who are non-believers or are only professing Christians.

The Question Not Dealt With
There's no question that having two parents is essential to children. However, what is not discussed is what happens, or historically happened, when children had two parents, but they were not happy in the marraige and were not compatible. Just as being raised by one parent does not provide the necessary role models, being raised by two parents who are not compatible also does not provide the necessary tole models.

Marraige, or staying together, is not a magic formula for successful parenting. Too often, we tend to see one side of the equation, but not the other. Marraige is often idealized, while it's down side is ignored.

In general, children fare better when marraige is emphasized. However, a failed marraige is still a failed marraige. What society has never done is deal with the basics.

We make it easier for people to get a marraige license, than we do a driver's license. We have no age limits on marraige or on having a child, yet we won't allow someone to drink until they are 21 in most cases, or drive until they are 16. We allow children to become parents because we do not want to pass laws that remove the child subsequent to birth from the natural parent - even if that parent does not have the emotional or financial means to support the child. And lacking such laws, we don't enforce responsibility.

These are basics. We offer carrots, but not sticks. The most at risk children in this country are those born to individuals who lack the financial and emotional means to support them. We may not be able to solve the issue of two people being incompatible and separating, but we could certainly deal with the most at risk group.

But, of course, we won't.

Critical thinking is still important.
Sad that folks can't distinguish between indivual cases and life in general. Just because their exist two-parent households where children are raised horribly and households where a single parent does a wonderful job of raising children, one cannot then logically conclude that this means two parent households do not matter.

The personal outcome of these families does not translate into an invalidation of the common-sense reality that two parent households are more conducive to raising good citizens. Just as the fact that some indivuals escape a childhood of terrible abuse, criminality, and poverty to become upstanding citizens does not negate the fact that most do not.

It's OBVIOUS!
I cannot believe this is a topic worthy of debate. Saying that a married man and woman raising a family is the ideal is like saying a car runs better when all four wheels are actually on the car!

Anecdotes tell us very little. Observing life over many years and having common sense tells us what we need to know about child raising.

As Dennis Prager says, studies simply confirm what we already know about life, or they are wrong.


Around, Around the Mulberry bush...
till we all fall down.... Why does the reality of family relationships seem like a childs game to some people? They want to ignore the issue because they are living contrary to the ways that God ordained it to be. Most of us want to justify our own behaviour without really looking at the consequenses. Janice Crouse's article is spot on and should be the standard for ALL families. Wether or not you meet that standard is up to you, but don't expect something great from a sub-standard relationship.

Parents Have Obligations
"There's no question that having two parents is essential to children. However, what is not discussed is what happens, or historically happened, when children had two parents, but they were not happy in the marraige and were not compatible."

I chose to be a father. Guess what - when people choose to become parents, they have obligations. One of my obligations is treat my child's mother (my wife) with kindness and love. I should do that even when I don't FEEL like it. If they aren't happy in their marriage, they should MODEL a happy marriage (pretend) for their children.

I also chose to marry my wife. She makes it easy for me to show my child a happy marriage. There were some women I could have married where it wouldn't have been that easy. THAT IS ONE REASON I DIDN'T MARRY THEM. I know, it is a strange concept, only marrying someone with whom you are compatible. But it does make life easier.

Don't marry someone with whom you are not compatible.
Don't make babies with someone with whom you are not compatible and to whom you are not married.
Love your spouse and kids. If you don't feel like it, DO IT ANYWAY.

Happy New Year
Great article. You will never convince the gay parade with any logic, common sense, or statistics. Their mission is simple. My way or no way. Free love for everyone. Marriage for everyone. Marry anyone, or anything. Man woman, husband and wife does not matter in their eyes. Hell, why can't someone marry their brother, sister,cousin,sister-in-law,brother-in-law? See how crazy this can get? Let's get real.

If we really cared about the children?
Everyone knows why people are poor. It has to do with life choices.

I wonder how many babies would be born into poverty if welfare was moved up to 25 years of age and married to the father with five year limit, along with education and work requirements. Adjusted temporarily to bad economic times of course.

If the parents can’t handle the responsibility of children I would suggest private boarding schools for the purpose of moving these children into the private sector or the military instead of the sweat shops (streets). England created private boarding schools for this purpose many years ago.

England also moved the prostitutes and criminals to other parts of the world where there wasn’t a horrible class system and the people excelled. U.S., Canada, Australia and other parts.

We need to build an economic wall to protect our homes and jobs from the standing army, federal camp followers, agents and agencies. Our government is screwing things up on purpose to keep sucking the money off the people.

Higher taxes on labor and property taxes are killing the American dream we will be living in a Soviet night mare if our leaders have anything to do with it.

Dr. Douglas
"As a psychologist who has studied development for 25 years, I can say that I don't trust this "research" for one second. First, it runs counter to virtually all of previous research done by psychologists (which is substantial). ... Note too that the article's author (Crouse) never bothers to explain why girls need a dad and boys need a mom."

Frankly, my honest opinion is that if all previous research denies that the best environment for children is provided by two parents in a stable, committed, monogamous and heterosexual relationship, then all previous research has zero credibility.

"There needs no ghost, my lord, come from the grave / To tell us this."
--- Horatio, in Hamlet 1:V

Many Parents refuse to parent

Many parents refuse to actually parent their children. Some prefer to be "best friends" and not parent at all.

Many parents are afraid to parent because they fear their child might go to school and tell the teacher they were disciplined and next thing you know a social worker is showing up at your door threatening court action. Attn General Janet Reno actually had a childrens section on her website that encouraged kids to report to school authorities any racial or ethnic slurs they may hear in the house. Talk about Big Brother spying.

We now see many Liberals entering into marriage with the belief that if things don'w work out, they will just walk away from the marriage. No real committment. Just something to do because their friends are getting married. Many of these children end up in the foster care program.

Some people parent badly because they were parented badly when they grew up. The Cycle repeats.

Liberal programs only make these conditions worse.

these people
These people distort social science research.

Social science isn't behind their beliefs-- fanatical religion is.

There are many children in single parent homes or being raised by gay parents that are well adjusted kids.


Tom
We should ecourage every couple to have more children. We should encourage lesbian couples to each try artificial insemination. This is the only way to save western civiliation.

Family Upheaval and Grandparent Agony
What about the Grandparents who must watch the mistakes being made in raising their grandchildren? My daughter in law died of a terrible disease when her sons were 9 and 12. My son found someone a month later on the internet and she became the focus of his life, often leaving the boys alone, so as to do activities on the week end with her.

My son does not see what he has done to his sons and continues to disregard warnings that things are not going as well with his sons as he wants to think they are. He sees his providing housing, food, clothes, transportation and current electronic "toys" as fulfilling his duties to his sons. So, they sit in their rooms and play electronic games and that is just fine with him! He and his new lady are extremely happy together but are oblivious to the continuing unhappiness of the children who seem to feel that Dad has become lost to them, too.

I feel like a part of my son died when his wife died.

My son and his lady friend still go out, sometimes at night, and leave the boys alone preferring to think that they are little adults who can take care of themselves! I am so afraid that something bad will happen to them worse than what has already happened. I live too far away to physically intervene. Saying anymore about my concerns has become useless. Deaf ears!!

So, it is not just having 2 people or parents in a household but maybe about having at least one person who is committed to giving children the guidance, love, support and the gift of time that seems to be the issue here. I still believe in the traditional family unit but give Kudos to Edna Eagle for being there for her children and doing the right thing. God has blessed her for having the right spirit toward raising her children.



Wonderful Article, but....
The far left liberals including Obama who has already allowed millions of dollars from the bail out to go to the gay militant movement who supports him and appointed at least 7 to positions of power goes hand in hand with his decision to eliminate millions of American babies since he voted three times for infanticide and Planned Parenthoos has their hand out for millions more of the bail out money to keep their for-profit baby killing aka abortion factories moving forward; thus there won't be as many Americans born to heterosexuals and those who are taken away through the courts or given up for adoption will be adopted by same sex couples, so in the end, kids will be so messed up about marriage, sexual identity, and abortions, that the pharmaceutical companies will never run out of business as they create more Rx drugs for the new ailing population who will be having genetic and biological warfare in their heads.

Michael
So if research disagrees with your agenda then it isn't true? Common sense and the study of families throughout history prove that the ideal situation for children to grow up in is a mom/dad two-parent home (with a normal, loving relationship). Anything less than that is less than ideal. Not that it can't work, just that it isn't ideal.

I challenge all claims that say children of gay parents are well adjusted. They don't have any idea of true human sexuality. All they have is a distorted view with only perverted sexuality as their norm. This is not "well adjusted." They will grow up with a skewed view leading to their own dysfunction.

Rose
Very well said! Outstanding!

Dr. Dumbhead

Dr Douglas Location: OR
Reply # 27
Date: Jan 5, 2009 - 3:46 AM EST
Subject: Looks like junk science to me.

As a psychologist who has studied development for 25 years, I can say that I don't trust this "research" for one second.

=========

How about this research, Dr. D? I mean Dr. Dumbhead.

I remember the story where children were put in a room with a big cardboard box filled with toys.

When the parents returned a few minutes later, the girl was hugging a doll, and the boy was in the box, making motor noises as he “drove” on the freeway.

What would be the result if those children had only one parent?

=========

Hey, 50 years ago when I worked at the RAND Corp., I was in a car pool with four PhD psychologists. They told me I violated everything they had been taught in school.

My only comment at that time, and now, is "WOW, thanks."

Hogwash
Who paid for this study? " The Journal of Communication and Religion?" What did you expect the study to say?

Having rasied four terrific children, and now hoving over and spoiling eight fabulous grandchildren and two great grandchildren, I strongly feel that children flourish when they are raised by loving, involved parent(s) -- regardless of the gender, sexual orientation or marital status of the parent(s).

Anyone who makes any other claims is simply lying to further a political agenga.

It's in the breeding
Just look at people: we have thin,fat,short,tall,bald,hairy,smart,dumb,nice looking,ugly,nice,mean,dark hair,light hair,etc.

Now, if a farmer had a breeding system that put out hogs with all variances that i've mentioned, he couldn't get ten cents a pound for porkchops.

And if we were cars, many of us would be called "lemons".

Barbra in AZ
Thank you for your kind words.

I honestly believe that your son will pull his head out of his *** once the novelity of his new female friend wears off. He's lonely and she right now fills an empty space in his heart. I went thru that but I decided not to date till the kids were grown more.

Get those kids involved in something they can call their own and when your son sees what he's missing out on he'll come around I hope for the kids sake but if not they have the pride and bragging rights of doing something they love.
With my boys it was karate yes, I took a beating (sometimes) but we did it together and it gave them an out for their frustrations on a physical level and taught them self-disipline and respect ( but I had quite a few bruises in the process)
Getting the frustrations out before they become a thing to dwell on is really really important for kids.
Bless you and thanks again
Edna

Junk "Science"
It would be nice if people could do better than making fun of my name or attacking psychology (science) in general or even liberalism?

Crouse's claim is that children NEED parents of the opposite sex. See the title. This is not remotely true - virtually all decent psychological studies suggest otherwise (and there have been many). It's almost common sense, because there are many, many instances (obviously) when children with a single same-sex parent do just fine. It simply dishonest to say that they NEED an opposite sex parent.

These types of studies are scientific studies, with virtually all of them done by developmental psychologists. This is supposed to be a scientific article, but it's published in something called the Journal of Communication and Religion. Neither Communication or Religion are scientific fields. Can't you see that something fishy is going on (as in religious propaganda). No respectable scientific journal would publish this research.

Wonderful!!
I love reading each of these posts.They all make u laugh of how much BULL is out there.No matter how many times I read this stuff,I havent seen one where people can just say nice things,NOT one. This is normal though considering of where its coming from.If anyone would really think on that it would be easier to know what we all can do,but we r NOT,only that we have to bad mouth each other,including the one who wrote this.I feel for u Barbara,too bad it went that way.I have grown kids too.

opinion?
Nonsens on stilts? probably just wanted to see their reaction??Our children r going thru a very stressful life.What all of us parents r puting them thru is alot to handle.Its not like it used to be ,yes ma-yes pa. Now theyed rather be with friends. Most of us r now enjoying "other"stuff.I know several families feel better when their just "smokin".They feel it helps their issues.We cant harm them anymore-they can say what they like & we have to take it.Cant blame them as many of us r to blame .We have one grat leader if anyone would look it up to see who it is,ud all find out WHY the world is the way it is,til a certain time & then no more.

To Barbara in AZ
Your situation with your son is similar to what our family went through when my brother's first wife died at age 27. My brother also had a 'new woman' in his life within a month of his wife's death and would not heed the family's concerns about how quickly he'd gotten seriously involved after suffering such a major loss. In hindsight I realize that some people can't handle the grief and pain brought on by the death of a loved one and instead try to re-create happier times. Your son will eventually come back down to earth (my brother did). In the meantime, try to take advanatage of your grandsons' electronic gadgets to keep in touch with them and let them know YOU care what happens to them; maybe you'd consider sending them the gift of a webcam so you can have regular, real-time video visits with them while dad works through his 'issues'.
Will keep your son and his boys in my prayers that things turn around for them.

"Junk 'Science'"
"Neither Communication or Religion are scientific fields." News flash, Dr. Douglas, neither is Psychology!

The author is arguing for a value judgment regarding the worth of opposite-sex parents and intact families for the healthy social and moral development of children. The evidence for the author's conclusion of a "need" is based on thousands of years of development of the family unit and current anecdotal evidence, aka "common sense".

TH takes digs
Only those parents who are unselfish, committed and loving make the best parents. PERIOD.
Taking digs at gay or single parents is beside the point.

Ideal, fine. But none of those who support gay and single parents have anything AGAINST the traditional ideal.
Support for one thing doesn't mean NON support of the other.

We're just realistic about need and support where there are gaps to fill.

Mother of 4, you are casting stones from, in part, a fortunate place.
You haven't been abandoned or widowed, regardless of what ideal you aspire to.
And those who are gay parents, especially through adoption, obviously and competently are taking on someone else's responsibility and doing so with love and care.
Such adoptions are after careful investigation.
If ONLY heteros were required to have such licensing. Maybe THEN, there wouldn't be so many children without 'ideal' parents.

Heterosexuality, nor opposition in gender is a guarantee of ANYTHING.
Not of morals, character or the ability to raise a houseplant.

Pediatrics mag has published a research paper this month on the physical and emotional dangers gay children face when abandoned or not accepted by their parents.
Who are by a large majority, heterosexual.

It's comprehensive and realistic guidelines concerning safe sex, and realistic knowledge regarding gender, gender variance and sexual orientation that would save millions a lot of heartache and unnecessary fear.

Since when is it better to avoid being fully educated?
Fear, ignorance and need...are what lead to worse problems.

A response to Dr Douglas
"Neither Communication or Religion are scientific fields."

This is at best a misstatement. First, Religion may not be a SCIENCE, but it is a field of SCHOLARSHIP. As such, there are numerous scholarly journals that deal with it, as I'm sure you know.

More important, Communication is also a scholarly discipline, which is considered part of both the social SCIENCES and the humanities. As a doctor, you ought to have noticed a Communication department in your university; virtually all doctoral-level institutions have one.

Further, your statement that "No respectable scientific journal would publish this research" and characterizing it as "propaganda" is also incorrect. The cited Journal is peer-reviewed, just as psychological journals are. I've included a link with more info:

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/rca/rcajournals.html

However, your broader point about casting a wary eye on academic research has some validity. After all, it was your own American Psychological Association that gave the world "A Met@-analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples."

(Pardon the misspelling, but for some reason M-E-T-A is an "unacceptable word" on TH.)

Although
I come from an intact family -- I will tell you that as my peers and I our children of Baby Boomers the majority of my friends do not. And parents may not want to believe this but I have many friends in their thirties that still suffer from their parents' divorces. We really need to do away with no-fault divorce at least for couples with children.

Marriage befoer no fault divorce was treated as other contracts and kids were better for it. Honestly, if you have children you have no right to disrupt their lives because you are bored, or unfulfilled, or fell out of love.

Interesting But .....
Kids need BOTH sexes as parents to grow up balanced. Boys need to know where women come from as well as what fathers can teach. Girls need fathers to help as much as they need mothers. The primary thing they need is to see and learn that love exists and should be a basis for marriage and family life instead of frequent sex with multiple partners and an expectation that the government will pay to raise your children instead of you doing it yourself.

Something else that I've noticed
We have now created two generations X and the ones who came after them filled with young women who evidence low self-esteem through promiscuity and boys who never learned to be men. IMO although the culture as a whole had a role in this it was primarily caused by children being raised in large number by single parents. Children need the attention of both male and female parents. And although there are circumstances where this is not possible, we as a culture have gone out of our way to excuse irresponsible behavior on the part of parents.

Maybe if we are going to have no-fault divorce the party who files for divorce should automatically give up any right to child custody, financial support, the family home, etc.

We have a phenomenon in this country where the majority of divorce filers are women, without a legitimate reason. These same women then get primary custody, the family home, and child support. We should also bring morals back into deciding child custody. If mom or dad is having sex partners spend the night they automatically lose custody.

curious paper
I tried to find the paper to see more of what it actually shows, but without success.

The decision to focus on two religious affiliated schools seems an odd one.

A possible explanation is that this appears to be a graduate student project by two students at a religious college. Presumably they interviewed their fellow students as part of the study.

The third co-author is their advisor who happens to be on the executive committee of the group that is publishing the article.

Obviously this is not a serious article comparing say regular marriage and same-sex marriage since their are unlikely to be a significant number of children of the latter in the survey. Rather we seem to have a data point about child rearing in the evangelical community. It would be interesting to see how things would differ if the survery covered other communities.

Good news to share widely
While a certain point of view is that such findings are to be expected, sadly too many readers are likely to be surprised by these findings.

I encourage people to share this with others, both those who may not already understand these important parenting points, and for those who do. I mention the latter as we all sometimes need reminders of the importance of the relationships we have with our children.

Thanks to Beth and Edna!
Your comments were very helpful and extremely kind! Thank you so very much.

Where are our priorities?
Having been raised in a two parent 'Christian' home with a very abusive father (physical and emotional) and an unprotective, sometimes self-absorbed mother, I would agree with Redlac from AZ on several subjects. As the oldest daughter of seven, I know well the 'damage' sustained by me and my siblings, now adults.

A real 'eye opener' was in nursing school during a course in Human Development. My parents (especially Dad) had no clue about normal child development and in particular the emotional needs of a child. He was abused as a child, probably mentally ill and had some form of NPD-narcissistic personality disorder (in my opinion).

I believe there should be a Marriage Course required AND passed before a couple applies for a marraige license. Psychological testing and parenting classes should be included.
My children took a driving course, passed a written test (after many tries) and driving test in order get a driver's license.
Isn't the welfare of children and the stability of marraige and the family unit more important than being permitted to legally drive a motor vehicle?

In my work as a nurse doing home visits on families with newborns, I see couples (of all types), and especially first time parents who would greatly benefit from taking parenting classes!

Dysfunctional families should be the exception, not the norm.


As an example
To make clear the limitations of this study, consider the finding about the importance of religiosity. This is a survey of students who have chosen to go to a religious affiliated school. (By this I don't think they mean a school like Notre dame that mixes the religious and the secular).

So what the survey says is that religious people tend to either have grown up happy with strong religious upbringing or unhappy with not receiving a strong religious upbringing. But that is kind of what one would expect from young religious adults. One suspects that if one did a survery of atheists one would find either a negative reaction to a religious upbringing or a positive reaction to a secular one.

Barbara from AZ

Barbara, Thanks for sharing your concerns. Many of us understand. I agree that sooner or later you son will wake up and smell the roses.

In the meantime, do a google search on a youth organization called DeMolay. There are 8 chapters in Arizona. The organization is dedicated to building good character in young men between the ages of 12 and 21.

Don't wait too long. The sooner young men join the better.

Barbra in AZ
HSLDA has a group with an AZ chapter it's called Generation Joshua it's a great christian group which concentrates on history and civics I know it's not something that most kids would think of exploring but they're great people and it would be new and different and a distraction and it would benefit the kids to be around something other than video games they can really be addictive and cause the boys to become withdrawn
G'luck
Edna

Both matter
My mother divorced when I was very young, and raised me herself for seven years. She was a wonderful mother, and I'm sure I would have "turned out well" had she raised me herself for my entire childhood. But my whole world changed when she married the wonderful man I now call Dad. I have benefited vastly from having a parent from both sexes, and yes, I think any child who is raised by only one parent is deprived.

Orphanages are not a bad thing.

This whole idea that orphanages are a bad thing is puzzling to me.

My father was raised in an orphange from the age of 6 and he turned out to be a pretty good father to me and my siblings. Was he perfect? No. But he was always there when we needed him and still is for his grandchildren.

He tells stories about life growing up at the orphanage and how things were strick, orderly, stable and how everyone had a job or a task to perform and you better do it or you lost priviledges. There were both girls and boys at his particular orphanage. Older boys would bully the younger boys but at the same time look out for them and teach them their responsibilties. Kinda like a "Big Brother".
They celebrated holidays as a group. Played games in the yard after school and chores we complete and never felt unwanted by the staff.

Contrast that to a six year old today up for adoption. He may feel nobody wants him. That he is the only one suffering. That nobody understands what he/she is going through. In an orphanage, they meet others in the same or similar circumstances. Kids they can relate to, Kids that have expericenced similar homelives.

I submit a well managed orphanage might be a better enviorment then some of the other options out there.

Biologic orphans suffer
The optimal situation with the best (not guaranteed) chance of raising a child to be happy and successful is being raised by his biologic parents.

All other situations are compensatory. They do not have equally good outcomes if you take a hundred of each kind of child rearing and compare, though individuals may buck the odds.

Some people, especially liberals cannot separate their personal experience from what is best for others. They are so insecure that they must believe that the situation in life that produced them is good for everybody.

Conservatives can by and large separate the personal from the political. They realize that just because their single parent managed to bring them up decently, this is not the role model society should be encouraging. Libs insist on it though.

For the sentimental, I'm sorry, "love" is not always enough to compensate for family situations that may still cost the child. Many adopted adults now joined by people conceived with AI (Artificial Insemination) have holes in their hearts where their knowledge of their biologic parents should be no matter how desperate their adoptive parents were to have them.
Of course, if children are orphaned by accident, adoptive parents are a blessing. However, there is a difference when you set out to purposely create, and when the state subsidizes the purposeful creating of at least a half biologic orphan i.e. when a child lives with one or two non-biologic parents while his biologic parents are out there somewhere unknown.

Adults are repairing their sadnesses (being born sterile, gay etc.) at the expense of children. Of course they want to believe that their selfishness has not hurt the child, but they have no proof of this in well done long term studies.

This Article Is Right on Target...
and would have been a common sense assumption just a few decades ago. It didn't take a Ph.D or numerous studies(many with agendas and pre-concieved conclusions)to understand what was discerned through an informed conscience and reason, two components that are severely lacking in this "new age".

Anecdotal experience:
As one who has spent over 30 years in law enforcement, divided between Corrections and working the streets as a police officer, I have had the opportunity to speak with many young law breakers. Both in Prison, on the streets, as well as processing them for arrest.

The common denominator linking the vast majority of offenders is their lack of a supportive family environment.

With few exceptions they come from homes with absentee fathers. Mothers that are either overwhelmed with responsibilty with lttle time for them, or there are substance abuse issues.

AS I was growing up in a large city in the 60s, it was almost unheard of that there were not two parents in the home. Did some of us get in trouble? Sure. But by comparison they were minor offenses which seeemd to be a part of those adolescent growing pains.

We knew that we were in trouble when we got home and never would we show disrespect to an elder. Those values were instilled from an early age both at home and in school. A culture that lionizes annarchy, drug use and "gangstas" is not conducive to the formation of a well rounded adult.


We all know that...........
two opposite sex parents create the ideal environment for children. We also know that dysfunctional family environments, whether same sex or opposite sex beget neurotic children, unless they are strong of character. Even if the LGBT factions within the legal community are successful at muzzling their conservative cohorts, as they have been since the implementation of speech codes with the code of ethical conduct, it is extremely unlikely that the normalization of neurotic behavior and its associated paraphilias will be successful with the advent of MRI polygraphs which would allow for genuine self-reporting among the LGBT professional community. We'll wait and see what the homofascists in the legal community do. I'm inclined to believe that we'll see the rise of the national socialists if the conservative populace does not directly challenge the fraud emanating from the liberal bodies of the APA(s) ands the ABA.

DHulme
No, we DON'T all know that. You are working from a complex set of assumptions that didn't make COMPARATIVE research as available and for as long.
Again, heterosexuality and opposite gender of parents is no guarantee of any such ideal whatsoever.
Compared to who?
Compared to what?

How about the research on families with large broods. The effect of sibling rivalry for parental attention?

How about the children of parents who have chronic or debilitating illness?
Or genetic deafness, blindness or other issues? Like Huntington's or sickle cell?

When enough comparisons are made say, with GOOD parents...who have been essentially successful the factor isn't their gender so much as attentivness. Even to whatever void is there.
Same gender couples don't raise their children in vacuums. They have opposite sex family and friends that balance out that factor.

Same goes for families that adopt children or have them of difference color or ethnicity. They balance it out by mixing that factor into their lives on a regular basis.

Assumptions based on faulty ideology has made for some horrendous social maladjustment.

Your digs at gay people won't hide the fact that our society has constantly confounded gay people with the best of intentions and skills for THEIR lives and families.
As well as the contributions that can be made towards children and society in general.

Gay people have every right to challenge interference in doing what, if they were not gay...would be considered noble, generous and unselfish.
It doesn't make it any less so because it's a gay person who wants to do it.

You might want to come up with a better reason than assumptions.
Results...for example, that justify them that differ from the results of when heterosexuals do the same.

Mom and Dad Ideal
Although many things can happen in life to upset a family, no one can dispute that little girls need a father and little boy need a mother for they get something valuable and necessary from both. I know gay people and people who cannot have children want them, I just think it is sad when they by medical means are creating fatherless and motherless children. I grew up in a home with a less than involved father. He may as well have not been there at all and I will tell you I have missed that relationship my whole life. So when you are single or in homosexual relationships please think of that. You may not think they need the other parent, but they deserve nothing less if and whenever possible. It is not to say that single people or gay people cannot be loving people but it is not the ideal situation in my opionion.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.