Join The Debate!

A Deeper Explanation?

I wonder if the explanation isn't deeper.

When I was an engineering undergraduate, I observed that the engineers tended to be politically conservative, while the liberal arts majors tended to be politically liberal. I thought then that maybe it had something to do with engineering being, necessarily, rooted in physical reality.

Somewhere since, I've read that societies with beautiful languages -- e.g., Arabic (or French) -- tend to more disconnection from hard reality and absorption into verbal fantasies. "But it sounds so good!"

Or perhaps we've made the mistake in Journalism that we made in Teaching. The teachers colleges focused intently on pedagogy -- how to teach. The unintended nasty side effect was that we graduated many people who were very skillful at getting ideas out of their heads and into the students', but who had no ideas inside their head that were worth knowing! I wonder if Journalism programs haven't made the same mistake: With the exception of sports reporters, few journalism graduates know very much about the subjects they report on. (And television has aggravated that, with news "readers" whose prime job qualification seems to be their well coiffed hair-do.)

Reporters deal heavily in words. And they believe in words. Too often, those words construct a fantasy. And most graduates of Journalism schools -- in spite of their preening to the contrary -- never acquired the critical skills to question whatever some slick & smiling politician tells them.