It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

The Most Ridiculous Lawsuit of the Month - The "Flippin' the Birds" Edition

The Most Ridiculous Lawsuit of the Month - The "Flippin' the Birds" Edition

A few years ago, a group of five peacocks mysteriously arrived in a Michigan neighborhood.  No one has ever found where the birds came from, but 80 members of the community recently signed a petition to let them stay.  Why the petition now, after years of peaceful squatting?  It’s in response to a lawsuit filed by a resident who thinks the birds are a nuisance that have created “dangerous, offensive, or hazardous conditions.”

Advertisement

The suit accuses a local wildlife rescue organization of feeding the birds and sheltering them during the harsh Michigan winters, which the birds would supposedly not be able to survive otherwise.  The rescue group responds that they do occasionally feed the birds (as do most of the people in the neighborhood) but do not provide them any shelter, and the peacocks simply roost with native species during the colder months.

Animal control officers have put out traps for the birds but so far haven’t caught any, so the plaintiff now wants to force the wildlife rescue group to remove the birds.  Oh yeah, and they want monetary damages too.

The Michigan Department of Natural Resources obviously doesn’t consider the peacock an indigenous species, but it does have a list of 29 other birds native to the state that can pose as much of a nuisance threat as the peacock, none of which are mentioned in the plaintiffs’ suit (so far).  They also have a list of hardier animals like cougar, moose, and badgers (oddly enough, the famous Michigan wolverine isn’t named – maybe the “dangerous” peacocks scared them off?)

So is this the most ridiculous lawsuit of the month?  Or is it one of these instead:

Advertisement

·         the woman suing the maker of her K-cup coffee pods, alleging that the product is not “fresh” and “delicious” as advertised

·         the man suing a grocer for $15,000 after he pricked his finger on a rose’s thorn

·         the Arkansas couple claiming that seismic activity was caused by fracking process

·         the woman who hired a lawyer to sue over false advertising claims before she actually bought the product

Vote at FacesOfLawsuitAbuse.org!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement