Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, October 09, 2008
Bob Barr :: Townhall.com Columnist
Wall Street Benefits Twice from Bailouts
by Bob Barr
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



Senator John McCain attempted to disguise reality by calling the $700 billion Wall Street bailout a “rescue,” but it’s obvious that the only people he and his colleagues were rescuing were the executives who had made bad investment decisions, as well as the politicians who had pushed increased mortgage lending, irrespective of cost, triggering today’s crisis. Now it turns out that the companies getting bailed out will benefit twice.

Most everyone has seen the story of how executives at AIG partied at a resort after the taxpayers were stuck with the bill for an $85 billion bailout—now being supplemented with another Federal Reserve loan of $37.8 billion. But what’s $440,000, including more than $23,380 for spa services, among friends when the taxpayers are paying?

Normally politicians wouldn’t have any business complaining about the cost of a corporate retreat, but what might be unexceptional for high-flying companies in a booming economy becomes outrageous when taxpayers are getting stuck with the bill.  In this case they are paying twice, with the company collecting a new loan because its bottom line is even worse than originally thought.  

Loan-two to AIG is small change compared to the extra benefits that Wall Street will receive.  Many of the largest firms will be going to the spa, figuratively, at least.  You see, someone has to manage all of the securities and other assets that the government plans on buying with taxpayer funds.  And who better to manage them than the very companies that bought the bad paper in the first place!

The Treasury Department has requested proposals for asset managers, and according to the Wall Street Journal, the government “wants large, established firms with significant assets to work for the government’s program.”  That means managing at least $25 billion, and in some cases at least $100 billion, in private assets.  There will be a lot of money in fees—typically 1 percent of the assets managed, which could come to as much as $7 billion a year or more if government purchases go past $700 billion, as is widely expected.

Wall Street is looking forward to milking this latest cash cow.  Since government jumped into the investment business, the Journal tells us that “a range of firms—from large investment banks to boutique real-estate companies—have been angling to grab some of the advisory business.”   Representatives of some companies showed up in Washington to lobby even before Congress approved the bailout.  And who can blame them?  The Journal reports that “sales, financing and other traditional forms of real estate business have dried up with the credit crisis.”

Of course, most of these firms helped cause that very crisis.  Most of the companies bidding for government business are suffering big losses and preparing to unload lots of bad paper on the government.  Bad paper that other big companies with big losses and lots of bad paper will manage.  

And so the circle will go on endlessly, at taxpayer expense.


The only problem is potential conflicts of interest, since companies will, notes the Washington Post, “be managing the assets while also selling their own troubled securities to the government.”  But officials say they will attempt to “minimize” any conflict.  No doubt, Washington won’t let a little thing like ethics stand in the way of letting everyone on Wall Street profit.

Indeed, politics are starting even before the president’s signature on the bill is dry.  One analyst predicts that the Treasury Department will focus bailout funds on regional banks and thrifts, thereby providing “critical political support for Treasury’s efforts.”  After all, “Congressmen who had to swallow hard to vote for this think will feel a lot better about it if they see the impact in their local communities.”  Which is just another name for pork, like the spending programs and tax preferences loaded into the $700 billion bailout bill to win votes for passage.

All of this is politics as usual in Washington, and it won’t change whether Sen. Barack Obama or Sen. John McCain is elected president.  Both of them supported the $700 billion Wall Street bailout, as well as the many other bailouts that preceded it.  Both of them are part of the political establishment that helped create today’s economic problems. Neither of them will take the steps necessary to ensure that this sort of economic crisis doesn’t hit again.  Only Bob Barr and the Libertarian Party are offering the sort of fundamental change that the American people need and deserve.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Bob Barr is the 2008 Libertarian nominee for President of the United States.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Bob Barr's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Don't Be Fooled
"Republicans have become the party of fear and Democrats the party of hate..." - Bob Barr

Libertarians are the party of Liberty.

Fear, hate, Liberty...which do you support?

http://www.bobbarr2008.com

Anne and others
Do you know what a coonass is? Many who are a coonass view the term with pride, others don't. It is very similar to the term redneck. Rude, ignorant, and arrogant I may be, but at least I know what an actual Marxist and communist is and Obama is not. Taken as a whole or taken in part. And Anne I'm still here. As for name calling, your friend Summers (the woman of the thousand names) engages in that first (as do you since neither of you have anything of substance to say). And I tend to have a zero first-use policy in regards to that--she called me a Formosan Termite and I called her a coonass in response.

As for other comments, while one can debate the US forces in Iraq today as a force of occupation, there is no debate that under the CPA, the US was a force of occupation--from April 9, 2003 until June 28, 2004 just as the US troops in Japan under SCAP from late August 1945 until September 8, 1951 were a force of occupation (something our expert Anne doesn't accept).

Barr is getting around 1% support, so he will have zero impact on McCain losing and he will lose.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.