Someone Should Tell That Bucks County Dem Where She Can Shove Her Shoddy...
'S**t Show': Jon Stewart Blasts Dems' Coping Antics Following Their 2024 Election Defeat
Trump's Border Czar Issues a Warning to Dem Politicians Pledging to Shelter Illegal...
Why Again Do We Still Have a Special Relationship With the Tyrannical UK?
Remember Those Two Jordanians Who Tried to Infiltrate a Marine Corps Base? Well…
Celebrate Diversity (Or Else)!
Journos Now Believe the Liar Trump When Convenient, and Did Newsweek Provide the...
To Vet or Not to Vet
Trump: From 'Fascist' to 'Let's Do Lunch'
Newton's Third Law of Politics
Religious Belief and the 2024 Election
Restoring American Strength and Security with Trump’s Cabinet Picks
Linda McMahon to Education May Choke Foreign Influence Operations on Campus
Unburden Us From the Universities
Watch Jasmine Crockett Go On Rant About White People Over the Abolishment of...
Tipsheet

The First Black Woman Nominated to the Supreme Court Can't Define 'Woman'

In a situation almost beyond belief, the individual who's been heralded by the liberal media and Democrats for her historic status as the first black woman to be nominated to the Supreme Court is unable to define "woman," according to her testimony late on Tuesday night.

Advertisement

The somewhat ironic if not tragic revelation came courtesy of a line of questioning from Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) who — even some 13 hours after the hearings started — was fired up and ready to roll.

"Can you provide a definition for the word woman?" Blackburn asked. 

"Can I provide a definition?" Judge Jackson responded somewhat surprised.

"Mhmm, yeah," Blackburn responded.

"I can't," Jackson said.

"You can't?" Blackburn responded.

"Mmm, not in this context — I'm not a biologist," Judge Jackson said.

Yes, really. Here's the exchange in all its unbelievable glory:

So Judge Jackson is expected to be able to interpret the law for all Americans but cannot, evidently, interpret what it means to be a woman enough to offer even a simple definition for the term... because she's not a biologist? Any stranger on the street, a kindergartener, your crazy uncle even, could have offered a better answer to the question. One need not be a biologist to know what a woman is.

But Judge Jackson, as anyone who's been following President Biden's quest to fill the looming Supreme Court vacancy created by Justice Stephen Breyer's retirement, has been touted repeatedly for her identity as a black woman, the first of which to be nominated to the highest court in America.

Advertisement

From the word go, the White House has emphasized that "she will be the first Black woman to serve on the Supreme Court." Even before it was known that Judge Jackson would be his nominee, even before Biden was elected, he pledged that he would nominate a black woman to serve on the Supreme Court. 

And now that President Biden has nominated Judge Jackson, Democrats have continued hammering the historic nature of his nomination. So too has basically every piece of mainstream media coverage emphasized her identity as a black woman in ledes and headlines. 

Yet this historic nominee herself cannot define "woman."

Senator Blackburn told Townhall Tuesday night following her exchange with Judge Jackson that "It is stunning that someone who is seeking to be on the Supreme Court can’t provide a one sentence definition on the word woman."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement