Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, January 14, 2008
Craig Shirley :: Townhall.com Columnist
It's Freedom, Stupid
by Craig Shirley
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


The GOP no longer recognizes the meaning of the term “public servant” or abides by the Jeffersonian notion that power flows upwards from the people to the government, not the other way around.

Several years ago at a Board meeting of the American Conservative Union, an official from the White House asked to present the Administration’s plan on immigration. At the conclusion of the Bush aide’s presentation, someone asked the question: “Why did the President denounce the Minutemen as “vigilantes?” The aide’s reply was both instructive and disappointing. He simply said, “Because they weren’t authorized.” His answer told us all that conservatives need to know about the modern GOP.

Today’s Republicans are really reconstructed Tories, defending the status quo from on-high on the firm belief that power flows downward. True American conservatives have always believed that power flows up from the people and the status quo must always be challenged. They believed individual Americans rule their government, the government does not rule the people. The Constitution is a check on government, not the people.

Ronald Reagan never would have called the Minutemen “vigilantes.” Reagan, the great conservative populist, would have considered the Minutemen no different than a volunteer firefighter or those who make citizen’s arrests.

Karl Rove saw Bush as the 21st Century’s William McKinley and himself as Mark Hanna. Hanna, McKinley’s political operative, married the GOP and corporate America into a governing behemoth, long before FDR’s Harry Hopkins coined the phrase, ‘tax and tax, spend and spend, elect and elect.” Rove, Tom Delay and others quite clearly wanted to do the same with the 21st Century Republican Party.

The GOP’s new reason to be has led former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee to proclaim that if elected president, he would ban smoking in the United States. Huckabee, like many in the GOP, wants to remake the GOP as the “Mommycrat” party. The remaining Reagan conservatives in the party want neither the “Big Socialist Sisterism” of Hillary Clinton nor the “Big Christian Brotherism” of Huckabee. They want Republican leaders to once and for all stop pandering and recognize the proper and limited role of American government. The GOP must take their fingers off the throats of their fellow Americans and stop telling us how much they care.

In 1980, a reporter asked Ronald Reagan for his view of government. He simply and elegantly replied that the role of government was to protect us from each other and not to protect us from ourselves. No Reaganite – no real conservative -- would even think of banning smoking in America. The GOP is no longer the party of expanding freedom but increasing security. From Lincoln to Teddy Roosevelt to Reagan, all understood that the expansion of freedom was what the GOP should stand for and this is what would make it great and successful. And that it would only be successful by challenging the status quo through a framework of freedom, rather than defending it through a framework of arrogance and corrupt power.

The French Revolution ended in what was called the “Thermidor” as the revolution collapsed amidst betrayal, corruption and hubris. So too the modern GOP may be facing its own demise, although it will probably come with a whimper—not with show trials and beheadings.

Some would say more’s the pity.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Craig Shirley is the president of Shirley & Banister Public Affairs and the author of a history of the 1976 campaign, Reagan's Revolution: The Untold Story of the Campaign That Started it All. He is now writing a book about the 1980 campaign, Rendezvous with Destiny.

Be the first to read Craig Shirley's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

MellorSJ2 - Part 4 of 4


MellorSJ2: “or better yet, claim that--although we believe it *all*--the newer stuff supersedes the old stuff (and, in a lovely anti-Semitic touch, the old nasty stuff only applies to Jews);”


That’s not a “lovely anti-Semitic touch”, and I know you know better. That’s the truth according to the Jews themselves. Why don’t you ask them? Ask a Jew if the Law of Moses applies to all mankind, or if it was only given to Israel?


Or ask Malachi:

“Remember ye the law of Moses my servant, which I commanded unto him in Horeb for all Israel, [with] the statutes and judgments.” (Malachi 4:4, KJV)



Better yet, let Moses tell you himself:

"And Moses called all Israel, and said unto them, Hear, O Israel, the statutes and judgments which I speak in your ears this day, that ye may learn them, and keep, and do them. [2] The LORD our God made a covenant with us in Horeb. [3] The LORD made not this covenant with our fathers, but with us, [even] us, who [are] all of us here alive this day." (Deuteronomy 5:1-3)


And regarding “newer stuff supersedes the old stuff”, the Old Testament promised a New Testament (Jeremiah 31:31). God spoke through the prophet Isaiah of the days to come when the new law would go forth from Jerusalem (Isaiah 2:2-4). In the New Testament, the Apostle Paul, inspired by God, stated that the law of Moses had been given until the seed, which is Christ Jesus, had come (Galatians 3:19-27).


It is NOT “anti-Semitic” to declare the truth that the Law of Moses was given to the Jews only. They were chosen by God, there’s nothing “anti” about that… what higher honor could there be? The Law of Moses had a purpose, and it was fulfilled, according God’s plan. And there is no “old nasty stuff” in the OT; it is ALL God’s Word that you are talking about.


Your decision not to understand it does not make it “nasty stuff”. It just makes you ignorant of the truth, but you can change that, and I hope you will.


MellorSJ2 - Part 3 of 4


MellorSJ2 writes: “change practice explicitly (like the LDSers and blacks, Coca Cola etc),”

I don’t know what the reference to “Coca-Cola” means.


You can’t lay blame for people changing practices that were never given by God in the first place at God’s feet; we need to lay that blame where it belongs - with man.


You cite the LDS, and I agree, but what became called the Roman Catholic Church has done the same thing for nearly eighteen centuries. They won’t like it that I say that, but it’s not personal, I just want the truth. I’m happy to discuss the ‘short list’ of 66 practices/doctrines of the RCC going back to 200AD, since before it was even called the RCC, and none of them can be reconciled or harmonized with God’s Word in the Bible.


The Protestant denominational churches each have practices that cannot be reconciled or harmonized with God’s Word too, I’m not singling out Roman Catholics or Mormons. All of the division that gives people like yourself so much ammunition against Christianity is the result of men, nearly always with good intentions, choosing to do things which cannot and will never be reconciled with God’s Word.


An un-Scriptural practice may be small at first, it almost always is, otherwise there would be loud protest against it. But if it starts small, error gains a foothold. After a time, the error becomes established “tradition”. Once error is established and accepted, it then (naturally) becomes the basis for *new* doctrine. And on it goes. Extrapolate that process over 200 years, over 500 years, or over nearly 1,800 years, and you will see just how far away men can get from the truth of God’s Word.


All because they once allowed a small error to become a part of their practices and beliefs.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.