Person of Interest Arrested in Connection to the Abduction of Nancy Guthrie
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
The Press Gets Unwound by Their Solitary Sources, and the NYT Goes Winter...
Chewing the Fat on the Left's 'Body Positivity' Flip Flop
National Nurses Union Calls for the Abolition of ICE
Delaware Smacked Down for Trying to Enforce Law, Ignoring Injunction
The Clintons Are So Over
Tensions Rise At the White House's New Religious Liberty Commission as One Member...
Mike Johnson Blasts Mamdani's DOH for Creating a ‘Global Oppression’ Group Focused on...
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
Woke DC Grand Jury Denies Indictments of Six Democrats Accused of Sedition
The NYT Report on the Marijuana Epidemic Is a Startling Warning
Democrat Attacks Christians, Calls Muslim Jihad on the West a 'Middle Eastern Version...
Even CNN Knows That Democrats Are on the Wrong Side of the Voter...
Ken Paxton Notches Immigration Win As Premier Community for Illegals Pays Out $68...
Tipsheet

Facebook Fined $25 Million for Campaign Law Violations

Facebook's parent company Meta was fined some $25 million on Wednesday after a judge ruled that the company had racked up more than 800 violations of a Washington state campaign transparency law that's been on the books since the 1970s. 

Advertisement

For Meta's repeated violation of Washington law, a county superior court judge ruled that the tech company must pay the maximum possible fine under the statute on a whopping 822 violations for a total of more than $24.6 million.

Meta's attorneys argued in court that Washington's state law was violating the company's First Amendment rights and that it was incongruent with Section 230 protections on platforms such as Meta, but the judge didn't buy those claims.

Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson called out the "arrogance" of Facebook's parent company, which he first filed suit against in 2020. According to the AG's office, Ferguson's win means Meta now must pay what is "the largest campaign finance penalty ever issued anywhere in the country," The Seattle Times noted. Meta's total judgement comes after the judge tripled the usual $10,000-per-offense penalty because this wasn't Meta's first time facing legal action for violating state law. 

Advertisement

Related:

BIG TECH FACEBOOK

In 2018, AG Ferguson also sued Facebook — predating the Meta name — for breaching the same campaign transparency law that requires entities selling political ads to disclose information on who buys ads, who's being targeted with the ad, and how many times the ad is eventually seen. The Seattle Times reported at the time that Facebook said it would stop selling political ads in Washington instead of disclosing information required by the law. But they didn't. 

Judge Douglass North, in ordering the $25 million penalty for Meta, slammed the company's "lack of good faith and failure to acknowledge and take responsibility for its violations." North also explained that he found the company was acting intentionally — given they were sued for previous violations in 2018 and subsequently said they would stop selling political ads in the state but continued to break the law — and should have known better due to Meta's significant activity in political advertising.

Advertisement

The AG said Facebook, now Meta, "intentionally disregarded Washington's election transparency laws," according to The Seattle Times. "I urge Facebook to come to its senses, accept responsibility, apologize for its conduct and comply with the law. If Facebook refuses to do this, we will beat them again in court," Ferguson pledged, hinting that an appeal by Meta could be yet to come.  


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement