Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, March 24, 2008
Donald Lambro :: Townhall.com Columnist
Presidential 'Race' Begins to Matter
by Donald Lambro
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
With unemployment at 10.2%, what will happen by the end of Obama's first term?



WASHINGTON -- The 2008 presidential election is about seven months away, the Democrats' nomination process faces a deadlock that threatens to split the party, and both its candidates are trailing John McCain.

It wasn't supposed to be this way. With the Republicans presiding over an unpopular war, the economy in turmoil, the housing and credit markets in a slump, skyrocketing gas prices and the legislative agenda in gridlock, the conventional wisdom holds that the GOP stands little chance of retaining the White House in such a bleak political environment.

But in an unexpected turn of events, the Democratic candidates are on the defensive, and McCain is leading them in the latest Reuters news poll by six to eight points. Freshman Sen. Barack Obama has been reluctantly forced to explain a 20-year relationship with Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the pastor of his church whose hateful racial condemnation of white America threatens to seriously damage his presidential bid. Indeed, his downturn in the polls suggests this damage has already been done.

Sen. Hillary Clinton has been forced to release over 11,000 pages of her White House schedules, which suggest her claim to have played a major policy role in the Clinton years was wildly exaggerated. The schedules show the first lady, especially after the collapse of her failed health care plan, in largely ceremonial activities that had little if anything to do with presidential-level responsibilities.

Worse, the documents serve to remind voters of those scandal-ridden years, the nonstop investigations, sworn depositions and even the fact that she was in the White House during Bill Clinton's sexual shenanigans with intern Monica Lewinsky. Not the kind of memories a presidential candidate wants dredged up in the midst of a problematic, floundering campaign.

Meanwhile, the bickering between the two Democratic candidates over Florida and Michigan, which have been stripped of their convention delegates by Democratic officials for violating party rules, continued -- feeding an image of a party that couldn't organize a two-car funeral, let alone run the country.

On the other side of the Atlantic, McCain was on a fact-finding foreign policy trip to meet with overseas leaders, assessing the situation in Iraq and burnishing his defense and foreign policy credentials to be commander-in-chief.

The contrast couldn't have been sharper: Democrats doing what they are known for -- fighting with one another, while McCain takes care of business.

The Rev. Wright story seems to have receded since Obama's high-risk speech in Philadelphia last week, but it is unlikely to fully disappear for long. Strategists in both parties say that the man Barack Obama has called a mentor harbors a long history of racist remarks that will be rediscovered as the Democratic presidential campaign continues. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Donald Lambro's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Chelsea's mean remark
Please give us a break. If you choose to run for the highest office of the United States of American, there is no question, that a potential voter can ask that is none of their business, particularly when the subject matter was played out in our white house while Bill was supposedly working in service to the American people. Especially when many of us are concerned about that same stuff happening again if Hillary should bring Bill back into the White House.

And incidentally, Chelsea being a spokes person for her mother also needs to be open to scrutiny. When Hillary takes her out of the role of ‘protected daughter’ and makes her a spokes person working for the campaign Chelsea becomes accountable to the people for the words she says on behalf of her mother and the manner in which she says them.

Hillary and Bill do not hesitate to dig up dirt on everyone who opposes her, so we have two standards it seems. We are not allowed to ask about the facts, which are not rumors but are the truth. So does that mean, us simple voters have no right to ask about certain things, because someone is elite and above our scrutiny? I disagree, their behavior while in public office, note 'Public Office', has to be made public and explained to all. How unkind of Chelsea to say what she said in the snobbish mean way to a voter. It is a legitimate question should have been answered in such a way to not dishonor the person who asked.

Her Reputation is poor in Europe
Hillary is a past master at turning things in such a way that the issues are obscured. She does this by attacking the person and dishonoring them to win, the ends supposedly justifying the means. These tactics are probably good for a candidate for CEO of some highly competitive company, but not a candidate for the presidency; we need a diplomat for that position. Diplomacy is what we desperately need in the presidency no matter the gender.

I remember when I lived in Europe how our European friends laughed and said really crude things about Hillary, saying that she was the one who wore the pants in the family and that Bill didn't dare do anything without Hillary's permission. If there was talk like that about her then, what is their opinion of her now, or will be I doubt that has changed much?

I watch all of the news channels as I work at home, and I see Hillary slightly change Obama's and other's words until they are presented incorrectly. We already have people accusing President Bush of those exact things. I would hate to see someone in the highest office of the United States wielding that skill and establishing that skill as an example for our next generation.

Our first woman candidate for the presidency must not have questionable baggage.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.