Ed Feulner
Swerving Off the Path to Prosperity

SHARE THIS:
Share

When future historians characterize this era, chances are they won’t label it as America’s “golden age.” Indeed, they may well mark 2010 as the year the United States became the home of the “mostly free.”

That’s the finding of the latest “Index of Economic Freedom,” an annual compendium published by The Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal.

The U.S. earned an overall score of 78 out of a possible 100 points in the Index. That was good enough for eighth place, globally. But that score was down 2.7 points from last year’s. It’s the biggest drop recorded among the world’s 20 largest economies. The decline was comparable to Venezuela’s (down 2.8) and Yemen’s (down 2.5), two poster children for bad economic behavior.

The American economy moved from the rarified air of the “free” to the more crowded (and less economically successful) realm of the “mostly free.” That could haunt Americans for years to come.

Arguing with Idiots By Glenn Beck

That’s because, as the Index editors note, less economic freedom means less economic prosperity. And that hurts everyone’s bottom line.

The reason for the drop is obvious: In the face of a global recession, American policymakers intervened repeatedly in the economy. Uncle Sam bailed out banks, insurance companies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The government bought up two major automakers, then announced a program (Cash for Clunkers) that aimed (unsuccessfully) to create demand for new cars.

Our government pumped out hundreds of billions in new federal spending, but failed to prop up the economy. “The early evidence is that such spending did not work,” the Index editors write. Our nation’s 10 percent unemployment rate backs them up.

Throughout its 16 editions, the Index has repeatedly shown that economic freedom isn’t a dogmatic ideology. It actually represents the rejection of dogma and the embrace of diverse and even competing strategies for economic advancement.

Yet the U.S. is leading a trend, as we so often do. This time, though, the trend line is down. “The average economic freedom score for the 2010 Index is 59.4, down 0.1 point from 2009,” the editors write. “This is only the second time in the history of the Index that average scores for countries measured in successive years have declined.”

That could be a problem. After all, none of the other systems tried throughout human history have come close to economic freedom in terms of providing broad-based prosperity. Experience teaches that even the best efforts of central planners and bureaucrats do not lead to sustainable growth.

Ed Feulner's Biography
Dr. Edwin Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation, a Townhall.com Gold Partner, and co-author of Getting America Right: The True Conservative Values Our Nation Needs Today .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ed Feulner's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Join the Debate
13 Comments So Far
David Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 2:25 PM
Why not use simplicity? Get rid of all in the current administration, congress, "activists"
in the legal system and start over? It couldn't be worse with a new "bunch" and if they act poorly, start over again. Possibly punishment for
incompetence, acting inappropiately should be X years in prison with some hardened criminals as roommates.

In Illinois there is a suggestion floating about to make a governor elect spend four years in Prison before he/ she serves as governor...and if after they serve in public office they mess up...back into prison.

Could it be worse than what we have now?
Greatest country in the world and "They" are
messing it up! Time to mess with "Them".
Yipee ay aye, yipee ay oh.
Kirby Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 12:30 PM
It's not so much big business, altho thats a factor. But thats also a natural cycle-- those who do not adapt become inefficient and ultimately fail.

But the inefficient big business is propped up by govt., insurance & lawyers. The govt. regulates up and coming competitors away by forcing them to borrow too much to even start. Insurance rewards stupid decisions by big business & the govt. "intervenes" on whims & makes arbitrary decisions. Then the lawyers step in and drive "undercapitalized competitors out of business. That's the current model & that's why we're in deep kimshi.

How to solve?

1. How about we eliminate corporate income tax? Businesses won't object (or will they?) and the result is they'll save billions not just in taxes, but in lobbying efforts (no need to lobby, right?), and in accounting and tax planning. That'll either drop the cost of products to consumers and/or result in increased compensation to employees. Sounds like everyone would be happy.

2. The only govt. responsibility is to make sure businesses actually spend money on business, not on luxries to employees. ANy benefit given to any employee would be taxed as income. This includes stock options to CEOs, and health benefits to everyone. Thus the employer would stop paying for insurance, and the cost of that would plummet, while the diversity of the product would increase.

3. Any federal regulation of anything must comply with the original intent of the Constitution. Does the Const. say Congress can regulate education? Medicine? Agriculture? The stock market? Banking? Retirement? Poverty? Don't give me the lip about interstate commerce-- the intent of the founders was to eliminate tariffs between the states. We do this, our federal taxes will drop to about 3-4%, and it'll be up to the states to figure those other things out. Then, people can vote with their feet. Don't like CT, move to VA. Don't like TX, move to CA.
Greyhawk Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 10:29 AM
Great summation of the problem Egon. Back to basics in every sphere of our society.

Old Bill Carter had it right when he said: "Kill all the lawyers." We now have over 90 percent of our congress who are lawyers and also most of the lobbyists. And, then these Lawyers Write Bills in Legalese that Only Lawyers Understand, and make it so that you hve to have a lawyer to read a basic contract so that he can De Cipher the Legalese that was Put there with the Intention of being Incomprehensible to a non-lawyer.

Tort Reform would be a great place to start, but first we will have to Elect Non Lawyers to do it. They Defend their Own and They Are the Ones who Benefit from Frivolous and Baseless Lawsuits to begin with. That is why the Trial Lawyers Associations always vote Socialist. They know the Socialists Will Never vote for Tort Reform, and in fact, they know that the Socialists will Make even more Laws that Require Lawyers to De-Cipher. Many corporations have to spend tens of millions on lawyers annually just to Do the Paperwork Required By The Government to Prove they are Obeying the Endless Regulations, Rules, and Guidelines of the Bureaucracy and more tens of millions on Tax Attorneys To Satisfy the IRS Rules, Regulations and Policies. And, the band plays on. Billy Carter had it right. We should have voted for Billy instead of his Knucklehead Socialist Brother, Jimmy.
Egon Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 9:58 AM
I am 100% with you!

One crucial point everyone seems to forget is the de facto tyranny of our legal system.
Lawyers have preempted avery aspect of American life and business.
We moved our business (agriculture) to Brazil about 10 years ago due to mainly the high cost of complying with American bureaucracy and preventive "lawyering"...
Most people think we moved to Brazil (over 3,000 jobs) because of the cost of labor, that is NOT the case. Actually our labor cost is a bit higher in Brazil when compared to illegals in the US.
When in the US we had only two options : move offshore or go broke. Today we are highly competitive globally and we are selling to 27 markets around the world.
America needs first and foremost TORT REFORM accross the board (starting with loser pays) and then start eliminating 80% of our bloated bureaucracies. The Department of State would probably be where I would start, going on to EPA, OSHA, NEA, FDA, USDA, and all others.
Social Security and Medicare should slowly be phased out too.
RJBJr Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 9:57 AM
I agree there are big problems with government and taxation. But our problems are not confined to the Government.

Our larege businesses and industries have bureaucratic problems as well. The real problems are Complexity and Bigness. The old pyramid model of corporate and government structure, with power and wealth increasing as you move "up" is a flawed model. The bigger the pyramid, the less efficient, and more political, the organization becomes. Real creativity is inhibited (or virtually impossible).

We need big corporations to create wealth and to compete with off shore industries. So, we better start implementing more efficient structures than the old pyramid. We need a new business structure that gives more people citizens a chance to be rewarded for their creativity and productivity. There are better ways.
Ron Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 9:37 AM
We the people pay all taxes, and we are the only ultimate source of all tax revenue. Regardless where government initially collects it, all tax money ultimately comes from us, the people.
Since we the people are the one and only source of all tax revenue:
There should be only one tax to collect all tax revenue.
It should be a single, simple, fair, direct, graduated, individual, full-income tax levied on living persons for each level of government: One Tax and Done.
You cannot convince a person or corporation to start a new business or expand an existing business, increase jobs, and hire new employees, when you tax away the capitol he is using to operate his PRESENT business. Every dollar taken by government is a dollar not available to create jobs.
The best thing that government can do to help the country, the people, and even government, is to repeal all of the many hundreds, or thousands of existing taxes, fees, and charges. These taxes are the federal deficit. These taxes are the high price of everything. These tax eliminations are spending cuts. Every tax that is eliminated is a tax that we the people no longer have to pay. These taxes are the difference between the price we pay for health care and everything else, and the price we would pay if these taxes were repealed. Eliminating these taxes will remove them from the price paid for everything by everyone.
One Tax and Done will provide many benefits to all, even government:
One Tax and Done will reduce the price paid for everything by one-third.
Greyhawk Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 8:55 AM
There is no end to what the government wants to regulate and then tax us for the cost of regulating.

There is more lunatic legislation on the books today that it is no wonder that it costs so much to run this government.

We now have a government which is influenced and run by lunatics who want to regulate everything from French Fries to Nuclear Reactors.

The government does nothing very well, and yet we have politicians and bureaucrats who want to control all industries and personal freedoms of citizens while they cannot even figure out how to balance a budget. And, the reason that they can never balance a budget is that the cost of running the government is so expensive that they have to over tax individuals and businesses to fund the government itself and there is still not enough tax money to pay for it all, so they print bogus money and borrow money from our enemies to pay for a mostly worthless government that does nothing but expand in size, power and spending.

The U.S. government Tax System and Regulatory System has driven most of America's Manufacturers and Industries out of the country. They leave the country to escape Government Taxes and Regulations that make it impossible to compete and make a profit.

The aim of the Communists is to destroy the Private Sector, and our government Regulators and Taxers have done a pretty good job of doing just that.

When will Americans Wake Up and Tell This Government, No New Taxes, No New Regulations, No New Agenices, Departments or Commission, or Czars. And, then, when Will Americans say, "Down With Agencies, Departments, Commissions and Czars."

The Government is The Problem, Not The Solution.
In fact, the Government itself has Caused Most Of America's Problems, and now we Expect Them To Fix Them with More Government, More Regulations, etc. which always Equates to More Taxes as the Government Continues to Expand.
Greyhawk Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 8:41 AM
To turn this country around, we must Down Size the Power, Control, and Expenditures of the U.S. government.

Anytime that the government creates an agency, department or commission to deal with a "perceived" problem, whatever that perceived problem is, the "perceived problem" is guaranteed never to improve and in fact, it is guaranteed to worsen.

Every government agency, department or commission becomes it's own self-perpetuating empire, and in order for the Empire To Expand, it has to "Create New Victims" to serve, or "Create More Problems" to solve.

And, as the government agencies, departments and commissions grow in size, number of employees, buildings, expenditures, etc. they have to keep creating problems or indentifying new problems to "fix" or new victims to "serve."

In short, anytime the U.S. government intervenes into any situtation, the situation is guaranteed to worsen as the U.S. Government Bureaucratic Machine Gains New Growth, Power and Momentuam, and then the Legislature Makes More and More Restictive Laws, Rules, Regulations, etc. and of course, they have to come up with more and more Ways to Extract Taxes, Fees, Etc. to Fund the Bureaucratic Machine.

To take this country back, we must Roll Back the Size and Power of our U.S. Government as it Now has A Striking Resemblance to the old, now bankrupted USSR. And, there are many in our government now, and especially, President Barack Obama, who highly admires Soviet-Style Regimes, and is therefore, Expanding The Size, Power and Expenditures of the U.S. Government and is in fact, Creating New Agencies, Departments and Commissions, not to mention the scores of Czars who are independent Henchmen.

We must Stop Obama and this Congress, and then We have To Begin the Destruction and Abolishment of Many U.S. Government Agencies, Departments and Commissions and get back to the intent of the U.S. Constitution.
Greyhawk Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 8:39 AM
To turn this country around, we must Down Size the Power, Control, and Expenditures of the U.S. government.

Anytime that the government creates an agency, department or commission to deal with a "perceived" problem, whatever that perceived problem is, the "perceived problem" is guaranteed never to improve and in fact, it is guaranteed to worsen.

Every government agency, department or commission becomes it's own self-perpetuating empire, and in order for the Empire To Expand, it has to "Create New Victims" to serve, or "Create More Problems" to solve.

And, as the government agencies, departments and commissions grow in size, number of employees, buildings, expenditures, etc. they have to keep creating problems or indentifying new problems to "fix" or new victims to "serve."

In short, anytime the U.S. government intervenes into any situtation, the situation is guaranteed to worsen as the U.S. Government Bureaucratic Machine Gains New Growth, Power and Momentuam, and then the Legislature Makes More and More Restictive Laws, Rules, Regulations, etc. and of course, they have to come up with more and more Ways to Extract Taxes, Fees, Etc. to Fund the Bureaucratic Machine.

To take this country back, we must Roll Back the Size and Power of our U.S. Government as it Now has A Striking Resemblance to the old, now bankrupted USSR. And, there are many in our government now, and especially, President Barack Obama, who highly admires Soviet-Style Regimes, and is therefore, Expanding The Size, Power and Expenditures of the U.S. Government and is in fact, Creating New Agencies, Departments and Commissions, not to mention the scores of Czars who are independent Henchmen.

We must Stop Obama and this Congress, and then We have To Begin the Destruction and Abolishment of Many U.S. Government Agencies, Departments and Commissions and get back to the intent of the U.S. Constitution.
Greyhawk Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 8:28 AM
What has happened in the financial world is what happens when the U.S. Government insures Banks and Bankers. Bankers can take huge risks because they are in a win-win situation. When things go south, the Tax Payers Via the U.S. Government get to pick up the tab.

Fannie and Freddie and the Community Reinvestment Act (Homes for deadbeats legislation initiated by Jimmy Carter) lead to the Housing Bubble and Burst. All the Bags of Trash Loans To Deadbeats to buy homes kept getting pushed upstream to the Tax Payers and We, the Tax Payers Got Left Holding the Bags of Trash Loans.

This was no accident. The Lenders Were First Forced by Legislation to Loan Money To Deadbeats To Buy Homes, with the Promise from Government That They could Keep Handing Off the Bags of Trash Loans, reaping profits from each transfer, until the Bags of Trash Loans Wound Up At Freddie and Fannie Who Then Handed Them Off To The Taxpayers, and the Band Played On, until the Summer of 2008, when it was Decided by Government and Banks To Say, "Hey, We Have A Problem. If you do not bail us out, We Will Fail as Banks and Financial Institutions." Thus, the Bank Bailouts which left us Taxpayers Finally Holding All The Bags of Garbage Loans, and Obama to the Rescue. This entire Financial Meltdown was already Melted Down, but they Staged the Crash at a Time To Insure the Election of Obama, and the Hard Working Taxpayers Got Left Holding the Bag of Trash Loans given to Deadbeats which the Liberal Democrats and Corrupt Bankers were in Cahoots with the whole time.
Greyhawk Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 8:26 AM
Bernie Madoff is in prison for 150 years for pulling off a Ponzie Scheme that netted him billions. Well, the U.S. Government and their Allies in Freddie and Fannie and all the banks and mortgage companies operating within the Community Reinvestment Act guidelines pulled off a Much Larger Ponzie Scheme that Left the U.S. Taxpayers being the Losers of Trillions of Dollars.

Why should Madoff go to jail for ripping off a few thousand investors who willingly gave Madoff their Money, and the Con Artists in Government and Their Allies Repped Off A Couple of Hundred Million U.S. Citizens who work and pay taxes and We, the Tax Payers Did Not Willingly Hand Over Our Money to Government to Do This Ponzie Scheme?

If Madoff is in prison for Ripping Off Willing Investors, then why are not Many In Government and Especially At Fannie and Freddie not in Prison along side of Bernie for ripping off We, The People, who did not willingly Invest in the Quasi-Government Ponzie Scheme?

Just some food for thought.
RJBJr Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 8:15 AM
Our prosperity came because of Geography, not Freedom. We were protected during two world wars as the manufacturing industry of our competitors was totally destroyed. We made the goods the world needed.

But, as our industries grew very large without competition, they perpetuated flaws and inefficiencies. When the rest of the world recovered, we found ourselves unable to compete. Our FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM actually supresses creativity and provides rewards for those who don't earn it.

Our industry leaders no longer have to take risks. They are "too big to fail". Run a company into the ground and you might lose your job, but you go out with millions in your golden parachute. Lose billions for your investors and give yourself millions in bonuses. Put millions of Americans out of work by shipping jobs to China and make millions from stock options.

I don't call that free to fail. We need not only to fix government, but industry as well. We will only be free when people are rewarded for performance and go broke for failure.
Pistol Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 7:18 AM
Freedom works. Free people do lots of highly visible stupid things. However, they are forced to deal with the results and tend to do better over time. Unaccountable bureaucrats/politicians do more seriously stupid things, and keep escalating and repeating them because they don't have to endure the results. Indeed, they often move swiftly to exclude themselves from the results of strictures they force on others. In short, freedom is the worst of conditions, except for all others.

A government has nothing to give except what it confiscates. To provide all, it must confiscate all. The worst result is that the amount of "all" shrinks, the more that government confiscates it. Perfect distribution of nothing equals nothing for all.