Florida Dem Who Suffered a Meltdown When New Maps Were Passed Has Been...
Former Mumford and Sons Member Was Not Happy With What This Guest Said...
Law Professor Calls Out Democrat Lawyer for His Insane Take on the VA...
Fetterman: Democratic Base Is Becoming Increasingly Anti-American
A Woman Noticed a Red Spot on Her Tongue. It Almost Killed Her
The Humanitarian Aid Machine Cannot Be Bamboozled by Gaza
A Silver Lining to Leftist Street Violence
Wes Moore Wants Four More Years. Maryland Families Should Say 'No More.'
Great Nations Aren't Destroyed by Enemies. They're Destroyed by Debt.
The Electoral College and American Freedom
The United Arab Emirates Is Playing Its Own Game
In War, There Is No Substitute for Victory
The HRC Scorecard Retreat Is Progress, but Corporations Must Stop Funding Harm to...
Global Gender Battle
The Cooks Will Finally Eat Their Own Cooking
Tipsheet

GOP Rebellion Against Funding Deal Brings Legislative Business to a Standstill

GOP Rebellion Against Funding Deal Brings Legislative Business to a Standstill
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Several Republican members of the House of Representatives brought legislative business to a halt in the lower chamber on Wednesday afternoon, the latest rebellion launched by disgruntled conservatives, many of whom are in the House Freedom Caucus, against the House's GOP leadership regardless of who holds the gavel. 

Advertisement

During a routine vote on the rule to debate legislation on the House floor, 13 House Republicans voted "nay" on the rule, defeating it 216-203.  

The Republican members voting against the rule and joining in the protest were Reps. Andy Biggs (R-AZ), Eric Burlison (R-MO), Eli Crane (R-AZ), Bob Good (R-VA), Paul Gosar (R-AZ), Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), Ralph Norman (R-SC), Andy Ogles (R-TN), Scott Perry (R-PA), Matt Rosendale (R-MT), and Chip Roy (R-TX). House GOP Conference Vice Chair Blake Moore (R-UT) also voted against the rule — but not in protest — changing his vote from "aye" at the last minute in a procedural move that allows him to bring the rule back to a vote at a later date. 

Advertisement

Related:

SPENDING

That vote halted consideration of three non-spending related pieces of legislation, but was launched as a protest to the topline funding agreement for fiscal year 2024 reached by congressional leaders — namely House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) — which was announced on Sunday.

The same type of legislative gamesmanship was used repeatedly by the Freedom Caucus against former Speaker Kevin McCarthy in similar attempts to punish GOP leadership for agreements or decisions with which its members disagreed. 

Rep. Biggs explained that the latest show of force was because his compatriots "don’t have a great deal of opportunity to express our disapprobation," according to Politico. 

Still on the same side of the aisle but on opposite sides of the funding deal, Speaker Johnson has sought to emphasize the conservative wins within the topline spending agreement he forged, including a rare cut to non-defense spending for FY2024.

Advertisement

After a continuing resolution was passed in 2023 to avoid a government shutdown, there are two rapidly approaching deadlines before which funding bills must be passed if the government is to remain open — January 19 and February 2. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement