Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Dennis Prager :: Townhall.com Columnist
False Equation: Opposing Same-Sex Marriage and Opposing Interracial Marriage
by Dennis Prager
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

The most effective of all morality-based arguments for same-sex marriage, the one that persuades more people than any other argument, is the one that equates opposition to same-sex marriage with the old opposition to interracial marriage.

The argument, repeated so often that it sounds incontestable, is this: Just as parts of American society once had immoral laws that forbade whites and blacks from marrying, so, today, society continues to have immoral laws forbidding men from marrying men and women from marrying women. And just as decent people overthrew the former, decent people must overthrow the latter.

Thanks in large part to widespread higher education -- the higher the educational level, the more one is likely to hold this view -- vast numbers of Americans believe in this equation of sex (gender) and race.

But the equation is false.

First, there is no comparison between sex and race.

There are enormous differences between men and women, but there are no differences between people of different races. Men and women are inherently different, but blacks and whites (and yellows and browns) are inherently the same. Therefore, any imposed separation by race can never be moral or even rational; on the other hand, separation by sex can be both morally desirable and rational. Separate bathrooms for men and women is moral and rational; separate bathrooms for blacks and whites is not.

The second reason the parallel between opposing same-sex marriage and opposing interracial marriage is invalid is that opposition to marriage between races is a moral aberration while opposition to marrying a person of the same sex is the moral norm. In other words, none of the moral bases of American society, whether religious or secular, opposed interracial marriage -- not Judaism, not Christianity, not Judeo-Christian values, not deism, not humanism, not the Enlightenment. Yes, there were religious and secular individuals who opposed interracial marriage, but by opposing interracial marriage, they were advocating something against all Judeo-Christian and secular norms, all of which saw nothing wrong in members of different races intermarrying (members of different religions was a different matter). Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dennis Prager is a radio show host, contributing columnist for Townhall.com, and author of 4 books including Happiness Is a Serious Problem: A Human Nature Repair Manual.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Dennis Prager's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Cindy, get your facts straight
1)The Bible is quite in favor of interracial marriage as Moses married a Black woman and when Aaron and Miriam objected they were both chastised and punished for it. 2)No one is talking about aprobation of gays. That is why we hear ENDLESSLY about gays in media and entertainment and many people are just getting sick of it. 3)Prager stated that the Judeo-Christian tradition was not opposed to interracial marriage. That is correct. For most of the history of the Western world until the 17th century, there were NO PROHIBITIONS against interracial marriage. It was an imposition of racism put on marriage.

Now let's get some things clear. 1)2 gay men or women of any racial background cannot produce children on their own and raise them as mother and father. However 2 people of opposite sexes yet different races can produce children and raise them as mother and father. 2)There is no significant different between the races as Prager points out yet you ignore. There are enormous differences between the sexes, which again you ignore. 3)Societies have viewed and treated homosexuality with praise in literature and art such as in China and Japan, yet never had same-sex marriage. Were they engaging in hatred of gays or aprobation? Of course not. They had marriage as between men and women as marriage is primarily to set up a home to bear children and provide for them. The wants of adults are far subodrinate to the needs of children and society.

Slavery was considered moral for eons
Prager goes on and on about how prohibitions on interracial marriage were always considered immoral. That's a flat out lie. 35 states in the Union had laws on their books prohibiting interracial marriage when the Supreme Court held such laws were unconstitutional in Loving v. Virginia. Moreover, the Bible was regularly used to support anti-miscegenation laws. Same goes for slavery.

Slavery is actually the better analogy. Slavery was widespread on the entire planet until 150 years ago. Every culture practiced it. Slavery is in the Bible (there are long passages devoted to the taking of slaves and the proper treatment of slaves). The fact that eons practiced slavery doesn't make it "moral" under today's sensibilities. The idea that someone could keep another human in captivity, forcing them to serve, is repugnant today. But for many thousands of years, it was completely ok.



So, what constitutes "moral" behavior shifts as the human race matures.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.