Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, February 07, 2008
Donald Lambro :: Townhall.com Columnist
Tax-and-Spend Democrats Just Don't Get It
by Donald Lambro
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Barack Obama, Clinton's chief rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, talks a lot about "investment" but not in the way that it is used in the real world.

Obama would also raise the top tax rate on the wealthiest Americans to nearly 40 percent from 35 percent and boost taxes on corporations, capital gains and dividends.

"He doesn't favor giving special tax incentives for oil companies and for other corporations," said Austan Goolsbee, an Obama economic adviser at the University of Chicago.

Instead, he would "invest" this money in long-term growth, Goolsbee told me. "He is for programs that are about investing in science and technology, improving work skills, investing in alternative energy and transition from school to work programs."

This raises the question about who is the better investor. Who can peer into the future and know what are the technological innovations that will create new and as yet unseen markets and produce tomorrow's jobs -- Obama or the free market?

The Illinois senator has no background in investment, and no experience or record in the picking the technological advances that have made U.S. firms like Intel, Apple and Microsoft the most successful high-tech corporations on the planet.

The free market provided the venture capital that turned these and other successful start-up businesses into major job-creating machines, making the United States the richest and most successful economy in the world.

And who provided the capital investment that built them? That's right, the millions of investors that Clinton and Obama want to tax more so that they and a bunch of bureaucrats will be the ones to decide how that money should be spent instead of invested.

Not too long ago, Clinton said, "I've got a lot of ideas" how to grow the government. So does Obama. One of the first things he would do as president is to raise the federal minimum wage each year, every year. What he doesn't understand is that he would be pricing entry-level jobs out of existence as businesses find less labor-intensive ways to deliver the same product or service at a lower cost.

Go to a local supermarket and look at all those self-service checkout registers and you'll see what I mean.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Donald Lambro's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Hey Hitchhiker
As you state, "As to your second table of data. One would expect that a certain percentage of a million would be a larger number than the same percentage of 100. Is there a point?"

It wasn't even the SAME percentage...the wealthy basically received about a THREE PERCENT rebate and the average INCOME earner about a TEN PERCENT rebate, while those who paid NO INCOME TAX a HANDOUT check equal to the ten percent middle income earner....simple math shows this

Say MR/MRS wealth paid $100,000 in INCOME TAX and they received a three percent rebate (return of their money)That was $3000.00 which is pretty much the figure the dems started tossing out.

Now Mr/MRs average paid $3000.00 in INCOME TAX and they received a TEN PERCENT rebate (return of their money) That was about $300 again the figure most tossed around...all the cry babies did was start comparing the DOLLAR amount to enflame people through the ages old ploy and deadly sin of ENVY......and it WORKED (says how immature so many are in this country not to mention dumbed down)....and then lets not forget that those who paid ZERO income tax received about the same $300 HAND OUT check.......No one wants to talk about where that money came from, but it certainly didn't come from Mr/MRS Middle Income now did it?

The more people whine about this nonesense the more convinced I am that the majority in this country have about the emotional maturity and corresponding intellect of a seventh grader and that is giving the benefit of the doubt.

lightening_fast_draw
The statistics just like polls can be deliberately skewed. The fact is that Clinton inherited a robust economy from Reagan and BUSH 41....he drove it inot the ground, dessimated our military and by the time G. W. took office (even before the election) we were sliding into a recession. There has NEVER been a time in the history of this nation where we have engaged in War and NOT had deficit spending. Now add to that the fact the G.W. had to build up a completely dismanteled military and where do you think the money was to come from? Finally the Dems...even before 2001 got here and before G.W had submitted his first budget PROPOSAL to the congress (and The Charlie Rangel's of the World) who approved it were screaming recession.

How does one cause a recession BEFORE they even submit their FIRST budge proposal...

The entire dog and pony show was about spin and twisting and the sin of ommission....then consider it takes another YEAR or so AFTER budget approval and all the TACKED ON EARMARKS again by the congress.....to even see the first effects of the changes. So it is an outright lie that G. W. Bush caused the recession that we were already in ..and a distortion of truth and ommission of FACT to claim that his deficit spending (again approved and voted on by the congress) was ALL G. W. Bush's fault.

To continue to do so and say such things is absolutely CHILDISH..and I for one outgrew kindergarten when I was five.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.