Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Jackie Gingrich Cushman :: Townhall.com Columnist
Immune to Reality
by Jackie Gingrich Cushman
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


President Obama, the Democratic leader, has stayed on target, continued along his path and acted consistently even-keeled and professional – sure of his positions and policies.  While often at odds with facts and reality – he is surely sure that his reality is real.

On the opposite side, the Republican Party has been distracted by media fashioned internal fighting, (Conservative Radio Host Rush Limbaugh, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, and former Speaker Newt Gingrich), made-for-TV soap-opera personal revelations, (Senator John Ensign of Nevada, Governor Mark Sanford of South Carolina), and Governor Sarah Palin’s fireworks-creating resignation announcement on July 3rd.

Possibly, leading the country isn’t as much about dealing in reality, as it is about having the conviction that how you represent your version of reality is what actually matters.

What’s at risk?  That the nation too will become immune to reality, and believe that more, bigger better government is the answer to all problems.  

“Passive immunity lasts only for a few weeks or months,” notes the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Web site, “only active immunity is long-lasting.”  Let’s hope that, in seeking to recover from the economic malaise that is infecting the nation, this administration’s current transfer of antibodies against reality is passive, not active and will soon be over.

In the meantime, we might want to ponder: Just as style is much more about how clothes are worn than it is about the clothes themselves,  – maybe we should realize that good governance is not only about policies, but also about how, and by whom the policies are communicated.

The GM line of cars of the 1960’s was expansive and represented the dreams of many Americans turning into reality.  Let’s hope that when reality dawns, that the GM car sitting in our nation’s carport today is not a lemon but sparkles in the sun, and performs on the road.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Jackie Cushman is a freelance writer who lives in Atlanta, Georgia. Her column also runs later in the week in the Northside Neighbor.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Just A Point of Clarification
It's possible for this reader of the article by Jackie Gringrich Cushman to be left with the impression that a 2 to1 change toward a more conservative tendency America has occurred during the Obama Presidency. But, the polling question was worded in a way that asked the subjects to compare their view with that of the past few years. So, the poll does not necessarily indicate a massive change to radical conservatism over the last few months; but possibly a comparative change over a period of years.
[http://www.gallup.com/poll/121403/Special-Report-Ideologically-Moving.aspx]
Those results not withstanding the election of Barack Obama.

It also does not take into account the 'qualitative' difference in the conservative change that may have occurred. For example, on a scale of 1 to 10, what is the degree of change? Some who answered in the affirmative that “their view had become more conservative in the past few years”, doesn't say that the change in point of view is great enough to make an ideological change—in other words, how many liberals and moderates actually made a shift that would make a difference ideologically. And the largest component of those who have become more conservative were conservatives in the first place; so this segment doesn't represent an ideological change at all, since they were conservative in the first place.

Upon examination of the Gallup report listed above, you will notice a reversal in the percentage of popularity of some traditionally conservative issues; and, on balance, a similar reversal has occurred on some liberal issues. These mixed outcomes only confirm the suggestion that this study does not represent an unequivocal trend toward conservatism—which Ms. Cushman's article may suggest to some.




Him An' Me
Says:

While I admire and agree with the logic and conclusions of the article, I suggest we look closely at two words which have become interchangeable. Principles and values are not synonymous. Principles are fundamental specific truths or laws. They do not fluctuate repeatedly. Values do fluctuate (often rapidly) as needs and/or desires evolve. Values are relative. It is my sense that Governor Sarah Palin’s positions are rooted firmly in principles, whereas President Barack H. Obama’s positions are based on the relativity of changing values. Have we forgotten Values Clarification? I hope not."
____________________________
EXCELLENT POST! I wish more people understood the very important distinction you are making here.

The consultants and pundits refer to the 'values voters' which is another of those amorphous political phrases such as 'community values' - meant to conjure up visions, get some political traction but actually mean nothing.

Obotman can talk of 'values' but, from his policies and acts, he actually stands for some pretty ugly things: economic destruction and control, degrading the nation internationally, divide and control domestically based on race/class warfare politics, extension of his power through lies and intimidation, etc.

This is what he 'values' and are his values, none of which is based on principle.

Hitler was a man who had 'values'. He valued the political expediency obtained from race based politics - and he also valued exterminating his racial ('inferior') enemies.

Hitler wasn't burdened much with 'principle' either.

So much for 'values voters'.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.