KJP Has a Meltdown Over Questions About Lack of FEMA Funding
REMINDER: What the White House Said About Russia's 'Merchant of Death' When Biden...
Atlantic Staff Writer Wrecks Himself Attacking Our Own Katie Pavlich Over Helene Tweets
For Some Reason, Karine Jean-Pierre Got a Promotion
Kamala on '60 Minutes' Delivers Zero Minutes of Logic, Stephanopoulos Has Selective Rhetor...
Anniversary of 10/7 Makes Me Glad for Gun Rights in America
What 'Misinformation' Assaults on First Amendment Mean for Second
Navigating the 2024 Election Amid North Carolina’s Post-Hurricane Helene Crisis
Cue the Outrage As Georgia Supreme Court Reinstates State Abortion Ban
Tillis Sets the Record Straight on Harris Campaign Taking His Words Out of...
The Media Sure Are Noticing a Key Concern About the Harris Campaign
Here's Why This Former Democratic Congressman Endorsed Trump on Anniversary of October 7
Melania Trump Tried to Donate to a University to Help Foster Kids. Here's...
Tom Cotton Destroys NBC's Kristen Welker When She Brings Up 'Misinformation' About FEMA...
Spain's First-Ever Team of 'Trans Men' Competed in Men's Soccer. It Turned Out...
Tipsheet

It's Official: FBI Director to Face Contempt of Congress Proceedings

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

On Monday, the top two lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee finally had the chance to review an FBI report brought to light by a whistleblower that contains information on allegations then-Vice President Biden engaged in a criminal bribery scheme with a foreign national. 

Advertisement

After FBI Director Christopher Wray refused to comply with a subpoena from Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-KY), he was threatened with contempt charges from Congress. He tried offering lawmakers the opportunity to view the document at the FBI's headquarters, but Comer didn't compromise and Wray finally caved, somewhat, late last week, agreeing to bring the document to Capitol Hill to be reviewed and briefed to lawmakers. 

However, after viewing the document, Chairman Comer and Oversight Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD) didn't agree on what they saw, raising even more questions.

In a statement, Comer said that "FBI officials confirmed that the unclassified, FBI-generated record has not been disproven and stated several times the information contained within it is currently being used in an ongoing investigation." Comer added that the "confidential human source who provided information about then-Vice President Biden being involved in a criminal bribery scheme is a trusted, highly credible information who has been used by the FBI for years. These are facts and no amount of spin, and frankly lies, from the White House or Congressional Democrats can change this information," Comer emphasized. 

Still, the FBI refused to turn the report over to the Oversight Committee, leading Comer to double-down on his previous threat to hold Director Wray in contempt of Congress.

Advertisement

“At the briefing, the FBI again refused to hand over the unclassified record to the custody of the House Oversight Committee and we will now initiate contempt of Congress proceedings," Comer said in his statement. "Given the severity and complexity of the allegations contained within this record, Congress must investigate further," he noted. 

"Americans have lost trust in the FBI’s ability to enforce the law impartially and demand answers, transparency, and accountability," Comer continued. "The Oversight Committee must follow the facts for the American people and ensure the federal government is held accountable."

Comer's counterpart — Ranking Member Raskin — however, seemed to be trying his best to spin the reality into a less severe version of what Comer described, as seen in this side-by-side of the two lawmakers' comments after reviewing the report:

Advertisement

As Townhall has pointed out before, it's hard to buy Democrat claims that the report is baseless or without any impact on current investigations given FBI Director Wray's refusal to produce the document — even when under subpoena — and then continue to control access of the document even now under threat of being held in contempt of Congress. If there was no "there," there, why wouldn't it just be released to put conversations about what then-VP Biden was doing to rest?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement