Former Dem Operative Wrecks Lib Hopes Over VA's Gerrymandered Map
There Sure Is a Lot of Sexual Harassment Going on In DC
Democrat Lawmaker Wants to Impose Term Limits on Supreme Court Justices
Guess Who the Palisades Arsonist Admired
More Home Health Fraud Has Been Uncovered in Ohio
MS NOW Anchor Proves She Doesn't Know a Single MAGA American
Has the Met Gala Officially Jumped the Woke Shark?
Amy Klobuchar Reveals One of Her Top Priorities If Elected MN Governor. No...
Illegal Alien 'Dreamer' Murdered Two Innocent Women on Long Island
New York City Schools Face Civil Rights Probe Over Anti-Israel Indoctrination
Despite SCOTUS Ruling, New Jersey's AG Is Still Targeting First Choice Pregnancy Centers
Gun Rights Group Asks SCOTUS to Take Up Case of Sailor Convicted of...
Democrat Senators Demand Gun Company Stop Making Legal Product Designed for Young Shooters
Katie Porter Just Released a New Campaign Ad and It's Embarrassing
GOP Hopeful Steve Hilton Has 72% Chance of Advancing to General Election in...
Tipsheet

Psaki Admits Appealing the CDC Mandate Ruling Is All About Preserving Power

Psaki Admits Appealing the CDC Mandate Ruling Is All About Preserving Power
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

In Wednesday's White House press briefing, Jen Psaki was asked about the Biden administration's rather disjointed reaction to a federal judge in Florida striking down the CDC's mask mandate for travelers and its delayed response to the ruling — as Townhall reported earlier this week.

Advertisement

But when given the opportunity to explain and justify the Biden administration's decision to appeal the federal judge's invalidation of the CDC's federal mask mandate, Psaki admitted that the White House would fight the ruling in order to "preserve that authority for the CDC to have in the future." That is, it's not about The Science(TM), it's about protecting power. 

"We are entirely able to, and legally able to, be a part of the discussion," Psaki told reporters about the Biden administration's appeal. "But right now we of course are deferring to the CDC on what they believe is needed at this moment," she said despite the fact that the White House has repeatedly gotten in front of CDC guidance in the past. 

"They've already, they obviously put in place this two week extension because they felt they needed that to take a look at the data given that we've seen a rise in cases, so we certainly anticipate to hear more from them soon on their ask for being able to have that time which we think is entirely warranted," Psaki continued. "And the Department of Justice, as you noted, has indicated that they would appeal not just because they think it's entirely reasonable of course to have this additional time to look at it but because they think that the current, for current and future public health crises, we want to preserve that authority for the CDC to have in the future," she argued. 

Advertisement

Psaki later said the White House's focus following the federal judge's decision was "seeing what power we had to preserve what we felt was in the public health interest of the country." Again, all about power to enforce what they feel, rather than empirical evidence rooted in actual science. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement