I'm So Done With the Communists
The Latest Graham Platner Allegation Just Dropped
Trump Derangement Syndrome Strikes Again As Leftists Root Against US Men's Soccer Team
Prosecutors Are About to Lay Out Their Case Against Charlie Kirk Assassin
Francesca Hong Would Put the Palestinian Cause Ahead of Wisconsin Voters
Bishop Barron Warns Us That Commies Like Mamdani Are a Threat to Religious...
AccuWeather's Cheap Shot at a Sick Child
Mamdani Does Damage Control After His Despicable Anti-American 250th Anniversary Speech
New York Times Columnist Laments the 'Malaise' of America's 250th by Hoping to...
Cuba Just Suffered a Nationwide Blackout
Graham Platner Abruptly Cancels Campaign Event As Rumors Swirl He Plans to Drop...
Trump Administration Doubles Down on Cuba Amid Another Blackout
'Young Washington' Gets a Sequel After Smashing Box Office Expectations
Could the Russia-Ukraine Conflict Finally End?
FIFA Responds to Belgium’s Appeal of Decision to Let Balogun Play in Tonight's...
Tipsheet

Psaki Admits Appealing the CDC Mandate Ruling Is All About Preserving Power

Psaki Admits Appealing the CDC Mandate Ruling Is All About Preserving Power
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

In Wednesday's White House press briefing, Jen Psaki was asked about the Biden administration's rather disjointed reaction to a federal judge in Florida striking down the CDC's mask mandate for travelers and its delayed response to the ruling — as Townhall reported earlier this week.

Advertisement

But when given the opportunity to explain and justify the Biden administration's decision to appeal the federal judge's invalidation of the CDC's federal mask mandate, Psaki admitted that the White House would fight the ruling in order to "preserve that authority for the CDC to have in the future." That is, it's not about The Science(TM), it's about protecting power. 

"We are entirely able to, and legally able to, be a part of the discussion," Psaki told reporters about the Biden administration's appeal. "But right now we of course are deferring to the CDC on what they believe is needed at this moment," she said despite the fact that the White House has repeatedly gotten in front of CDC guidance in the past. 

"They've already, they obviously put in place this two week extension because they felt they needed that to take a look at the data given that we've seen a rise in cases, so we certainly anticipate to hear more from them soon on their ask for being able to have that time which we think is entirely warranted," Psaki continued. "And the Department of Justice, as you noted, has indicated that they would appeal not just because they think it's entirely reasonable of course to have this additional time to look at it but because they think that the current, for current and future public health crises, we want to preserve that authority for the CDC to have in the future," she argued. 

Advertisement

Psaki later said the White House's focus following the federal judge's decision was "seeing what power we had to preserve what we felt was in the public health interest of the country." Again, all about power to enforce what they feel, rather than empirical evidence rooted in actual science. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement