Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, November 06, 2008
Ben Shapiro :: Townhall.com Columnist
Americans Embrace Childish Unity
by Ben Shapiro
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Barack Obama was the vessel for that movement. He was an utter cipher. But he embodied the need of the American public for unity by hearkening back to the ultimate unifying feature of American life: third-grade slogans. He spouted Hope and Change. He told us, “We’re All Americans.” He told us, “Yes, We Can.”

From any other politician, it would be ridiculous drivel. From a black candidate, it was inspiring. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson didn’t talk like that -- they spoke the language of division. Because Obama spoke the language of unity, he had to be a moderate. So went our logic.

Barack Obama had us from the moment he said, “Hope.” In that moment, Obama accomplished two simultaneous transformations. First, he transformed himself into a moderate. Second, he transformed himself into a messianic figure, the object of our longing: the physical embodiment of America’s progression beyond racial conflict. If America wanted to move beyond conflict, what better way than to embrace a candidate who could end all racial conflict?

And the Obama campaign subtly played on this theme. They implied that if we voted against him, we were engaging in racial hatred; some supporters even implied America would undergo a race war if he lost. That’s the last thing we wanted.

We wanted to feel good again. That is what the Great Election of 2008 was about. It was about Americans’ desire to feel a part of Something Larger. To do something together, as Americans. In today’s day and age, that Something Larger cannot be the America Ronald Reagan preached about -- the left has attacked that America as racist, sexist, and selfish. That Something Larger had to be an individual who could provide us with the feeling of unity.

Barack Obama told us that we could do Something Larger simply by voting for him. When he said, “Yes We Can,” and we followed by screaming it, chanting it, shouting his name in unison, we were Doing Something Larger. We were uniting.

America has always recognized that unity for its own sake is useless at best and dangerous at worst. Unifying behind a mysterious charismatic figure promising transformational change may make us feel good, but it is a betrayal of the open and honest governmental debate our Founding Fathers sought and so many Americans have fought and died to preserve.

Americans think they grew up during Election 2008. They think they moved beyond the past. In one way they did. In another, more important way, they regressed dramatically -- to a time before politics mattered. In the next four years, there will be plenty of growing up to do.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ben Shapiro is a regular guest on dozens of radio shows around the United States and Canada and author of Project President: Bad Hair and Botox on the Road to the White House.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ben Shapiro's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Derek / Tiffany 2
...con't

Tiffany said:
"The government has contributed *nothing* to the establishment of that wealth or the capital used to create it." This is a fundamental belief of right-wingers, and ignorantly incorrect. Every wealthy person in this country (and every wealthy wanna-be) is under the impression that they -and only they- are responsible for their success. OK, say you alone built a very successful business in the US. Did you take advantage of:
- any staff you hired who came to you with 20 years of gov't funded education
- any roads, air traffic, postal services, Internet or other public infrastructure that is essential to your business
- any health care benefits that you or your staff may have gotten from gov't
- a healthy and vibrant middle class to which you could sell your products or services
- police, rule of law, military protection

If you answered yes, they you should realize that it takes more than one smart (and lucky) businessperson to build a succesful company. It's BS pride to take all the credit. You could be the smartest dude in Swaziland, but you just don't have the environment to build a business like the USA gives you. That's not a credit to you, it's credit to the USA. So what's wrong with kicking back a little of your success in order to help those that may follow, as those that preceded have helped you.

Derek / Tiffany 1
Tiffany,

Wow! I'm sensing a lot of anger there. How about I argue back a little, since most people at TownHall are unlikely to take that role:

You said: "Nobody with a rudimentary understanding of economics could hold back scorn on any dimwit who espoused such a view."

OK, I sense the attack on my smarts. How about you tell me at which top 10 school you got your undergraduate econ degree, and your MBA, and I'll tell you from which ones I got mine. Hint: Think east coast ivy league elitist. Oh, I also leverage that training with running two small businesses and a 145 IQ. But you figure anyone with a different opinion is a "dimwit". That's not so. Just a different opinion. If you are certain that one of us is a dimwit, I'm willing to take any intelligence test with you to see which it is.

"To wit: you live in a country who's free market has created the greatest prosperity ever enjoyed by anyone anywhere in human history"

Debatable. And although the US is the only place I want to live, there is empirical evidence (such as UN std. of living studies) which indicate other countries can be perceived as better. It's dangerous when flag wavers like you ASSUME we are the best and will always be so. We need to WORK to be the best and must always continue to do so. Sitting on laurels just makes them flat.

"including the poorest levels of society."
Well, that's just wrong. Even you must admit that the poor are better in more left-leaning countries.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.