Don’t Panic About Trump’s Iran Strategy Just Yet
If You Missed Last Night's NBA Finals Game, You Missed Absolute Cinema
The Truth Is Simple: Democrats Don’t Care About Anything but Gaining Power
Here Is Leftist Government
The 60 Minutes Controversy
The War No One Else Is Fighting
Trump Goes to the NBA Finals — Look Who Attacked Him
Who'll Stop the Fraud?
A Villainous Blueprint for Managed Poverty
Donald Trump Is Personally Making Antitrust Sane Again
When Abortion Has a Face
Washington's Debt Problem Is Every Investor's Problem
The GOP's Quiet Rebellion: What It Means for Trump, Congress and the Supreme...
Nine Convicted in Ohio Drug Ring That Mixed Fentanyl Trafficking With $4.5M COVID-19...
Democrat Calls Republicans Fascists, Wishes He Could 'Run Over' Trump at Congressional Bas...
Tipsheet

Sotomayor and “Secret Law”

Sotomayor and “Secret Law”
Guest post from Ilya Shapiro

Sotomayor didn’t have much to say in response to Senator Feingold’s inquiries regarding national security law and civil liberties post-9/11, but the Wisconsin lawmaker’s questions about “secret law”—on which he didn’t press the nominee’s non-answers—made me think of the following: Both
Advertisement
Ricci (the infamous firefighters race discrimination case) and Didden (the property rights violation case I mentioned in my previous post) were “unpublished” summary dispositions.  If Sotomayor had not been nominated to the Supreme Court, causing hundreds if not thousands of lawyers to comb through her judicial opinions, would anyone have uncovered these blatant attempts to sweep controversial legal issues under the rug?  Are Ricci and Didden Sotomayor’s secret law?

Ilya Shapiro is Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies at the Cato Institute and Editor-in-Chief, Cato Supreme Court Review

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos